¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°, ¿øÀÚ·Î À¯Çüº°, ¿ë·®º°, ±â¼úº°, ¿ëµµº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)
Nuclear Decommissioning Market by Type, Reactor Type, Capacity, Technology, Application, End-Users - Global Forecast 2025-2030
»óǰÄÚµå : 1714742
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : 360iResearch Private Limited
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 04¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 181 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 3,939 £Ü 5,496,000
PDF, Excel & 1 Year Online Access (Single User License) help
PDF ¹× Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ® µîÀÇ º¹»ç ¹× ºÙ¿©³Ö±â, ÀμⰡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿Â¶óÀÎ Ç÷§Æû¿¡¼­ 1³â µ¿¾È º¸°í¼­¸¦ ¹«Á¦ÇÑÀ¸·Î ´Ù¿î·ÎµåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Á¤±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®µÇ´Â Á¤º¸µµ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. (¿¬ 3-4ȸ Á¤µµ ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®)
US $ 4,249 £Ü 5,929,000
PDF, Excel & 1 Year Online Access (2-5 User License) help
PDF ¹× Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿Àϱâ¾÷ ³» 5¸í±îÁö ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ® µîÀÇ º¹»ç ¹× ºÙ¿©³Ö±â, ÀμⰡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿Â¶óÀÎ Ç÷§Æû¿¡¼­ 1³â µ¿¾È º¸°í¼­¸¦ ¹«Á¦ÇÑÀ¸·Î ´Ù¿î·ÎµåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Á¤±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®µÇ´Â Á¤º¸µµ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. (¿¬ 3-4ȸ Á¤µµ ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®)
US $ 5,759 £Ü 8,036,000
PDF, Excel & 1 Year Online Access (Site License) help
PDF ¹× Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ ³» µ¿ÀÏ Áö¿ª »ç¾÷ÀåÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ® µîÀÇ º¹»ç ¹× ºÙ¿©³Ö±â, ÀμⰡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿Â¶óÀÎ Ç÷§Æû¿¡¼­ 1³â µ¿¾È º¸°í¼­¸¦ ¹«Á¦ÇÑÀ¸·Î ´Ù¿î·ÎµåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Á¤±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®µÇ´Â Á¤º¸µµ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. (¿¬ 3-4ȸ Á¤µµ ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®)
US $ 6,969 £Ü 9,724,000
PDF, Excel & 1 Year Online Access (Enterprise User License) help
PDF ¹× Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ® µîÀÇ º¹»ç ¹× ºÙ¿©³Ö±â, ÀμⰡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿Â¶óÀÎ Ç÷§Æû¿¡¼­ 1³â µ¿¾È º¸°í¼­¸¦ ¹«Á¦ÇÑÀ¸·Î ´Ù¿î·ÎµåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Á¤±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®µÇ´Â Á¤º¸µµ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. (¿¬ 3-4ȸ Á¤µµ ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®)


¤± Add-on °¡´É: °í°´ÀÇ ¿äû¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ ¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡¼­ CustomizationÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ »çÇ×Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
¤± º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼Û±âÀÏÀº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 71¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â CAGR 6.27%·Î 75¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¼ºÀåÇϰí, 2030³â¿¡´Â 103¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 71¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 75¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 103¾ï ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 6.27%

ÇöÀç ¼¼°è ¿¡³ÊÁö ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ¿¡¼­ ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼´Â Á¤ºÎ, »ê¾÷ü, ȯ°æ Àü¹®°¡ ¸ðµÎ¿¡°Ô Áß¿äÇÑ °ü½É ºÐ¾ß·Î ¹ßÀüÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿øÀÚ·Â ½Ã¼³À» ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°Ô ÇØÃ¼, ¿À¿° Á¦°Å ¹× Æó±âÇÏ´Â °úÁ¤Àº ±â¼úÀû °úÁ¦ÀÏ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ȯ°æ ¾ÈÀü°ú »çȸÀû ½Å·Ú¸¦ µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû ¿ä±¸À̱⵵ ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ¿øÀÚ·Â ½Ã¼³ Æó·ÎÀÇ ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ Ãø¸éÀ» ޱ¸Çϰí, ü°èÈ­µÈ ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©, ±â¼úÀû Çõ½Å, Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ °üÇà¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾à¼ÓÀÇ Á߿伺À» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼ö½Ê ³âÀÇ ¿øÀڷ¹ßÀü ¿ª»ç¿¡¼­ ³ëÈÄÈ­µÈ ÀÚ»êÀÇ ¾ÈÀüÇÑ Æó·Î¿Í »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀº ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù ºü¸¥ ¼Óµµ·Î ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »óȲ¿¡¼­ ¿øÀÚ·Â »ê¾÷Àº ȯ°æ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÙÀ̰í, ¹æ»ç¼º Æó±â¹°À» °ü¸®Çϰí, Àå±âÀûÀÎ ºÎÁö º¸¾ÈÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ý°ú ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ¾ÈÀü ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÇ À¶ÇÕÀ» ¸ñ°ÝÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤±ÇÀÚµéÀº ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ ±â´ëÄ¡, ȯ°æÀû ûÁö±â Á¤½ÅÀÇ Àý¹ÚÇÑ ¿ä±¸ »çÀÌÀÇ »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ë¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ Å« µµ¹ÚÀ» Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå º¯È­¿Í Àü·«Àû ¼¼ºÐÈ­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇϰí, ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ȯ°æÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Áö¿ª ¹× ±â¾÷ °íÀ¯ÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÐÀ» ¹àÇô³¿À¸·Î½á ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ Æ÷°ýÀûÀ¸·Î ޱ¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Åä´ë¸¦ ¸¶·ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¯È­

ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È ¾ÈÀü ±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ ÁøÈ­, ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü, ȯ°æ À§Çè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù ¼¶¼¼ÇÑ ÀÌÇØ¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ Á¤¼¼¿¡ Å« º¯È­°¡ ÀϾ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­¿¡´Â ¸î °¡Áö ¿äÀÎÀÌ ±â¿©Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ù°, ±ÔÁ¦ °³Çõ°ú ±¹Á¦ ¾ÈÀü ±âÁØÀÇ °­È­·Î ÀÎÇØ Æó·Î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù °ß°íÇϰí ü°èÀûÀÎ Á¢±ÙÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¿î¿µÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º°ú È¿À²¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃŰ´Â ÷´Ü ¿£Áö´Ï¾î¸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç°ú °­È­µÈ Æó·Î ÀýÂ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µÑ°, ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀÌ ±âÁ¸ °üÇàÀ» À籸¼ºÇß½À´Ï´Ù. »õ·Î¿î ÇØÃ¼ ±â¼ú°ú ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ ·Îº¿ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ÇöÀç ¼öÀÛ¾÷À» º¸¿ÏÇϰí Á¤È®¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϸç À§Çè ¹°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àΰ£ÀÇ ³ëÃâÀ» °¨¼Ò½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®°ú ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º ÀÚµ¿È­ÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀ» ÅëÇØ »ç¾÷ÀÚ´Â ¹®Á¦¸¦ º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¿¹ÃøÇÏ°í Æó·Î Àü·«À» µ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶Á¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º°ú ȯ°æ º¸È£¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃá Á¤Ã¥ÀÇ ÃßÁø·ÂÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ »ç¾÷ÀÚ´Â Æó±â¹° ó¸®¿Í Àç·á ÀçȰ¿ëÀÌ Æó·Î Àü·«ÀÇ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼ÒÀÓÀ» º¸ÀåÇÏ°í º¸´Ù ¼øÈ¯ °æÁ¦ÀÇ ¿øÄ¢À» äÅÃÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼úÀû, ±ÔÁ¦Àû ¿ä±¸ÀÇ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ °á°ú·Î¼­, °¡´ÉÇÑ °æ¿ì ¾ÈÀüÇÑ Àå±â º¸°üº¸´Ù´Â Áï°¢ÀûÀÎ ÇØÃ¼·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀΠȯ°æÀº ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ÀÌÇà¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÀü°ú È¿À²¼ºÀÇ Àǹ̸¦ ²÷ÀÓ¾øÀÌ ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϰí ÀÖ´Â »óȲ¿¡¼­ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤±ÇÀÚµéÀÌ ºñ¿ë, ¾ÈÀü, ȯ°æ ¿µÇâÀÇ ¿ä±¸»çÇ×À» ±ÕÇü ÀÖ°Ô °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå ÁÖ¿ä ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÀλçÀÌÆ®

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ »ìÆìº¸¸é, ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿ä±¸¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇϰí ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ´ÙÃþÀû Á¢±Ù¹æ½ÄÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ÃÀåÀº Å©°Ô À¯Çüº°·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¸ç, ¸Å¸³, Áï½Ã ÇØÃ¼, ¾ÈÀüÀúÀå µîÀÇ Á¢±Ù¹æ½ÄÀÌ °¢°¢ °ËÅäµË´Ï´Ù. ¸Å¸³ óºÐ Áß¿¡¼­µµ ¿øÀ§Ä¡ óºÐ°ú ÇöÀå °ü¸®¿Í °°Àº ´µ¾Ó½º´Â ÇÙÆó±â¹° °ü¸®ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °æ·Î¸¦ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¿øÀÚ·Î À¯Çüº°·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ºñµî¼öÇü ¿øÀÚ·Î, °í¼ÓÁõ½Ä·Î, °¡½º³Ã°¢·Î, °¡¾Ð°æ¼ö·Î, °¡¾Ð°æ¼ö·Î, ÃֽмÒÇü ¸ðµâÇü ¿øÀÚ·Î µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿øÀÚ·Â ½Ã¼³ÀÇ Æó·ÎÀÇ º¹À⼺À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °¢ ¿øÀÚ·Î À¯Çü¸¶´Ù °íÀ¯ÇÑ °úÁ¦°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ ¸Â´Â ±â¼ú Àü·«ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, ½Ã¼³À» 300-800MWe, 800MWe ÀÌ»ó, 300MWe ÀÌÇÏ·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ´Â ¿ë·® ºÐ·ù¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ±Ô¸ð¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ±â¼úÀû, ±ÔÁ¦Àû ÁÖÀÇ ¼öÁØÀÌ °áÁ¤µÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. ¿À¿° Á¦°Å ±â¼ú, ÇØÃ¼ ±â¼ú, Æó±â¹° ó¸® ¹× ó¸® ´É·Â¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃá ±â¼ú ±â¹Ý ºÐ·ù¿¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °¢ ±â¼ú °æ·Î´Â Àüü ÇØÃ¼ ÀÛ¾÷ÀÇ ÀÛ¾÷ È¿À²¼º°ú ºñ¿ë °ü¸®¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌĨ´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î, »ê¾÷ ¹× ÀÇ·á¿ë µ¿À§¿ø¼Ò »ý»ê ½Ã¼³°ú ¿øÀڷ¹ßÀü¼Ò ¹× ¿¬±¸¿ë ¿øÀڷθ¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ±â¹Ý ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â ÇØÃ¼ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿î¿µ »óȲ¿¡ ÀûÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÔÀ» º¸¿©ÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­´Â Á¤ºÎ ±â°ü ¹× ±¹¿µ±â¾÷°ú ¹Î°£ ±â¾÷ ¹× °øÀÍ ±â¾÷ °£ÀÇ ÅõÀÚ, ½ÇÇà ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ ¹× Àå±âÀûÀÎ °ü¸® ±â´ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ °üÁ¡À» ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ °üÁ¡Àº ȹÀÏÀûÀÎ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î´Â ÃæºÐÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» °­Á¶Çϸç, ¾÷°è ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¢ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ½ÃÀåÀÇ °íÀ¯ÇÑ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÏ´Â °íµµÀÇ ¸ÂÃãÇü Àü·«À» äÅÃÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡À» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

Á¦6Àå ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°

Á¦7Àå ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : ¿øÀÚ·Î À¯Çüº°

Á¦8Àå ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : ¿ë·®º°

Á¦9Àå ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : ±â¼úº°

Á¦10Àå ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

Á¦11Àå ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¿øÀÚ·Â ÇØÃ¼ ½ÃÀå

Á¦15Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

±â¾÷ ¸®½ºÆ®

ksm
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

The Nuclear Decommissioning Market was valued at USD 7.15 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.57 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.27%, reaching USD 10.30 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 7.15 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 7.57 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 10.30 billion
CAGR (%) 6.27%

In the current global energy paradigm, nuclear decommissioning has evolved into a critical area of focus for governments, industry operators, and environmental specialists alike. The process of safely dismantling, decontaminating, and disposing of nuclear facilities is not only a technical challenge but also a strategic imperative that underpins environmental safety and public confidence. This report delves into the multifaceted aspects of nuclear decommissioning, highlighting the importance of well-structured regulatory frameworks, technical breakthroughs, and a commitment to sustainable practices. With decades of nuclear power generation behind us, the safe retirement of aging assets and the transition to newer technologies is accelerating at an unprecedented pace. In this context, the industry is witnessing a convergence of innovative methodologies and stringent safety protocols aimed at reducing environmental impact, managing radioactive waste, and ensuring long-term site security. The stakes are high as decision-makers navigate the interplay between technological innovations, regulatory expectations, and the pressing demand for environmental stewardship. This introduction lays the groundwork for a comprehensive exploration of these themes by providing key insights into transformative market shifts and strategic segmentation, as well as uncovering crucial regional and company-specific dynamics that shape the global market landscape.

Transformative Shifts in Nuclear Decommissioning Landscape

Recent years have seen remarkable shifts in the nuclear decommissioning landscape, driven by evolving safety regulations, advances in technology, and a more nuanced understanding of environmental risks. Several factors have contributed to this transformation. First, regulatory reforms and the tightening of international safety standards have mandated more robust and systematic approaches to decommissioning. This has led to an increased reliance on sophisticated engineering solutions and enhanced decommissioning protocols that improve operational safety and efficiency. Secondly, technological innovation has reshaped traditional practices; novel dismantling techniques and automated robotic systems now complement manual operations, ensuring precision and reducing human exposure to hazardous materials.

Furthermore, the integration of data analytics and process automation has enabled operators to better predict challenges and dynamically adjust decommissioning strategies, thereby minimizing delays and cost overruns. Policy drivers focusing on sustainability and environmental protection have required operators to adopt more circular economy principles, ensuring that waste processing and material recycling are integral components of the decommissioning strategy. The shift towards immediate dismantling over extended safe storage, when feasible, is a direct consequence of these technological and regulatory imperatives. This dynamic environment underscores the need for decision-makers to balance the demands of cost, safety, and environmental impact in a context that is constantly redefining what safety and efficiency mean in nuclear decommissioning practices.

Key Segmentation Insights in Nuclear Decommissioning Market

A detailed examination of market segmentation reveals a multi-layered approach to understanding and catering to the diverse needs within nuclear decommissioning. The market is primarily segmented based on type, where approaches such as entombment, immediate dismantling, and safe storage are each explored. Within entombment, further nuances like in-situ disposal and on-site management offer varied pathways to managing nuclear waste. Additionally, segmentation by reactor type highlights the complexity of decommissioning different nuclear facilities, including boiling water reactors, fast breeder reactors, gas-cooled reactors, pressurized water reactors, and modern small modular reactors. Each reactor type comes with its unique set of challenges that require tailored technical strategies.

Moreover, capacity segmentation, which categorizes facilities into ranges such as 300-800 MWe, above 800 MWe, and below 300 MWe, reveals that project scale often dictates the level of technical and regulatory attention required. Significant insights are derived from technology-based segmentation, where the focus is on decontamination techniques, dismantling technologies, and waste processing and treatment capabilities. Each technological pathway influences operational efficiency and cost management across decommissioning operations. Similarly, application-based segmentation, covering industrial and medical isotope production facilities alongside nuclear power generation sites and research reactors, illustrates that the decommissioning methods must be adaptable to various operational contexts. Finally, segmentation based on end-users, whether government or state-owned entities versus the private sector or utilities, provides a nuanced view of investment, execution styles, and long-term stewardship expectations. These multiple segmentation viewpoints collectively underscore that a one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate, pushing industry stakeholders to adopt highly customized strategies that reflect the unique characteristics of each segment in the nuclear decommissioning market.

Based on Type, market is studied across Entombment, Immediate Dismantling, and Safe Storage. The Entombment is further studied across In-situ Disposal and On-site.

Based on Reactor Type, market is studied across Boiling Water Reactor, Fast Breeder Reactor, Gas Cooled Reactor, Pressurized Water Reactor, and Small Modular Reactors.

Based on Capacity, market is studied across 300-800 MWe, Above 800 MWe, and below 300 MWe.

Based on Technology, market is studied across Decontamination Techniques, Dismantling Technologies, and Waste Processing & Treatment.

Based on Application, market is studied across Industrial & Medical Isotope Production Facilities, Nuclear Power Generation Facilities, and Research Reactors & Test Facilities.

Based on End-Users, market is studied across Government/State-Owned Entities and Private Sector/Utilities.

Key Regional Insights Across the Global Decommissioning Arena

Geographical insights reveal that nuclear decommissioning strategies vary significantly across different regions, reflecting distinct regulatory environments, technological maturity, and market dynamics. In the Americas, a legacy of extensive nuclear power generation has resulted in sophisticated regulatory frameworks and consolidated decommissioning practices, emphasizing both environmental safeguards and economic efficiency. Meanwhile, the Europe, Middle East & Africa region exhibits a unique blend of longstanding nuclear traditions interlaced with emerging innovation hubs, where countries are actively modernizing their nuclear infrastructure while addressing legacy waste management issues. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid economic development and a growing emphasis on sustainable energy have spurred significant investments in nuclear technologies and decommissioning capabilities, fostering a landscape that balances ambitious growth with stringent safety mandates. Together, these regional insights illustrate that local regulatory nuances and market conditions play a crucial role in shaping decommissioning strategies, and global players must remain agile to adapt to the evolving dynamics of each region.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Key Company Insights Driving Innovation and Operational Excellence

The competitive landscape is enriched by the presence of a diverse array of leading companies that are at the forefront of nuclear decommissioning innovation and project execution. Industry giants such as ABB Ltd., AECOM Technology Corporation, and Alliant Energy Corporation have spearheaded initiatives to enhance operational efficiency through advanced technological integrations. Firms like AtkinsRealis Group Inc., ATS Corporation, and Babcock International Group PLC have built robust portfolios that reflect their long-standing commitment to safe dismantling processes and disruption minimization. The prowess of Bechtel Corporation and China National Nuclear Corporation in managing large-scale projects is matched by Dominion Energy, Inc. and EDF ENERGY LIMITED, who drive initiatives related to regulatory compliance and waste management. Enercon Services, Inc., EnergySolutions Inc., Exelon Corporation, and Fluor Corporation have all contributed to evolving best practices through continuous innovations in decommissioning technologies. Similarly, Framatome SA, GE Vernova, and Holtec International, Inc. continue to push the envelope with solutions that address both immediate and long-term decommissioning challenges. This competitive mix is further strengthened by specialized players like i3D robotics Ltd, KUKA AG, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Northstar Group Services, Inc., NUKEM Technologies Engineering Services GmbH by Muroosystems Corporation, NuScale Power, LLC, Ontario Power Generation Inc., Orano Technologies SA, Sellafield Ltd, Studsvik AB, Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation, Veolia Environnement SA, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Collectively, these companies not only provide a diverse array of technical solutions but also shape the industry's trajectory by setting benchmarks for safety, efficiency, and innovation in a complex regulatory environment.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Nuclear Decommissioning Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include ABB Ltd., AECOM Technology Corporation, Alliant Energy Corporation, AtkinsRealis Group Inc., ATS Corporation, Babcock International Group PLC, Bechtel Corporation, China National Nuclear Corporation, Dominion Energy, Inc., EDF ENERGY LIMITED, Enercon Services, Inc., EnergySolutions Inc., Exelon Corporation, Fluor Corporation, Framatome SA, GE Vernova, Holtec International, Inc., i3D robotics Ltd, KUKA AG, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Northstar Group Services, Inc., NUKEM Technologies Engineering Services GmbH by Muroosystems Corporation, NuScale Power, LLC, Ontario Power Generation Inc., Orano Technologies SA, Sellafield Ltd, Studsvik AB, Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation, Veolia Environnement SA, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders in Nuclear Decommissioning

Industry leaders are encouraged to leverage the insights presented to drive strategic investments and operational enhancements that align with current market demands. It is advisable to adopt integrated decommissioning platforms that utilize state-of-the-art robotics and automation to minimize risk and improve precision in dismantling activities. Enhancing collaboration with technology providers can bolster expertise in state-of-the-art decontamination and waste processing techniques. Furthermore, companies should invest in advanced data analytics tools to predict potential challenges and streamline project timelines. Polices that emphasize sustainable practices and effective stakeholder engagement will assist in aligning operational procedures with evolving regulatory standards. Lastly, expanding training programs and investing in human capital is critical, ensuring that the workforce is adept at handling next-generation decommissioning technologies and the evolving safety protocols that the modern landscape demands.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways from the Analysis

In summary, the evolving domain of nuclear decommissioning presents both significant opportunities and complex challenges. With a framework that encapsulates technological advancements, robust segmentation insights, and region-specific dynamics, stakeholders are better positioned to navigate a rapidly shifting marketplace. The analysis covers critical aspects, from the differentiation of decommissioning types and reactor categories to capacity considerations and technological innovations, thereby offering a comprehensive picture of the current state of affairs. Strategic insights into market segmentation reveal that customized, targeted approaches are necessary to address the unique challenges presented by varying reactor designs and regional regulatory environments. Furthermore, the participation of key global players enhances the industry's capacity for innovation and safe execution. Overall, the findings underline that coordinated global efforts, coupled with region-specific strategies, are central to meeting the demands of nuclear decommissioning in today's complex and dynamic energy sector.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

6. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Type

7. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Reactor Type

8. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Capacity

9. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Technology

10. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Application

11. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by End-Users

12. Americas Nuclear Decommissioning Market

13. Asia-Pacific Nuclear Decommissioning Market

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Nuclear Decommissioning Market

15. Competitive Landscape

Companies Mentioned

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â