해양 생물촉진제 시장 : 세계 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측 - 성분별, 적용 형태별, 최종 용도별, 지역별, 경쟁별(2020-2030년)
Marine Biostimulants Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Ingredient, By Mode of Application, End Use, By Region and Competition, 2020-2030F
상품코드:1841626
리서치사:TechSci Research
발행일:2025년 09월
페이지 정보:영문 185 Pages
라이선스 & 가격 (부가세 별도)
ㅁ Add-on 가능: 고객의 요청에 따라 일정한 범위 내에서 Customization이 가능합니다. 자세한 사항은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
한글목차
세계의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 규모는 2024년에 12억 8,012만 달러로 평가되었으며, 예측 기간 동안 CAGR은 5.33%로 2030년까지 17억 4,809만 달러에 달할 것으로 예측됩니다. 세계의 해양 생물촉진제 시장은 지속 가능한 작물 투입, 영양 이용 효율 개선, 스트레스 내성 강화에 대한 수요 증가에 힘입어 강력한 성장을 이루고 있습니다. 해조류 추출물이 주도하는 이 시장은 확대되는 수산 양식, 규제 지원, 정밀 농업 통합으로부터 이익을 얻으며, 해양 생물촉진제를 세계 지속 가능한 농업 강화를 위한 주요 실현자로 자리매김하고 있습니다.
시장 개요
예측 기간
2026-2030년
시장 규모 : 2024년
12억 8,012만 달러
시장 규모 : 2030년
17억 4,809만 달러
CAGR : 2025-2030년
5.33%
급성장 부문
어류 단백질 가수분해물
최대 시장
북미
주요 시장 촉진요인
지속가능한 저투입 농업으로의 전환
주요 시장 과제
과학적 증거의 격차와 시험 설계의 과제
주요 시장 동향
정밀농업 및 디지털 의사결정 지원과의 통합
목차
제1장 제품 개요
제2장 조사 방법
제3장 주요 요약
제4장 세계의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 전망
시장 규모 및 예측
금액별
시장 점유율과 예측
성분별(해초 추출물, 어류 단백질 가수분해물, 키토산·해양성 다당류, 기타)
적용 형태별(엽면 처리, 토양 처리, 종자 처리)
최종 용도별(작물·곡물, 과일·채소, 잔디·관상용 식물, 기타)
지역별
기업별(2024년)
시장 맵
제5장 북미의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 전망
시장 규모 및 예측
금액별
시장 점유율과 예측
성분별
적용 모드별
최종 용도별
국가별
북미 : 국가별 분석
미국
멕시코
캐나다
제6장 유럽의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 전망
시장 규모 및 예측
시장 점유율과 예측
유럽 : 국가별 분석
프랑스
독일
영국
이탈리아
스페인
제7장 아시아태평양의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 전망
시장 규모 및 예측
시장 점유율과 예측
아시아태평양 : 국가별 분석
중국
인도
한국
일본
호주
제8장 남미의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 전망
시장 규모 및 예측
시장 점유율과 예측
남미 : 국가별 분석
브라질
아르헨티나
콜롬비아
제9장 중동 및 아프리카의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 전망
시장 규모 및 예측
시장 점유율과 예측
중동 및 아프리카 : 국가별 분석
남아프리카공화국
사우디아라비아
아랍에미리트
제10장 시장 역학
성장 촉진요인
과제
제11장 시장 동향과 발전
인수합병
제품 출시
최근 동향
제12장 세계의 해양 생물촉진제 시장 : SWOT 분석
제13장 Porter's Five Forces 분석
업계내 경쟁
신규 참여의 가능성
공급업체의 능력
고객의 능력
대체품의 위협
제14장 경쟁 구도
Acadian Seaplants Limited
UPL LTD
BioAtlantis Ltd.
Qingdao Blue Treasure Seaweed Biotech. Co., Ltd.
Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co., Ltd.
ClimaCrew Pvt Ltd
Ocean Rainforest Group
Thorvin, Inc.
Futureco Bioscience
Brandt, Inc.
제15장 전략적 제안
제16장 조사 회사 소개 및 면책사항
KSM
영문 목차
영문목차
Global Marine Biostimulants Market was valued at USD 1280.12 Million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 1748.09 Million by 2030 with a CAGR of 5.33% during the forecast period. The global marine biostimulants market is witnessing robust growth, driven by rising demand for sustainable crop inputs, improved nutrient-use efficiency, and enhanced stress resilience. Dominated by seaweed extracts, the market benefits from expanding aquaculture, regulatory support, and precision agriculture integration, positioning marine biostimulants as key enablers of sustainable agricultural intensification worldwide.
Market Overview
Forecast Period
2026-2030
Market Size 2024
USD 1280.12 Million
Market Size 2030
USD 1748.09 Million
CAGR 2025-2030
5.33%
Fastest Growing Segment
Fish Protein Hydrolysates
Largest Market
North America
Key Market Drivers
Shift Toward Sustainable, Low-Input Agriculture
In the modern agricultural landscape, stakeholders, including farmers, agribusinesses, and policymakers, are increasingly pressured to reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers and enhance nutrient-use efficiency (NUE). This comes amid mounting concerns over environmental degradation, rising input costs, and climate change. Marine biostimulants, derived from seaweed, algae, chitosan, and fish by-products, are at the nexus of sustainable intensification, enabling farms to do more with less.
Marine biostimulants stimulate natural plant processes to better uptake and assimilate nutrients, often enabling meaningful reductions in synthetic fertilizer use without sacrificing yield. Meta-analyses show average yield gains of around 18% when biostimulants are used under field conditions, demonstrating their potential to boost productivity while easing fertilizer pressure. Another study highlights that foliar applications of amino acid-based biostimulants (Terramin Pro) increased NUE by 28% in wheat, while protein hydrolysates improved NUE by 12.9% in spinach, and seaweed extract enhanced NUE by 16% in rapeseed and wheat.
Agronomic trials provide compelling evidence that biostimulants can significantly lower fertilizer requirements. In one trial conducted in Thailand, farmers achieved a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer application, with yields maintained, through combined application of biostimulants and reduced fertilizer rates. This demonstrates that growers can substantially cut input costs and environmental impacts while preserving productivity.
Excessive fertilizer use carries heavy environmental and economic costs. Globally, about 40-70% of applied nitrogen and up to 80-90% of phosphorus from conventional fertilizers may be lost to the environment through runoff, volatilization, or fixation, representing enormous inefficiencies and ecological burdens. The ability of marine biostimulants to moderate fertilizer use and enhance nutrient recovery can help tilt that balance in favor of sustainability.
Complementing these benefits, biostimulants also improve crop resilience and quality under stress conditions. For instance, foliar seaweed extracts (from Kappaphycus alvarezii and Gracilaria edulis) led to yield increases of 18.5% and 26.0% in maize, respectively, even in water-limited environments. These gains further validate that reduced-input systems, when aided by biostimulants, can still thrive under sub-optimal growing conditions.
Beyond agronomic performance, reducing fertilizer use offers clear economic rewards. In the U.S., nutrient inputs account for about 11.3% of total production costs in row crops. Notably, just a 20% improvement in NUE could raise net profit by approximately 1.3%, underscoring the attractive return potential of biostimulant adoption. These figures frame biostimulants as both ecological and financial levers for optimizing input use.
Key Market Challenges
Scientific Evidence Gaps and Trial Design Challenges
One of the central obstacles in the marine biostimulants market is the gap between controlled research outcomes and field-scale adoption. While a substantial number of laboratory and greenhouse studies highlight positive effects of seaweed extracts, chitosan, and other marine-derived compounds on nutrient-use efficiency, stress tolerance, and crop quality, translating these benefits into commercial agriculture remains challenging.
A key issue lies in the limited availability of multi-site, multi-season field trials. Controlled conditions often minimize variables, producing clearer results, but real-world farming is influenced by soil heterogeneity, climate fluctuations, management practices, and pest pressures. The lack of replicated, independent field trials across geographies and crop types reduces the robustness of evidence available to agronomists and growers. This makes it difficult to establish universal best-practice recommendations for dosage, application timing, and crop-specific benefits.
Moreover, heterogeneity in trial design-such as different endpoints (yield, quality, physiological parameters), diverse statistical methodologies, and inconsistent product formulations-further complicates comparison and meta-analysis. Without standardized protocols, drawing broad conclusions or benchmarking performance across competing products is problematic.
The consequence is a credibility gap. Farmers and large commercial agronomy programs, particularly in row crops where input risks are high, remain cautious in adopting marine biostimulants without demonstrable, repeatable returns on investment. To bridge this divide, the industry requires coordinated field-testing frameworks, transparent data sharing, and standardized efficacy metrics. Only with such scientific rigor can biostimulants progress from promising niche inputs to reliable components of mainstream agricultural programs.
Key Market Trends
Integration with Precision Agriculture and Digital Decision Support
One of the most transformative trends for the marine biostimulants market is their integration with precision agriculture technologies. While biostimulants have shown potential in enhancing plant resilience, nutrient uptake, and yield stability, their effectiveness often depends on precise timing, dosage, and placement. Traditional blanket applications across entire fields can dilute results and limit measurable benefits. By leveraging digital tools and precision platforms, agronomists can now optimize the use of biostimulants to maximize return on investment (ROI).
Technologies such as IoT-enabled soil and crop sensors, satellite imagery, and drones provide real-time data on plant health, moisture stress, and nutrient deficiencies. When integrated with biostimulant application programs, this allows for site-specific treatments, targeting only those areas where crops are most likely to respond. For instance, variable-rate applicators and drone-based foliar spraying can deliver products more efficiently, reducing waste and lowering overall input costs.
In addition, decision support systems (DSS) powered by AI and big data analytics are beginning to incorporate biostimulants into their agronomic recommendations. These platforms analyze historical yield maps, weather forecasts, and crop models to guide farmers on when and how to apply marine biostimulants for maximum efficacy.
This "biostimulants + tech" model not only improves performance consistency but also generates quantifiable evidence of ROI, a critical factor for expanding adoption in row crops. As more pilot projects and extension services demonstrate these integrated approaches, digital compatibility will likely become a key differentiator for leading biostimulant suppliers.
Key Market Players
Acadian Seaplants Limited
UPL LTD
BioAtlantis Ltd.
Qingdao Blue Treasure Seaweed Biotech. Co., Ltd.
Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co., Ltd.
ClimaCrew Pvt Ltd
Ocean Rainforest Group
Thorvin, Inc.
Futureco Bioscience
Brandt, Inc.
Report Scope
In this report, the Global Marine Biostimulants Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:
Marine Biostimulants Market, By Ingredient:
Seaweed Extracts
Fish Protein Hydrolysates
Chitosan and Marine Polysaccharides
Others
Marine Biostimulants Market, By Mode of Application:
Foliar Treatment
Soil Treatment
Seed Treatment
Marine Biostimulants Market, By End Use:
Row Crops & Cereals
Fruits & vegetables
Turf and Ornamentals
Others
Marine Biostimulants Market, By Region:
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Germany
Spain
Asia Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
South America
Brazil
Argentina
Colombia
Middle East & Africa
South Africa
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Competitive Landscape
Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Marine Biostimulants Market.
Available Customizations:
Global Marine Biostimulants Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
Company Information
Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).
Table of Contents
1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends
4. Global Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
4.1. Market Size & Forecast
4.1.1. By Value
4.2. Market Share & Forecast
4.2.1. By Ingredient (Seaweed Extracts, Fish Protein Hydrolysates, Chitosan and Marine Polysaccharides, Others)
4.2.2. By Mode of Application (Foliar Treatment, Soil Treatment, Seed Treatment)
4.2.3. By End Use (Row Crops & Cereals, Fruits & vegetables, Turf and Ornamentals, Others)
4.2.4. By Region
4.2.5. By Company (2024)
4.3. Market Map
5. North America Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Ingredient
5.2.2. By Mode of Application
5.2.3. By End Use
5.2.4. By Country
5.3. North America: Country Analysis
5.3.1. United States Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
5.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.3.1.1.1. By Value
5.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
5.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
5.3.1.2.3. By End Use
5.3.2. Mexico Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
5.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.3.2.1.1. By Value
5.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
5.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
5.3.2.2.3. By End Use
5.3.3. Canada Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
5.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.3.3.1.1. By Value
5.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
5.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
5.3.3.2.3. By End Use
6. Europe Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Ingredient
6.2.2. By Mode of Application
6.2.3. By End Use
6.2.4. By Country
6.3. Europe: Country Analysis
6.3.1. France Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.1.1.1. By Value
6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
6.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
6.3.1.2.3. By End Use
6.3.2. Germany Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.2.1.1. By Value
6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
6.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
6.3.2.2.3. By End Use
6.3.3. United Kingdom Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.3.1.1. By Value
6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
6.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
6.3.3.2.3. By End Use
6.3.4. Italy Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.4.1.1. By Value
6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.4.2.1. By Ingredient
6.3.4.2.2. By Mode of Application
6.3.4.2.3. By End Use
6.3.5. Spain Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.5.1.1. By Value
6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.5.2.1. By Ingredient
6.3.5.2.2. By Mode of Application
6.3.5.2.3. By End Use
7. Asia-Pacific Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Ingredient
7.2.2. By Mode of Application
7.2.3. By End Use
7.2.4. By Country
7.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
7.3.1. China Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.1.1.1. By Value
7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
7.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
7.3.1.2.3. By End Use
7.3.2. India Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.2.1.1. By Value
7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
7.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
7.3.2.2.3. By End Use
7.3.3. South Korea Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.3.1.1. By Value
7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
7.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
7.3.3.2.3. By End Use
7.3.4. Japan Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.4.1.1. By Value
7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.4.2.1. By Ingredient
7.3.4.2.2. By Mode of Application
7.3.4.2.3. By End Use
7.3.5. Australia Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.5.1.1. By Value
7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.5.2.1. By Ingredient
7.3.5.2.2. By Mode of Application
7.3.5.2.3. By End Use
8. South America Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Ingredient
8.2.2. By Mode of Application
8.2.3. By End Use
8.2.4. By Country
8.3. South America: Country Analysis
8.3.1. Brazil Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.1.1.1. By Value
8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
8.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
8.3.1.2.3. By End Use
8.3.2. Argentina Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.2.1.1. By Value
8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
8.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
8.3.2.2.3. By End Use
8.3.3. Colombia Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.3.1.1. By Value
8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
8.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
8.3.3.2.3. By End Use
9. Middle East and Africa Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Ingredient
9.2.2. By Mode of Application
9.2.3. By End Use
9.2.4. By Country
9.3. MEA: Country Analysis
9.3.1. South Africa Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.1.1.1. By Value
9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.1.2.1. By Ingredient
9.3.1.2.2. By Mode of Application
9.3.1.2.3. By End Use
9.3.2. Saudi Arabia Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.2.1.1. By Value
9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.2.2.1. By Ingredient
9.3.2.2.2. By Mode of Application
9.3.2.2.3. By End Use
9.3.3. UAE Marine Biostimulants Market Outlook
9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.3.1.1. By Value
9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.3.2.1. By Ingredient
9.3.3.2.2. By Mode of Application
9.3.3.2.3. By End Use
10. Market Dynamics
10.1. Drivers
10.2. Challenges
11. Market Trends & Developments
11.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
11.2. Product Launches (If Any)
11.3. Recent Developments
12. Global Marine Biostimulants Market: SWOT Analysis
13. Porters Five Forces Analysis
13.1. Competition in the Industry
13.2. Potential of New Entrants
13.3. Power of Suppliers
13.4. Power of Customers
13.5. Threat of Substitute Products
14. Competitive Landscape
14.1. Acadian Seaplants Limited
14.1.1. Business Overview
14.1.2. Company Snapshot
14.1.3. Products & Service Offerings
14.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
14.1.5. Recent Developments
14.1.6. Key Personnel Details
14.1.7. SWOT Analysis
14.2. UPL LTD
14.3. BioAtlantis Ltd.
14.4. Qingdao Blue Treasure Seaweed Biotech. Co., Ltd.
