In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø(-2034³â) : À¯Çü, Á¦Ç°, ¼­ºñ½º, ±â¼ú, ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®, ¿ëµµ, Àç·á À¯Çü, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, ´Ü°è
In Vivo Toxicology Market Analysis and Forecast to 2034: Type, Product, Services, Technology, Component, Application, Material Type, End User, Stage
»óǰÄÚµå : 1699184
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Insight Services LLC
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 04¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 462 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 4,750 £Ü 6,740,000
Single User License help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ®ÀÇ Copy & Paste °¡´ÉÇϸç, Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 5,750 £Ü 8,159,000
Site License help
PDF, Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷(±¹°¡)ÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ®ÀÇ Copy & Paste °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Àμ⠰¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 6,750 £Ü 9,578,000
Enterprise License help
PDF, Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ÀÇ Àü ¼¼°è ¸ðµçºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÅØ½ºÆ®ÀÇ Copy & Paste °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Àμ⠰¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â 62¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡¼­ 2034³â¿¡´Â 94¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î È®´ëÇϸç, CAGR ¾à 4.2%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀåÀº ÁÖ·Î µ¿¹° ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹°ÁúÀÇ »ýü³» ¾Ç¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀǾàǰ °³¹ß, È­ÇÐÀû ¾ÈÀü¼º, ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö¿¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. »ý¸í°øÇÐ ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀü, ÀǾàǰ ¿¬±¸°³¹ß Áõ°¡, ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ¾ÈÀü ±ÔÁ¦°¡ ½ÃÀåÀ» ÁÖµµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ´ëü °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ Çõ½Å°ú À±¸®Àû °í·Á°¡ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í º¸´Ù ¿¹ÃøÀûÀ̰í ÀεµÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç Á¢±Ù¹ýÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå °³¿ä

In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀåÀº ÁÖ·Î Á¦¾à ¹× »ý¸í°øÇÐ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ÀüÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î °ß°íÇÑ ¼ºÀå¼¼¸¦ º¸À̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼³Ä¡·ù ±â¹Ý ºÎ¹®ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀ» Áö¹èÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±× ÁÖ¿ä ÀÌÀ¯´Â µ¶¼º Å×½ºÆ®¿¡ ¼³Ä¡·ù°¡ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÇ¸ç È®¸³µÈ ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÇ °¡¿ë¼º ¶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¼³Ä¡·ù, ƯÈ÷ ¸¶¿ì½º¿Í Áã´Â Àΰ£°ú À¯ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î À¯»çÇÏ°í ±× »ç¿ëÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ´Â °ú°Å µ¥ÀÌÅͰ¡ dzºÎÇϹǷΠ¼±È£µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¿ìÀ§´Â ÀǾàǰ ½ÂÀÎ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ µ¿¹°½ÇÇèÀ» Àǹ«È­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°Ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ´õ¿í °­È­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾ó·è¸»°ú ºñÆ÷À¯·ù ¸ðµ¨°ú °°Àº »õ·Î¿î ÇÏÀ§ ºÎ¹®Àº ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼º°ú À±¸®Àû ÀÌÁ¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÁÖ¸ñÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÇÏÀ§ ºÎ¹®Àº ºü¸¥ °³¹ß ÀλçÀÌÆ®¿Í °í¼º´É ½ºÅ©¸®´× ´É·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿© Ãʱ⠴ܰèÀÇ ½Å¾à °³¹ß ¹× ȯ°æ µ¶¼º Æò°¡¿¡ º¯È­¸¦ °¡Á®¿Ã ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î »ýü³» °Ë»çÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú À±¸®Àû °í·Á»çÇ×ÀÌ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °­È­µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ½ÅÈï ¸ðµ¨Àº ½ÃÀå ȯ°æ¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í Çõ½ÅÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ¸ç ¿ëµµ¸¦ È®´ëÇÒ Áغñ°¡ µÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­
À¯Çü ±Þ¼ºµ¶¼º°Ë»ç, ¸¸¼ºµ¶¼º°Ë»ç, ¾Æ¸¸¼ºµ¶¼º°Ë»ç, ¹ß»ý-»ý½Äµ¶¼º°Ë»ç, ¹ß¾Ï¼º°Ë»ç
Á¦Ç°¼Ò°³ Àåºñ, µ¿¹°¸ðµ¨, ½Ã¾à, ŰƮ, ½Ã¾à, ŰƮ
¼­ºñ½º ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ ¼­ºñ½º, ÀüÀÓ»ó °Ë»ç ¼­ºñ½º
±â¼ú CRISPR, RNA °£¼·, °í¼º´É ½ºÅ©¸®´×
±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î, Çϵå¿þ¾î
¿ëµµ Á¦¾à, »ý¸í°øÇÐ, È­Àåǰ, ½Äǰ»ê¾÷, È­ÇÐ »ê¾÷, Á¦¾à, ¹ÙÀÌ¿À»ê¾÷
Àç·á À¯Çü ¹ÙÀÌ¿À, È­ÇÐ
ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ ¿¬±¸±â°ü,À§Å¹¿¬±¸±â°ü,Á¦¾àȸ»ç,¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÅ×Å©³î·¯Áö ±â¾÷
´Ü°è Ž»ö, ÀüÀÓ»ó, ÀÓ»ó, ½ÃÆÇ ÈÄ Á¶»ç

In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀåÀº Á¦¾à ¹× »ý¸í°øÇÐ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀÌ Å©°í, È­ÇÐ ¹× ½Äǰ »ê¾÷¿¡¼­ Å« ±â¿©¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »óȲÀº Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¾ÈÀü¼º Æò°¡¿Í ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ Çü¼ºµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹Ì´Â ÷´ÜÀÎ ¿¬±¸ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼±µµÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¸¦ À¯ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀº ÀǾàǰ °³¹ß ¹× ¿¬±¸ Çõ½Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ »ó´çÇÑ ¼ºÀå¼¼¸¦ º¸À̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾÷°è ¼±µÎÁÖÀÚµéÀº Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ¿Í °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ±â¼úÀû Áøº¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÔÁö¸¦ °­È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °æÀïÀÇ ¿ªÇÐÀº ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°Ç°ú µ¿¹° »ç¿ëÀ» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ´ëü Å×½ºÆ® ¹æ¹ýÀÇ Ãß±¸¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, FDA ¹× EMA¿Í °°Àº ±ÔÁ¦±â°üÀÌ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀ» ¿ËÈ£ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ±â¾÷Àº º¸´Ù ¿¹ÃøÀûÀ̰í ÀεµÀûÀÎ µ¶¼ºÇÐ ¸ðµ¨ °³¹ß¿¡ ÁýÁßÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. -on-a-chip°ú °°Àº ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °Ë»ç ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ¿¡ Çõ¸íÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å³ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ¸ç, ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ ±ËÀûÀº À¯¸ÁÇØ º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À±¸®Àû ¿ì·Á¿Í ÷´Ü ±â¼úÀÇ ³ôÀº ºñ¿ë µîÀÇ °úÁ¦µµ ³²¾Æ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°ú ÅõÀÚ°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ »óȲÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ ¹× ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ

In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀåÀº »ý¸í°øÇÐ ¹× Á¦¾à ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹ßÀü¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ¼ºÀåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä µ¿ÇâÀº Á¤¹ÐÀÇ·áÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ °­Á¶µÇ¸é¼­ ¸ÂÃãÇü Ä¡·áÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ µ¶¼ºÇÐ Æò°¡°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±ÔÁ¦±â°üÀº ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ» °­È­ÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù ¾ö°ÝÇÑ »ýü³» °Ë»ç ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, CRISPR ¹× ÷´Ü À̹Ì¡ ±â¼ú°ú °°Àº »õ·Î¿î ±â¼úÀº µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú È¿À²¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀº ÀǾàǰ °³¹ß¿¡ ¼Ò¿äµÇ´Â ½Ã°£°ú ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨ÇÏ°í ½ÃÀå °³¹ß¿¡ À¯¸®ÇÑ ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸¸¼ºÁúȯ Áõ°¡¿Í ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Å¾à °³¹ß ±¸»óÀÇ ±ÞÁõÀº ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ ÃËÁøÁ¦ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ µ¿¹°½ÇÇèÀ» ÁÙÀ̰í À±¸® ±âÁذú ±¹¹Î Á¤¼­¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â ´ëü ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½Éµµ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿©±â¿¡´Â In Vivo °Ë»ç¸¦ º¸¿ÏÇϴ ÷´Ü in vitro ¸ðµ¨ °³¹ßµµ Æ÷ÇԵ˴ϴÙ. ÀÌ ºÐ¾ß¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷Àº °æÀï ¿ìÀ§¸¦ È®º¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±âȸ¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÇ·á ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í ¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀÎ ÅõÀÚ Áõ°¡´Â ƯÈ÷ ÀÇ·á Çö´ëÈ­°¡ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§°¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ½ÅÈï ±¹°¡ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ½ÃÀå È®´ë¸¦ ´õ¿í ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾ïÁ¦¿äÀΰú °úÁ¦

In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå¿¡´Â ¸î °¡Áö µÎµå·¯Áø ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀΰú °úÁ¦°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áß¿äÇÑ °úÁ¦ Áß Çϳª´Â µ¿¹°½ÇÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À±¸®Àû ¿ì·Á·Î ÀÎÇØ ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ÀÇ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÌ °­È­µÇ°í ´ëü ½ÃÇè¹ýÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿¬±¸¿Í ÀûÀÀ¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ÀÌ´Â Áß¼Ò±â¾÷¿¡°Ô´Â À庮ÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ In Vivo °Ë»ç´Â Àü¹® ½Ã¼³°ú ¼÷·ÃµÈ ÀηÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϹǷΠºñ¿ëÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ µé°í, ½ÅÈï ½ÃÀå°ú ¼Ò±Ô¸ð ±â¾÷¿¡¼­´Â Á¢±ÙÇÏ±â ¾î·Æ½À´Ï´Ù. »ý¹°ÇÐÀû ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ º¹À⼺Àº °á°ú ÇØ¼®À» ´õ¿í º¹ÀâÇÏ°Ô ¸¸µé°í, °í±Þ Àü¹® Áö½ÄÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, Àϰü¼º ¾ø´Â °á°ú¸¦ ÃÊ·¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Áö¿ª¸¶´Ù ´Ù¸¥ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°ÇÀº Á¦Ç° ½ÂÀÎÀ» Áö¿¬½Ã۰í ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠ºñ¿ëÀ» Áõ°¡½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î º¸´Ù ¿¹ÃøÀûÀ̰í Àΰ£°ú À¯»çÇÑ ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ In Vivo ¹æ¹ý·Ð¿¡ µµÀüÀÌ µÇ°í Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ Çõ½Å°ú °ËÁõ ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿äÀεéÀº ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀ» ÀúÇØÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦2Àå °³¿ä

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå¿¡ °üÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä ÀλçÀÌÆ®

Á¦4Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå Àü¸Á

Á¦5Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå Àü·«

Á¦6Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð

Á¦7Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°

Á¦8Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : Á¦Ç°º°

Á¦9Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : ¼­ºñ½ºº°

Á¦10Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : ±â¼úº°

Á¦11Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°

Á¦12Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

Á¦13Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : Àç·á À¯Çüº°

Á¦14Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

Á¦15Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : ´Ü°èº°

Á¦16Àå In Vivo µ¶¼ºÇÐ ½ÃÀå : Áö¿ªº°

Á¦17Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

Á¦18Àå ±â¾÷ °³¿ä

KSA
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

In Vivo Toxicology Market is anticipated to expand from $6.2 billion in 2024 to $9.4 billion by 2034, growing at a CAGR of approximately 4.2%. The market encompasses the study of adverse effects of substances on living organisms, primarily using animal models. It is pivotal for drug development, chemical safety, and regulatory compliance. The market is driven by advancements in biotechnology, increasing pharmaceutical R&D, and stringent safety regulations. Innovations in alternative testing methods and ethical considerations are shaping market dynamics, promoting the development of more predictive and humane testing approaches.

Market Overview:

The In Vivo Toxicology Market is experiencing robust expansion, primarily driven by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors' increasing demand for preclinical testing. The rodent-based segment dominates the market, largely due to its extensive use in toxicity testing and the availability of well-established protocols. Rodents, particularly mice and rats, are preferred due to their genetic similarities to humans and the wealth of historical data supporting their use. This segment's dominance is further reinforced by regulatory requirements mandating animal testing for drug approval processes. Emerging sub-segments, such as zebrafish and non-mammalian models, are gaining attention due to their cost-effectiveness and ethical advantages. These sub-segments offer rapid developmental insights and high-throughput screening capabilities, potentially transforming early-stage drug discovery and environmental toxicity assessments. As technological advancements continue to enhance the precision and ethical considerations of in vivo testing, these emerging models are poised to significantly impact the market landscape, fostering innovation and expanding applications.

Market Segmentation
TypeAcute Toxicity Testing, Chronic Toxicity Testing, Sub-chronic Toxicity Testing, Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Testing, Carcinogenicity Testing
ProductInstruments, Animal Models, Reagents and Kits
ServicesConsulting Services, Preclinical Testing Services
TechnologyCRISPR, RNA Interference, High-Throughput Screening
ComponentSoftware, Hardware
ApplicationPharmaceuticals, Biotechnology, Cosmetics, Food Industry, Chemical Industry
Material TypeBiologicals, Chemicals
End UserResearch Institutes, Contract Research Organizations, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies
StageDiscovery, Preclinical, Clinical, Post-market Surveillance

The in vivo toxicology market is predominantly influenced by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, with significant contributions from chemical and food industries. This landscape is shaped by the increasing demand for comprehensive safety assessments and regulatory compliance. North America maintains a leading position due to its advanced research infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, while Asia-Pacific is witnessing substantial growth fueled by rising investments in drug development and innovation. Major industry players are enhancing their market presence through strategic collaborations and technological advancements in testing methodologies. Competitive dynamics are influenced by stringent regulatory requirements and the pursuit of alternative testing methods to reduce animal use. Companies are focusing on the development of more predictive and humane toxicological models, spurred by regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA advocating for such innovations. The future trajectory of the market appears promising, with advancements in technologies such as CRISPR and organ-on-a-chip expected to revolutionize traditional testing paradigms. However, challenges such as ethical concerns and the high cost of advanced technologies remain, necessitating ongoing innovation and investment.

Geographical Overview:

The In Vivo Toxicology Market is witnessing varied growth patterns across different regions. North America leads the market with advanced research facilities and substantial funding for toxicological studies. The presence of key pharmaceutical companies further propels market growth. Europe follows, characterized by stringent regulatory frameworks that necessitate comprehensive in vivo testing. These regulations drive demand for innovative toxicology solutions. In Asia Pacific, rapid industrialization and increasing pharmaceutical activities contribute to market expansion. The region's focus on improving healthcare infrastructure also plays a crucial role. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa show emerging potential, with growing awareness of in vivo testing's importance. In Latin America, government initiatives to enhance research capabilities are notable. Meanwhile, the Middle East & Africa are investing in healthcare advancements, recognizing the value of in vivo toxicology in ensuring drug safety and efficacy.

Recent Developments:

In recent months, the In Vivo Toxicology Market has witnessed several noteworthy developments. Firstly, Charles River Laboratories announced a strategic acquisition of a European-based toxicology services provider, aiming to enhance its global service capabilities. Secondly, a significant partnership between Covance and a leading biotech firm was established to co-develop advanced in vivo toxicology testing methods, promising to expedite drug development timelines. Thirdly, the market saw an innovative product launch by Envigo, introducing a new line of genetically engineered animal models designed to improve the accuracy of toxicological assessments. Additionally, the sector experienced regulatory updates, with the FDA releasing new guidelines to streamline the approval process for in vivo toxicology testing protocols, thereby potentially reducing time-to-market for new pharmaceuticals. Lastly, a notable investment was made by a consortium of venture capital firms into a startup specializing in AI-driven in vivo toxicology analytics, highlighting the growing interest in integrating cutting-edge technology to enhance research outcomes.

Key Trends and Drivers:

The in vivo toxicology market is experiencing growth fueled by advancements in biotechnology and pharmaceutical research. A key trend is the increased emphasis on precision medicine, which necessitates comprehensive toxicological assessments to ensure the safety of tailored therapies. Regulatory bodies are intensifying their scrutiny, driving demand for more rigorous in vivo testing protocols. Emerging technologies, such as CRISPR and advanced imaging techniques, are enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of toxicological studies. These innovations are reducing the time and cost associated with drug development, creating lucrative opportunities for market players. The rise in chronic diseases and the consequent surge in drug discovery initiatives are substantial drivers for this market. Furthermore, there is a growing focus on alternative methods that reduce animal testing, aligning with ethical standards and public sentiment. This includes the development of sophisticated in vitro models that complement in vivo studies. Companies investing in these areas are likely to gain competitive advantages. The increasing global investment in healthcare infrastructure and research is further propelling market expansion, particularly in developing regions where healthcare modernization is a priority.

Restraints and Challenges:

The in vivo toxicology market encounters several prominent restraints and challenges. One significant challenge is the ethical concerns surrounding animal testing, which has led to increased regulatory scrutiny and the development of alternative testing methods. This shift necessitates substantial investment in research and adaptation, posing a barrier for smaller enterprises. Additionally, the high cost of in vivo studies, due to the need for specialized facilities and skilled personnel, limits accessibility for emerging markets and smaller companies. The complexity of biological systems further complicates the interpretation of results, requiring advanced expertise and potentially leading to inconsistent outcomes. Moreover, stringent regulatory requirements across different regions can delay product approvals and increase compliance costs. Finally, there is a growing demand for more predictive and human-relevant models, which challenges traditional in vivo methodologies and requires ongoing innovation and validation efforts. These factors collectively impede the rapid progression of the in vivo toxicology market.

Key Companies:

Charles River Laboratories, Envigo, Taconic Biosciences, Harlan Laboratories, Genoway, Crown Bioscience, The Jackson Laboratory, Trans Cure bio Services, Inotiv, Biomere, Vivo Bio Tech, Pharmaron, Syngene International, Labcorp Drug Development, Wu Xi App Tec, Cyagen Biosciences, Chem Partner, Eurofins Scientific, Toxikon, Biocytogen

Sources:

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, National Institutes of Health (NIH), World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - Chemicals and Biotechnology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Toxicology, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), Society of Toxicology, National Toxicology Program, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), International Union of Toxicology, Johns Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, University of California, Davis - School of Veterinary Medicine, Harvard University - Department of Environmental Health, International Conference on Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Society for In Vitro Biology, European Society of Toxicology In Vitro, American College of Toxicology Annual Meeting, International Conference on Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences

Research Scope:

Our research scope provides comprehensive market data, insights, and analysis across a variety of critical areas. We cover Local Market Analysis, assessing consumer demographics, purchasing behaviors, and market size within specific regions to identify growth opportunities. Our Local Competition Review offers a detailed evaluation of competitors, including their strengths, weaknesses, and market positioning. We also conduct Local Regulatory Reviews to ensure businesses comply with relevant laws and regulations. Industry Analysis provides an in-depth look at market dynamics, key players, and trends. Additionally, we offer Cross-Segmental Analysis to identify synergies between different market segments, as well as Production-Consumption and Demand-Supply Analysis to optimize supply chain efficiency. Our Import-Export Analysis helps businesses navigate global trade environments by evaluating trade flows and policies. These insights empower clients to make informed strategic decisions, mitigate risks, and capitalize on market opportunities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1: In Vivo Toxicology Market Overview

2: Executive Summary

3: Premium Insights on the Market

4: In Vivo Toxicology Market Outlook

5: In Vivo Toxicology In Vivo Toxicology Market Strategy

6: In Vivo Toxicology Market Size

7: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Type

8: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Product

9: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Services

10: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Technology

11: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Component

12: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Application

13: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Material Type

14: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by End User

15: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Stage

16: In Vivo Toxicology Market, by Region

17: Competitive Landscape

18: Company Profiles

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â