경피독성 시험 시장 : 세계 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측 - 시험 유형별, 시험 방법 유형별(생체내 시험과 생체외 시험), 최종사용자별, 지역별, 경쟁별(2020-2030F)
Dermal Toxicity Testing Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Test Type, By Testing Method Type (In Vivo Testing and In Vitro Testing ), By End User, By Region & Competition, 2020-2030F
세계의 경피독성 시험 시장 규모는 2024년에 21억 달러에 달하며, 2030년까지 CAGR은 8.15%로, 예측 기간 중 인상적인 성장을 달성할 것으로 예측됩니다.
세계의 경피독성 시험 시장은 규제 의무화, 동물실험에 대한 윤리적 우려, 기술 발전, 연구개발(R&D)에 대한 투자 증가 등으로 인해 꾸준히 성장하고 있습니다. 이 시장은 제약, 화장품, 화학, 생명공학 산업에 필수적인 시장으로, 시장 진입 전 제품의 안전성과 규제 적합성을 보장합니다.
| 시장 개요 |
| 예측 기간 |
2026-2030 |
| 시장 규모 : 2024년 |
21억 달러 |
| 시장 규모 : 2030년 |
33억 7,000만 달러 |
| CAGR : 2025-2030년 |
8.15% |
| 급성장 부문 |
체외 시험 |
| 최대 시장 |
북미 |
FDA(미국), EMA(유럽), OECD등의 규제기관은 경피 독성 평가에 대한 엄격한 안전 프로토콜을 제정하고 있으며, 기업은 첨단 시험 방법을 채택해야 합니다. 규제 변화, 최첨단 기술 혁신, 안전하고 윤리적이고 잔인하지 않은 제품에 대한 소비자 수요 증가로 인해 업계는 큰 변화를 겪고 있습니다.
높은 초기 비용과 규제 표준화와 같은 과제는 여전히 남아 있지만, 지속적인 연구개발 노력, 신흥 국가 시장 기회 확대, 전략적 업계 제휴가 새로운 성장의 길을 열어가고 있습니다. 비동물 실험법의 채택이 증가함에 따라 시장은 지속적으로 확대될 것이며, 의약품, 화장품, 화학제품 전반에 걸친 안전성 시험의 미래를 전 세계에서 형성하는 데 중요한 역할을 할 것입니다.
주요 시장 성장 촉진요인
동물 실험 금지의 증가와 대체법으로의 이동
주요 시장이 해결해야 할 과제
대체법 검증
주요 시장 동향
첨단 체외 모델
목차
제1장 개요
제2장 조사 방법
제3장 개요
제4장 고객의 소리
제5장 세계의 경피독성 시험 시장 전망
- 시장 규모·예측
- 시장 점유율·예측
- 시험의 유형별(피부 자극성 시험, 피부 감작성 시험)
- 시험 방법의 유형별(in vivo 시험(동물 기반 시험), in vitro 시험(세포 기반 또는 조직 기반 시험))
- 최종사용자별(제약 업계, 화장품·퍼스널케어 제품 업계, 화학 업계, 기타)
- 지역별
- 기업별(2024)
- 시장 맵
제6장 북미의 경피독성 시험 시장 전망
- 시장 규모·예측
- 시장 점유율·예측
- 북미 : 국가별 분석
제7장 유럽의 경피독성 시험 시장 전망
- 시장 규모·예측
- 시장 점유율·예측
- 유럽 : 국가별 분석
제8장 아시아태평양의 경피독성 시험 시장 전망
- 시장 규모·예측
- 시장 점유율·예측
- 아시아태평양 : 국가별 분석
제9장 남미의 경피독성 시험 시장 전망
- 시장 규모·예측
- 시장 점유율·예측
- 남미 : 국가별 분석
제10장 중동 및 아프리카의 경피독성 시험 시장 전망
- 시장 규모·예측
- 시장 점유율·예측
- 중동 및 아프리카 : 국가별 분석
제11장 시장 역학
제12장 시장 동향과 발전
제13장 세계의 경피독성 시험 시장 : SWOT 분석
제14장 Porter's Five Forces 분석
- 업계내 경쟁
- 신규 참여의 가능성
- 공급업체의 힘
- 고객의 힘
- 대체품의 위협
제15장 경쟁 구도
- SGS S.A.
- Covance, Inc
- Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
- Qiagen N.V.
- GE Healthcare
- Eurofins Scientific Inc
- Merck KgaA
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
- Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
- Catalent, Inc
제16장 전략적 제안
제17장 조사회사 소개·면책사항
KSA
Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market was valued at USD 2.10 Billion in 2024 and is anticipated to project impressive growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 8.15% through 2030. The Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market is witnessing steady growth, driven by regulatory mandates, ethical concerns over animal testing, technological advancements, and increased investments in research and development (R&D). This market is essential to the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, chemical, and biotechnology industries, ensuring product safety and regulatory compliance before market entry.
| Market Overview |
|---|
| Forecast Period | 2026-2030 |
| Market Size 2024 | USD 2.10 Billion |
| Market Size 2030 | USD 3.37 Billion |
| CAGR 2025-2030 | 8.15% |
| Fastest Growing Segment | In Vitro Testing |
| Largest Market | North America |
Regulatory bodies such as the FDA (U.S.), EMA (Europe), and OECD have established stringent safety protocols for dermal toxicity assessment, compelling companies to adopt advanced testing methodologies. The industry is undergoing a significant transformation, fueled by regulatory changes, cutting-edge innovations, and growing consumer demand for safe, ethical, and cruelty-free products.
While challenges such as high initial costs and regulatory standardization remain, ongoing R&D efforts, expanding market opportunities in emerging economies, and strategic industry collaborations are unlocking new avenues for growth. With the increasing adoption of non-animal testing methods, the market is poised for continued expansion, reinforcing its critical role in shaping the future of safety testing across pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and chemicals on a global scale.
Key Market Drivers
Growing Ban on Animal Testing and Shift Toward Alternative Methods
The increasing global restrictions on animal testing have become a significant catalyst for the growth of the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market. As ethical concerns, regulatory pressures, and technological advancements converge, industries are rapidly transitioning toward alternative testing methods that are more reliable, cost-effective, and aligned with modern scientific standards. Over the past two decades, several governments and regulatory bodies have implemented strict prohibitions on animal testing, particularly in the cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and chemical industries. The Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 introduced: A testing ban: Animal testing on finished cosmetic products has been banned since September 2004, and testing on ingredients has been banned since March 2009. These nations have followed suit with similar bans on animal-tested cosmetics. While the FDA does not outright ban animal testing, states like California, Illinois, and New Jersey have imposed restrictions, leading to increased adoption of alternative testing approaches. Historically a proponent of animal testing, China has relaxed its regulations, now allowing non-animal methods for certain imported and domestically manufactured cosmetics. As regulatory compliance becomes non-negotiable, companies worldwide are investing heavily in alternative toxicity testing solutions, thus fueling market growth.
Key Market Challenges
Validation of Alternative Methods
The validation of alternative methods can pose challenges and potentially hinder the growth of the global dermal toxicity testing market. While alternative methods are sought after due to their ethical considerations and scientific advancements, their validation process can be complex and time-consuming. The validation of alternative methods requires extensive research, data collection, and comparison to established reference methods, often including animal testing benchmarks. This process can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, slowing down the adoption of these methods. As a result, market growth might be hindered, especially in the short term. Regulatory bodies typically require validation data to demonstrate the reliability and predictability of alternative methods. The acceptance of these methods in regulatory frameworks may take time, as agencies need to be convinced of their equivalence to existing methods. This delay can slow down the market growth, as companies hesitate to fully adopt alternative methods until they receive regulatory approval. The validation process aims to establish consistent and reproducible results across different laboratories and testing conditions. Variability in results can arise due to differences in protocols, equipment, or expertise. This lack of consistency can lead to skepticism about the reliability of alternative methods, causing some companies to hesitate in adopting them until these issues are resolved.
Key Market Trends
Advanced In Vitro Models
Advanced in vitro models better replicate human skin physiology, allowing for more accurate predictions of dermal toxicity. These models can mimic skin barrier function, cellular interactions, and complex biological processes, providing more reliable insights into how substances interact with human skin. As accuracy improves, industries can confidently assess potential hazards and make informed decisions about product safety. The use of animals for testing raises ethical concerns, and industries are increasingly turning to non-animal methods. Advanced in vitro models offer an ethical alternative by eliminating the need for animal testing while still providing scientifically meaningful results. Brands that prioritize ethical testing practices can enhance their reputation and appeal to consumers who value cruelty-free products. Regulatory bodies are recognizing the value of advanced in vitro models for safety assessment. As these methods become more validated and established, regulatory acceptance is increasing. Industries can use these methods to fulfill regulatory requirements, which accelerates their adoption and drives market growth. In vitro models offer quicker results compared to animal testing, allowing industries to streamline their testing processes and reduce time-to-market. Additionally, the ability to test multiple substances simultaneously enhances efficiency. While initial setup costs might be involved, the long-term cost-effectiveness of in vitro models can drive their adoption and market growth. Advanced in vitro models can be customized to mimic specific skin types, conditions, and populations. This flexibility enables industries to tailor testing to their products' target audiences, improving the relevance and accuracy of toxicity assessments. This customization can attract industries seeking personalized and precise testing solutions.
Key Market Players
- SGS S.A.
- Covance, Inc
- Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
- Qiagen N.V.
- GE Healthcare
- Eurofins Scientific Inc
- Merck KgaA
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
- Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
- Catalent, Inc.
Report Scope:
In this report, the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:
Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By Test Type:
- Skin Irritation Tests
- Skin Sensitization Tests
Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By Testing Method Type:
- In Vivo Testing (Animal-Based Tests)
- In Vitro Testing (Cell-Based or Tissue-Based Tests)
Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By End User:
- Pharmaceuticals industries
- Cosmetics and personal care products industry
- Chemical Industry
- Other
Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By Region:
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- France
- United Kingdom
- Italy
- Germany
- Spain
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- South Korea
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Colombia
- Middle East & Africa
- South Africa
- Saudi Arabia
- UAE
Competitive Landscape
Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market.
Available Customizations:
Global Dermal Toxicity Testing market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
Company Information
- Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).
Table of Contents
1. Product Overview
- 1.1. Market Definition
- 1.2. Scope of the Market
- 1.2.1. Markets Covered
- 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
- 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Objective of the Study
- 2.2. Baseline Methodology
- 2.3. Key Industry Partners
- 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
- 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
- 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
- 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Overview of the Market
- 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
- 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
- 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
- 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 5.2.1. By Test Type (Skin Irritation Tests, Skin Sensitization Tests)
- 5.2.2. By Testing Method Type (In Vivo Testing (Animal-Based Tests), In Vitro Testing (Cell-Based or Tissue-Based Tests))
- 5.2.3. By End User (Pharmaceuticals industries, Cosmetics and personal care products industry, Chemical Industry, Other)
- 5.2.4. By Region
- 5.2.5. By Company (2024)
- 5.3. Market Map
6. North America Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 6.2.1. By Test Type
- 6.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 6.2.3. By End User
- 6.2.4. By Country
- 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
- 6.3.1. United States Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 6.3.1.2.1. By Test Type
- 6.3.1.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 6.3.1.2.3. By End User
- 6.3.2. Canada Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 6.3.2.2.1. By Test Type
- 6.3.2.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 6.3.2.2.3. By End User
- 6.3.3. Mexico Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 6.3.3.2.1. By Test Type
- 6.3.3.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 6.3.3.2.3. By End User
7. Europe Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 7.2.1. By Test Type
- 7.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 7.2.3. By End User
- 7.2.4. By Country
- 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
- 7.3.1. France Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 7.3.1.2.1. By Test Type
- 7.3.1.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 7.3.1.2.3. By End User
- 7.3.2. Germany Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 7.3.2.2.1. By Test Type
- 7.3.2.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 7.3.2.2.3. By End User
- 7.3.3. United Kingdom Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 7.3.3.2.1. By Test Type
- 7.3.3.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 7.3.3.2.3. By End User
- 7.3.4. Italy Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 7.3.4.2.1. By Test Type
- 7.3.4.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 7.3.4.2.3. By End User
- 7.3.5. Spain Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 7.3.5.2.1. By Test Type
- 7.3.5.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 7.3.5.2.3. By End User
8. Asia-Pacific Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 8.2.1. By Test Type
- 8.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 8.2.3. By End User
- 8.2.4. By Country
- 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
- 8.3.1. China Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 8.3.1.2.1. By Test Type
- 8.3.1.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 8.3.1.2.3. By End User
- 8.3.2. India Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 8.3.2.2.1. By Test Type
- 8.3.2.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 8.3.2.2.3. By End User
- 8.3.3. Japan Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 8.3.3.2.1. By Test Type
- 8.3.3.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 8.3.3.2.3. By End User
- 8.3.4. South Korea Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 8.3.4.2.1. By Test Type
- 8.3.4.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 8.3.4.2.3. By End User
- 8.3.5. Australia Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 8.3.5.2.1. By Test Type
- 8.3.5.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 8.3.5.2.3. By End User
9. South America Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 9.2.1. By Test Type
- 9.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 9.2.3. By End User
- 9.2.4. By Country
- 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
- 9.3.1. Brazil Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 9.3.1.2.1. By Test Type
- 9.3.1.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 9.3.1.2.3. By End User
- 9.3.2. Argentina Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 9.3.2.2.1. By Test Type
- 9.3.2.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 9.3.2.2.3. By End User
- 9.3.3. Colombia Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 9.3.3.2.1. By Test Type
- 9.3.3.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 9.3.3.2.3. By End User
10. Middle East and Africa Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 10.2.1. By Test Type
- 10.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 10.2.3. By End User
- 10.2.4. By Country
- 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
- 10.3.1. South Africa Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 10.3.1.2.1. By Test Type
- 10.3.1.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 10.3.1.2.3. By End User
- 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 10.3.2.2.1. By Test Type
- 10.3.2.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 10.3.2.2.3. By End User
- 10.3.3. UAE Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook
- 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
- 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
- 10.3.3.2.1. By Test Type
- 10.3.3.2.2. By Testing Method Type
- 10.3.3.2.3. By End User
11. Market Dynamics
- 11.1. Drivers
- 11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
- 12.1. Recent Development
- 12.2. Mergers & Acquisitions
- 12.3. Product Launches
13. Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- 14.1. Competition in the Industry
- 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
- 14.3. Power of Suppliers
- 14.4. Power of Customers
- 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. SGS S.A.
- 15.1.1. Business Overview
- 15.1.2. Product & Service Offerings
- 15.1.3. Recent Developments
- 15.1.4. Financials (If Listed)
- 15.1.5. Key Personnel
- 15.1.6. SWOT Analysis
- 15.2. Covance, Inc
- 15.3. Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
- 15.4. Qiagen N.V.
- 15.5. GE Healthcare
- 15.6. Eurofins Scientific Inc
- 15.7. Merck KgaA
- 15.8. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
- 15.9. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
- 15.10. Catalent, Inc
16. Strategic Recommendations
17. About Us & Disclaimer
