¼¼°èÀÇ ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå
Mycoplasma Testing
»óǰÄÚµå : 1655298
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 02¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 158 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 5,850 £Ü 8,260,000
PDF (Single User License) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 17,550 £Ü 24,780,000
PDF (Global License to Company and its Fully-owned Subsidiaries) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 19¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ Àü¸Á

2024³â¿¡ 11¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â¿¡´Â 19¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇϰí, ºÐ¼®±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â CAGRÀº 8.6%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ¾î¼¼ÀÌ, ŰƮ, ½Ã¾àÀº ÀÌ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ºÎ¹® ÇϳªÀ̸ç, ºÐ¼®±â°£ Á¾·á±îÁö CAGR 9.4%¸¦ ±â·ÏÇϸç 9¾ï 4,080¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ¼­ºñ½º ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀº ºÐ¼®±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGR 8.1%·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀåÀº 2¾ï 9,190¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 12.7%·Î ¼ºÀå ¿¹Ãø

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 2¾ï 9,190¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ °æÁ¦ ´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº ºÐ¼®±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â CAGR 12.7%·Î 2030³â±îÁö 4¾ï 8,320¸¸ ´Þ·¯ÀÇ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖ°í, ºÐ¼®±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGRÀº °¢°¢ 4.4%¿Í 7.7%·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼­´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ CAGR 5.4%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°è ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ ¹× ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®

¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç¶õ ¹«¾ùÀ̸ç, ¿Ö ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ°ú ¼¼Æ÷¹è¾ç¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀΰ¡?

¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç´Â ¼¼Æ÷¹è¾ç, ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ, ¹é½Å¿¡¼­ ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ ¿À¿°À» °ËÃâÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸»ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶´Â ¼¼Æ÷º®ÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¹ÚÅ׸®¾ÆÀÇ ÀÏÁ¾À¸·Î, ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ Á¦Á¶¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¼¼Æ÷¹è¾ç¿¡¼­ ¿À¿°À» ÀÏÀ¸Å³ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× Å©±â¿Í À¯¿¬¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÇÊÅ͸¦ Åë°úÇÏ¿© °¨ÁöµÇÁö ¾Ê°í »ý¸í°øÇÐ °øÁ¤À» ¿À¿°½ÃÄÑ Á¦Ç°ÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º°ú È¿´ÉÀ» ¼Õ»ó½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ ¿À¿°Àº ¼¼Æ÷ »ý¸®ÇÐÀÇ º¯È­, ºÎÁ¤È®ÇÑ ½ÇÇè °á°ú, Á¦Ç° ȸ¼ö·Î À̾îÁú ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ½ÇÇè½Ç, Á¦¾à ȸ»ç, ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ Á¦Á¶ ½Ã¼³¿¡¼­´Â ÀÏ»óÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç°¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ±âÁØÀ» ÁؼöÇϰí ÀÇ·á ¹× ¿¬±¸¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¼¼Æ÷ À¯·¡ Á¦Ç°ÀÇ ¹«°á¼ºÀ» À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô Çü¼ºÇϰí Àִ°¡?

±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀº ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»çÀÇ Á¤È®¼º, ¼Óµµ ¹× ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» Å©°Ô Çâ»ó½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀüÅëÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °ËÃâÀº ¹è¾ç¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ½Ã°£°ú ³ë·ÂÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ ¼Ò¿äµÇ°í °á°ú°¡ ³ª¿À±â±îÁö ¸î ÁÖ°¡ °É¸³´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò ¿¬¼â ¹ÝÀÀ(PCR) ¹× ½Ç½Ã°£ PCR(qPCR)°ú °°Àº ºÐÀÚÁø´ÜÇÐÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº º¸´Ù ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°í ¹Î°¨ÇÏ¸ç Æ¯ÀÌÀûÀÎ ¿À¿° °ËÃâÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ¿© ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç¿¡ Çõ¸íÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Ä×½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÇÙ»ê ÁõÆø ±â¼ú(NAATs)°ú Â÷¼¼´ë ¿°±â¼­¿­ ºÐ¼®(NGS) ±â¼úÀº °ËÃâ ´É·ÂÀ» ´õ¿í Çâ»ó½ÃÄÑ º¸´Ù ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ Á¾À» ½Äº°ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇØÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ °Ë»ç Ç÷§ÆûÀº ÀÏ»óÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ½Ã°£°ú ³ëµ¿·ÂÀ» ÁÙÀ̰í, ½ÇÇè½Ç°ú »ý»ê½Ã¼³ÀÌ ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ¿À¿° ¾ø´Â ȯ°æÀ» º¸ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï µ½½À´Ï´Ù.

±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°Ç°ú ¾÷°è Ç¥ÁØÀº ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ¼ö¿ä¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í Àִ°¡?

¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ Á¦Á¶¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°Ç°ú ¾ÈÀüÇϰí È¿°úÀûÀÎ »ý¸í°øÇÐ Á¦Ç°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ ½ÄǰÀǾ౹(FDA) ¹× À¯·´ÀǾàǰû(EMA)°ú °°Àº ±ÔÁ¦ ±â°üÀº Á¦Ç°ÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇÏ°í ¿À¿°À» ¹æÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼¼Æ÷ ±â¹Ý Á¦Ç°, »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Á¦Á¦ ¹× ¹é½Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÏ»óÀûÀÎ ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç¸¦ Àǹ«È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±ÔÁ¤À» ÁؼöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº Á¦¾àȸ»ç°¡ Á¦Ç° ½ÂÀÎÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ°í ºñ¿ëÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ µå´Â Áö¿¬°ú ¸®ÄÝÀ» ÇÇÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ »ê¾÷ÀÇ ¼ºÀå°ú CRO(ÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè¼öʱâ°ü) ¹× CMO(ÀǾàǰ Á¦Á¶¼öʱâ°ü)ÀÇ È®´ë´Â º¸´Ù ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°í ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¿À¿° À§ÇèÀÌ Á¦Ç°ÀÇ »ýÁ¸À²¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¼¼Æ÷ Ä¡·áÁ¦ ¹× À¯ÀüÀÚ Ä¡·áÁ¦ÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ½ÃÇè ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´õ¿í Ä¿Áö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?

¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº ºÐÀÚÁø´ÜÀÇ ¹ßÀü, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ÀÇ °¨½Ã °­È­, ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ »ý»ê È®´ë µî ¿©·¯ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, PCR ¹× NGS¿Í °°Àº º¸´Ù ½Å¼ÓÇϰí Á¤¹ÐÇÑ °Ë»ç¹ýÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀº ¿À¿° °ËÃâÀ» °­È­ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼úÀ» ¾÷°è¿¡¼­ Á¡Á¡ ´õ ³Î¸® º¸±ÞÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Á¦Á¦, ¹é½Å ¹× ¼¼Æ÷ ±â¹Ý Ä¡·á¹ýÀÇ È®»êÀº ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¦Ç°µéÀÌ Æ¯È÷ ¿À¿°ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ±â ½±±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °Ë»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡¿¡ ±â¿©Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Á¦Á¦ ¹× ¼¼Æ÷¹è¾ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤±âÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç¸¦ Àǹ«È­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°ÇÀº °í±Þ ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÇö󽺸¶ °ËÃâ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ´õ¿í ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¦¾à ¾÷°è¿¡¼­´Â ±ÔÁ¤ Áؼö¿Í Á¦Ç° ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇØ °ß°íÇÑ °Ë»ç ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ À§Å¹ ¿¬±¸ ¹× Á¦Á¶ ¼­ºñ½º ÀÌ¿ëÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °Íµµ ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, »ý¸í°øÇÐ °øÁ¤¿¡¼­ ǰÁú °ü¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö¸é¼­ º¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀ̰í ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ °Ë»ç Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °³¹ßÀÌ ÃËÁøµÇ¾î ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» ´õ¿í °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ºÎ¹®

Á¦°ø(ºÐ¼®, ŰƮ ¹× ½Ã¾à, ¼­ºñ½º, Àåºñ), ±â¹ý(ÇÙ»ê°Ë»ç(NAT), ELISA, ¿°»ö, ±âŸ ±â¹ý), ÀÀ¿ë(¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ °Ë»ç, »ý»ê Á¾·á ¼¼Æ÷ °Ë»ç, ¹ÙÀÌ·¯½º °Ë»ç, ±âŸ ÀÀ¿ë)

Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±â¾÷ ¿¹½Ã(11°³»ç)

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå °æÀï

ksm
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Global Mycoplasma Testing Market to Reach US$1.9 Billion by 2030

The global market for Mycoplasma Testing estimated at US$1.1 Billion in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$1.9 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 8.6% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Mycoplasma Testing Assays, Kits & Reagents, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 9.4% CAGR and reach US$940.8 Million by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Mycoplasma Testing Services segment is estimated at 8.1% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$291.9 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 12.7% CAGR

The Mycoplasma Testing market in the U.S. is estimated at US$291.9 Million in the year 2024. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$483.2 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 12.7% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 4.4% and 7.7% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 5.4% CAGR.

Global Mycoplasma Testing Market – Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

What Is Mycoplasma Testing and Why Is It Essential in Biopharmaceuticals and Cell Cultures?

Mycoplasma testing refers to the detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures, biopharmaceutical products, and vaccines. Mycoplasmas are a group of bacteria that lack a cell wall and can cause contamination in cell cultures used in biopharmaceutical production. Due to their small size and flexibility, they can pass through conventional filters and contaminate biotechnological processes without detection, compromising product safety and efficacy. Mycoplasma contamination can lead to alterations in cell physiology, inaccurate experimental results, and product recalls, making routine testing essential in laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, and biopharmaceutical production facilities. Testing for mycoplasma is critical for ensuring compliance with regulatory standards and maintaining the integrity of cell-based products used in medical treatments and research.

How Are Technological Advances Shaping Mycoplasma Testing Methods?

Technological innovations are significantly improving the accuracy, speed, and reliability of mycoplasma testing. Traditionally, mycoplasma detection was performed using culture-based methods, which are time-consuming and labor-intensive, taking weeks to yield results. However, advancements in molecular diagnostics, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR), have revolutionized mycoplasma testing by enabling faster, more sensitive, and specific detection of contamination. Additionally, nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are further enhancing detection capabilities, allowing for the identification of a broader range of mycoplasma species. Automated testing platforms are also reducing the time and labor required for routine testing, making it easier for laboratories and production facilities to ensure contamination-free environments in real-time.

How Are Regulatory Requirements and Industry Standards Impacting the Demand for Mycoplasma Testing?

Stringent regulatory requirements in biopharmaceutical production and the increasing demand for safe and effective biotechnological products are driving the demand for mycoplasma testing. Regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate routine mycoplasma testing for cell-based products, biologics, and vaccines to ensure product safety and prevent contamination. Compliance with these regulations is critical for pharmaceutical companies to maintain product approval and avoid costly delays or recalls. The growing biopharmaceutical industry, along with the expansion of contract research organizations (CROs) and contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs), is also pushing the adoption of faster and more reliable mycoplasma testing methods. Moreover, with the rise in cell and gene therapies, where contamination risks can significantly affect product viability, the need for stringent testing protocols has become even more essential.

What Are the Key Growth Drivers in the Mycoplasma Testing Market?

The growth in the mycoplasma testing market is driven by several factors, including advancements in molecular diagnostics, increased regulatory scrutiny, and the expansion of biopharmaceutical production. The shift toward faster and more precise testing methods, such as PCR and NGS, is enhancing contamination detection, making these technologies increasingly popular in the industry. The rising prevalence of biologics, vaccines, and cell-based therapies is also contributing to the growing demand for reliable mycoplasma testing, as these products are particularly susceptible to contamination. Additionally, regulatory requirements mandating regular testing of biologics and cell cultures are further pushing the adoption of advanced mycoplasma detection solutions. The growing use of contract research and manufacturing services in the pharmaceutical industry is another driver, as these organizations require robust testing protocols to ensure compliance and product safety. Lastly, the increasing focus on quality control in biotechnological processes is promoting the continuous development of more efficient and automated testing platforms, further accelerating market growth.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Mycoplasma Testing market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:

Offering (Assays, Kits & Reagents, Services, Instruments); Technique (Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT), ELISA, Staining, Other Techniques); Application (Cell Line Testing, End-of-Production Cell Testing, Virus Testing, Other Applications)

Geographic Regions/Countries:

World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; Spain; Russia; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific (Australia; India; South Korea; and Rest of Asia-Pacific); Latin America (Argentina; Brazil; Mexico; and Rest of Latin America); Middle East (Iran; Israel; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; and Rest of Middle East); and Africa.

Select Competitors (Total 11 Featured) -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

IV. COMPETITION

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â