¼¼°èÀÇ ³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ½ÃÀå
Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics
»óǰÄÚµå : 1793772
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 08¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 369 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 5,850 £Ü 8,183,000
PDF & Excel (Single User License) help
PDF & Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÆÄÀÏ ³» ÅØ½ºÆ®ÀÇ º¹»ç ¹× ºÙ¿©³Ö±â´Â °¡´ÉÇÏÁö¸¸, Ç¥/±×·¡ÇÁ µîÀº º¹»çÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â 1ȸ °¡´ÉÇϸç, Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§´Â ÆÄÀÏ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 17,550 £Ü 24,550,000
PDF & Excel (Global License to Company and its Fully-owned Subsidiaries) help
PDF & Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ ¹× 100% ÀÚȸ»çÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â 1Àδç 1ȸ °¡´ÉÇϸç, Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§´Â ÆÄÀÏ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 4¾ï 5,120¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ Àü¸Á

2024³â¿¡ 3¾ï 5,260¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â ³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³âºÎÅÍ 2030³â±îÁö CAGR 4.2%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 4¾ï 5,120¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ºÎ¹® Áß ÇϳªÀÎ ±â±¸´Â CAGR 4.8%¸¦ ±â·ÏÇÏ¸ç ºÐ¼® ±â°£ Á¾·á½Ã¿¡´Â 3¾ï 2,840¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ŰƮ ¹× ¼Ò¸ðǰ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGR 2.6%·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀåÀº ÃßÁ¤ 9,610¸¸ ´Þ·¯, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 7.8%·Î ¼ºÀå ¿¹Ãø

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 9,610¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ °æÁ¦ ´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ 2024³âºÎÅÍ 2030³â±îÁö CAGR 7.8%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â ¿¹Ãø ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð 9,300¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖ°í, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGRÀº °¢°¢ 1.7%¿Í 3.3%·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼­´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ CAGR 2.4%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ ³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ½ÃÀå - ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ°ú ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®

³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ÀÇ Áø´Ü Àü·«ÀÌ º¹ÀâÇØÁö´Â ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¹«¾ùÀϱî?

ºñÈ£ÁöŲ¸²ÇÁÁ¾(NHL)ÀÇ ¾ÆÇüÀÎ ³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾(RFL)Àº Àϼ± Ä¡·á ¿ä¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»¼º°ú Àç¹ß °æÇâÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Áø´Ü¿¡ Å« ¾î·Á¿òÀ» °Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ä¡·á°¡ ´õ¿í Ç¥ÀûÈ­µÇ°í ȯÀÚº°·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ­µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ä¡·á °áÁ¤À» µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â Áø´ÜÇÐÀº ºü¸£°Ô ¹ßÀüÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇöÀç RFLÀÇ Áø´Ü Àü·«Àº º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû È®ÀÎ, ¸é¿ªÇ¥ÇöÇü ºÐ·ù, À¯ÀüÇÐÀû ¹× ºÐÀÚ»ý¹°ÇÐÀû ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµ, ÷´Ü ¿µ»ó Áø´Ü ±â¼úÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ ´ÙÀÎÀÚ Æò°¡¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ³­Ä¡¼º Áúȯ°ú ¹ÝÀÀ¼º ¾ÆÇüÀ» Á¶±â¿¡ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ±¸ºÐÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â Çʿ伺À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Á¤¹Ð Áø´Ü µµ±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±âÁ¸ÀÇ »ý°Ë°ú ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­ÇÐÀº ¿©ÀüÈ÷ RFLÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ´Â µ¥ ±âÃʰ¡ µÇ°í ÀÖÁö¸¸, Ä¡·á ÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» ¾Ï½ÃÇÏ´Â ºÐÀÚ ½Ã±×´Ïó¸¦ °ËÃâÇÏ´Â µ¥´Â ÇѰ谡 ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, Ä¡·á ÀúÇ×¼º ¹× ¹«ÁøÇà »ýÁ¸¿¡ °ü¿©ÇÏ´Â EZH2, BCL2, CREBBPÀÇ °íÀ§Çè µ¹¿¬º¯À̸¦ È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇØ À¯ÀüÀÚ ¹ßÇö ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµ ¹× Â÷¼¼´ë ¿°±â¼­¿­ ºÐ¼®(NGS)ÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÐÀÚÁø´Ü¹ýÀº ÀÓ»óÀÇ¿¡°Ô ÀÓ»ó º´±â ºÐ·ùÀÇ Æ²À» ³Ñ¾î ȯÀÚ ºÐ·ùÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ±æÀ» Á¦°øÇϰí, »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Á¤º¸¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ °èÃþÈ­ ¹× ½Ç½Ã°£ Ä¡·á ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾î¶² Áø´Ü ¾ç½ÄÀÌ ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» Çü¼ºÇϰí Àִ°¡?

À¯¼¼Æ÷ ºÐ¼® ¹× Çü±¤ in situ hybridization(FISH)Àº ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾¿¡¼­ t(14;&18)°ú °°Àº Ư¡ÀûÀÎ ÀüÁ¸¦ °ËÃâÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¸ç, ¿À·§µ¿¾È ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´ÜÀÇ ÁÖÃàÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëµÇ¾î ¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ³­Ä¡¼º ÁúȯÀÇ °æ¿ì, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µµ±¸´Â ÇöÀç ´õ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ µ¹¿¬º¯ÀÌ »óȲÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â NGS ÆÐ³Î°ú ÇÔ²² »ç¿ëµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹½À´Ï´Ù. ¾×ü »ý°Ë, ƯÈ÷ ¼øÈ¯ Á¾¾ç DNA(ctDNA) ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµÀº ºñħ½ÀÀûÀ̰í Áúº´ ºÎÇÏ, Ŭ·Ð ÁøÈ­, ¹Ì¼¼ÀÜÁ¸º´º¯(MRD)À» ÃßÀûÇÏ´Â µ¥ À¯¿ëÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ RFL Áø´Ü¿¡ ħÅõÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, PET(¾çÀüÀÚ¹æ»ç¼±´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ)°ú CT(ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ)¸¦ °áÇÕÇÑ °Ë»ç(PET-CT)´Â Ä¡·á ¹ÝÀÀ¼º Æò°¡¿Í ³­Ä¡¼º ÁøÇàÀ» °¨ÁöÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ÇÙ½ÉÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ´ë»ç¼º Á¾¾ç ºÎÇÇ¿Í º´º¯ ÀüüÀÇ ÇØ´çÀ» Á¤·®È­ÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î ¿µ»ó ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿´Â RFL Àç¹ßÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ±× ¿¹Ãø °¡Ä¡¸¦ ¿¬±¸Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼Æ÷À¯ÀüÇÐÀû Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â ºñ±³ À¯Àüü ÇÏÀ̺긮µåÈ­(CGH) ¾î·¹ÀÌ¿Í µðÁöÅÐ ÇÙÇü ºÐ¼®ÀÌ ³­Ä¡¼º °ü·Ã ¿°»öü ÀÌ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±ÍÁßÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù ¸ÂÃãÈ­µÈ Ä¡·á °èȹ¿¡ ±â¿©Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Á¤¹ÐÀÇ·á¿Í µ¿¹ÝÁø´ÜÀº ½ÃÀå »óȲ¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í Àִ°¡?

RFL Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ EZH2 ¾ïÁ¦Á¦, PI3K ¾ïÁ¦Á¦, ÀÌÁ߯¯À̼ºÇ×ü µî Ç¥Àû Ä¡·áÁ¦ÀÇ µîÀåÀº Áø´Ü¾à ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀå°ú Çõ½Å ±Ëµµ¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½Å±Ô Ä¡·áÁ¦ÀÇ À¯È¿¼º ÆÇ´ÜÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â µ¿¹ÝÁø´Ü¾à(CDx)ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Æ Á¦¾à»ç¿Í Áø´Ü¾à ±â¾÷Àº ±× ¾î´À ¶§º¸´Ù ±ä¹ÐÇÑ Çù·Â °ü°è¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­·Î ÀÎÇØ ¸ÖƼÇ÷º½º ºÐ¼® ¹× ¸ÂÃãÇü NGS ÆÐ³ÎÀ» ÅëÇØ ¿¹Ãø ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿¸¦ °ËÁõÇÏ´Â CDx ŰƮ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ±ÞÁõÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ, RFL Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ CAR-T ¼¼Æ÷ Ä¡·á ¹× ±âŸ ¸é¿ª Á¾¾çÇÐ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¾¾ç µ¹¿¬º¯ÀÌ ºÎÇÏ(TMB), PD-L1 ¹ßÇö, ¹è¾Æ Á᫐ B ¼¼Æ÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϸµÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á Àü Áø´Ü Æò°¡°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Áø´Ü ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο쿡´Â AI Áö¿ø º´¸® ¹× »ý¹°Á¤º¸ÇÐ Ç÷§ÆûÀÌ ÅëÇյǾî ÀÖ¾î ¸ÖÆ¼¿À¹Í µ¥ÀÌÅͼ¼Æ®¸¦ ÇØ¼®Çϰí À§Çèµµ °èÃþÈ­ ¸ðµ¨À» »ý¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µµ±¸´Â Á¾¾ç ÀÌÁú¼º, ÀáÀçÀû ³»¼º °æ·Î, ½Ç½Ã°£ ¹ÝÀÀ ¿¹Ãø µî ³­Ä¡¼º ȯÀÚ °ü¸®¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ±â´É¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» °­È­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ¿äÀÎÀº?

³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº ºñÈ£ÁöŲ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ ¹ßº´·ü Áõ°¡, ³­Ä¡¼º ¹× Àç¹ß »ç·Ê Áõ°¡, ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿ À¯µµ Áø´ÜÀ» ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏ´Â Ä¡·á ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀÎÀÇ È®´ë µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö »óÈ£ ¿¬°üµÈ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁÖµµµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾Àº Àüü ºñÈ£ÁöŲ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ÀÇ ¾à 20%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇϸç, »ó´ç¼ö°¡ ³­Ä¡¼º ´Ü°è·Î ÁøÇàµÇ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Á¶±â¿¡ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô °ËÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ù Ä¡·á ÈÄ 24°³¿ù À̳»¿¡ Àç¹ßÇÑ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄ´Â ÁÁÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »ç·Ê¸¦ Àû½Ã¿¡ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº Ä¡·áÀû °³ÀÔ¿¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Áø´Ü¾àÀÌ ¸ÂÃãÇü Á¾¾çÇÐ °¡Ä¡»ç½½¿¡ ÆíÀԵǴ °Íµµ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¼¼¸¦ °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. FDA ¹× EMA¿Í °°Àº ±ÔÁ¦ ±â°üÀº »õ·Î¿î Ä¡·á ¹× °ü·Ã Áø´Ü ¾àǰ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å¼ÓÇÑ ½ÂÀÎÀ» ºÎ¿©Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, »óȯ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â Á¡Á¡ ´õ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±È£Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè, ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¹ðÅ© ±â¹Ý, Áß°³¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí, Á¶Á÷ ÀúÀå¼Ò ¹× ȯÀÚ µ¥ÀÌÅͼ¼Æ®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±ÙÀÌ È®´ëµÇ¸é¼­ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸¶Ä¿ Ž»ö ¹× ºÐ¼®¹ý °³¹ßÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀÌ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾Ï ºÐ¾ß°¡ ¸ÂÃãÇü Ä¡·á ¸ðµ¨·Î ´õ¿í ¹ßÀüÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ³­Ä¡¼º ¿©Æ÷¼º ¸²ÇÁÁ¾ Áø´Ü ½ÃÀåÀº ±â¼ú ÁÖµµÀÇ °­·ÂÇÑ ¼ºÀå¼¼¸¦ À̾ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÎ¹®

Á¦Ç°(Àåºñ, ŰƮ, ¼Ò¸ðǰ), ¹æ¹ý(¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­Çйý, In-situ ÇÏÀ̺긮´ÙÀÌÁ¦À̼ǹý, ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò ¿¬¼â ¹ÝÀÀ¹ý, ±âŸ ¹æ¹ý), ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ(º´¿ø ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, Áø´Ü ¼¾ÅÍ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, ±âŸ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ)

Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±â¾÷ »ç·Ê

AI ÅëÇÕ

¿ì¸®´Â °ËÁõµÈ Àü¹®°¡ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷¿Í AI ÅøÀ» ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀå Á¤º¸¿Í °æÀï Á¤º¸¸¦ Çõ½ÅÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Global Industry Analysts´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ LLM ¹× ¾÷°èº° SLM Äõ¸®¸¦ µû¸£´Â ´ë½Å ºñµð¿À ±â·Ï, ºí·Î±×, °Ë»ö ¿£Áø Á¶»ç, ¹æ´ëÇÑ ¾çÀÇ ±â¾÷, Á¦Ç°/¼­ºñ½º, ½ÃÀå µ¥ÀÌÅÍ µî ¼¼°è Àü¹®°¡·ÎºÎÅÍ ¼öÁýÇÑ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ¸®Æ÷ÁöÅ丮¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

°ü¼¼ ¿µÇâ °è¼ö

Global Industry Analysts´Â º»»ç ¼ÒÀçÁö, Á¦Á¶°ÅÁ¡, ¼öÃâÀÔ(¿ÏÁ¦Ç° ¹× OEM)À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï·Â º¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¹ÀâÇÏ°í ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ¸ÅÃâ¿ø°¡(COGS) Áõ°¡, ¼öÀͼº Ç϶ô, °ø±Þ¸Á ÀçÆí µî ¹Ì½ÃÀû, °Å½ÃÀû ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ Áß¿¡¼­µµ ƯÈ÷ °æÀï»çµé¿¡°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå °æÀï

KSM
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Global Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics Market to Reach US$451.2 Million by 2030

The global market for Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics estimated at US$352.6 Million in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$451.2 Million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 4.2% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Instruments, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 4.8% CAGR and reach US$328.4 Million by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Kits & Consumables segment is estimated at 2.6% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$96.1 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 7.8% CAGR

The Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics market in the U.S. is estimated at US$96.1 Million in the year 2024. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$93.0 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 7.8% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 1.7% and 3.3% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 2.4% CAGR.

Global Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics Market - Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

Why Are Diagnostic Strategies for Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Becoming More Complex?

Refractory follicular lymphoma (RFL), a subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its resistance to frontline treatment regimens and its tendency to relapse. As therapies become more targeted and patient-specific, the diagnostics supporting these treatment decisions have had to evolve rapidly. Diagnostic strategies for RFL now depend on a multifactorial assessment, combining histopathological confirmation, immunophenotyping, genetic and molecular profiling, and advanced imaging techniques. The need to accurately distinguish refractory disease from responsive subtypes at early stages is driving substantial interest in precision diagnostic tools.

Traditional biopsy and immunohistochemistry remain foundational in confirming RFL, but limitations arise when trying to detect molecular signatures that suggest treatment resistance. As a result, gene expression profiling and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are increasingly employed to identify high-risk mutations in EZH2, BCL2, and CREBBP, which are implicated in treatment resistance and poor progression-free survival. These molecular diagnostics are offering clinicians new pathways to classify patients beyond clinical staging, fostering the move toward biologically informed stratification and real-time therapeutic monitoring.

Which Diagnostic Modalities Are Shaping Clinical Decision-Making?

Flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have long served as mainstays in lymphoma diagnostics, helping detect hallmark translocations like t(14;18) in follicular lymphoma. However, in the case of refractory disease, these tools are now often used in conjunction with NGS panels, which provide a broader mutational landscape. Liquid biopsies-particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling-are gaining ground in RFL diagnostics due to their non-invasive nature and utility in tracking disease burden, clonal evolution, and minimal residual disease (MRD).

Additionally, positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) continues to play a central role in assessing treatment response and detecting refractory progression. Emerging imaging biomarkers that quantify metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis are being investigated for their predictive value in RFL recurrence. On the cytogenetic front, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays and digital karyotyping are providing valuable information on chromosomal abnormalities associated with refractory behavior, contributing to more tailored therapeutic planning.

How Are Precision Medicine and Companion Diagnostics Influencing the Market Landscape?

The rise of targeted therapies such as EZH2 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and bispecific antibodies in RFL treatment is heavily influencing the growth and innovation trajectory of the diagnostics market. With new therapeutic agents often requiring companion diagnostics (CDx) for efficacy determination, pharmaceutical and diagnostic firms are collaborating more closely than ever. This shift has created a surge in demand for CDx kits that validate predictive biomarkers through multiplex assays and custom NGS panels.

Moreover, the increasing adoption of CAR-T cell therapy and other immuno-oncology platforms in RFL treatment requires comprehensive pre-treatment diagnostic assessments, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and germinal center B-cell profiling. Diagnostic workflows are also integrating AI-assisted pathology and bioinformatics platforms capable of interpreting multi-omic datasets and generating risk stratification models. Such tools enhance decision-making by offering insights into tumor heterogeneity, potential resistance pathways, and real-time response prediction-features critical in managing refractory cases.

What Factors Are Driving the Growth of the Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics Market?

The growth in the refractory follicular lymphoma diagnostics market is driven by multiple interrelated factors, including the increasing incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the rising rate of refractory and relapsed cases, and expanding treatment pipelines that require biomarker-guided diagnostics. With follicular lymphoma comprising approximately 20% of all NHL cases, and a significant fraction progressing to refractory stages, the demand for early and accurate detection modalities is intensifying. In particular, patients who relapse within 24 months of initial therapy exhibit poorer prognosis, making timely identification of such cases crucial for therapeutic intervention.

The integration of diagnostics into the value chain of personalized oncology is also accelerating market momentum. Regulatory bodies such as the FDA and EMA are granting fast-track approvals to diagnostics linked with novel therapies, while reimbursement frameworks are increasingly favoring biomarker-based approaches. Furthermore, rising investments in clinical trials, biobank infrastructure, and translational research are expanding access to tissue repositories and patient datasets, fueling innovation in biomarker discovery and assay development. As the oncology field moves further toward tailored care models, the market for refractory follicular lymphoma diagnostics will continue to experience robust and technology-driven growth.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Diagnostics market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:

Product (Instruments, Kits & Consumables); Method (Immunohistochemistry Method, In Situ Hybridization Method, Polymerase Chain Reaction Method, Other Methods); End-Use (Hospitals End-Use, Diagnostic Centers End-Use, Other End-Uses)

Geographic Regions/Countries:

World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; Spain; Russia; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific (Australia; India; South Korea; and Rest of Asia-Pacific); Latin America (Argentina; Brazil; Mexico; and Rest of Latin America); Middle East (Iran; Israel; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; and Rest of Middle East); and Africa.

Select Competitors (Total 36 Featured) -

AI INTEGRATIONS

We're transforming market and competitive intelligence with validated expert content and AI tools.

Instead of following the general norm of querying LLMs and Industry-specific SLMs, we built repositories of content curated from domain experts worldwide including video transcripts, blogs, search engines research, and massive amounts of enterprise, product/service, and market data.

TARIFF IMPACT FACTOR

Our new release incorporates impact of tariffs on geographical markets as we predict a shift in competitiveness of companies based on HQ country, manufacturing base, exports and imports (finished goods and OEM). This intricate and multifaceted market reality will impact competitors by increasing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), reducing profitability, reconfiguring supply chains, amongst other micro and macro market dynamics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

IV. COMPETITION

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â