¼¼°èÀÇ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2024³â¿¡ 185¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú°í, 2030³â¿¡´Â 469¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ¸ç, 2030³â±îÁöÀÇ CAGRÀº 16.73%¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³¾ Àü¸ÁÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
½ÃÀå °³¿ä | |
---|---|
¿¹Ãø ±â°£ | 2026-2030³â |
½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð : 2024³â | 185¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯ |
½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð : 2030³â | 469¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯ |
CAGR(2025-2030³â) | 16.73% |
±Þ¼ºÀå ºÎ¹® | BFSI |
ÃÖ´ë ½ÃÀå | ºÏ¹Ì |
±âÁ¸ÀÇ °æ°è ±â¹Ý º¸¾È ¸ðµ¨°ú ´Þ¸®, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³´Â Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ³»ºÎ ¶Ç´Â ¿ÜºÎ¿¡ »ó°ü¾øÀÌ »ç¿ëÀÚ³ª ÀåÄ¡°¡ º»ÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í °¡Á¤ÇÏÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. ¸ðµç ¾×¼¼½º ¿äûÀº Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁõ, ½ÂÀÎ ¹× ¾ÏÈ£ÈµÇ¾î °ø°Ý Ç¥¸éÀ» Å©°Ô ÁÙÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Á¶Á÷ÀÌ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ¼ºñ½º, ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹« ¹× BYOD(Bring-Your-Own-Device) ȯ°æÀ» äÅÃÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®´Â º¹ÀâÇÑ ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇÑ È®Àå °¡´ÉÇϰí ÀûÀÀ·Â ÀÖ´Â ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â »çÀ̹ö À§Çù°ú µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ä§ÇØ´Â ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀÎÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ID, ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ® ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ Ç¥ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â °ø°ÝÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¶Á÷Àº »çÀü ¿¹¹æÀûÀÎ º¸¾È ¸ðµ¨·Î ÀüȯÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. GDPR, HIPAA ¹× CCPA¿Í °°Àº ±ÔÁ¦ Àǹ«µµ ±â¾÷µéÀÌ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®¿Í °°Àº º¸´Ù ¾ö°ÝÇÑ º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ äÅÃÇϵµ·Ï ¹Ð¾îºÙÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±ÝÀ¶ ¼ºñ½º, ÀÇ·á, ¼Ò¸Å ¹× Á¦Á¶¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾÷Á¾ÀÇ ±â¾÷µéÀÌ »ç¿ëÀÚ ID, ³×Æ®¿öÅ©, ¿ëµµ ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇØ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¿øÄ¢À» ºü¸£°Ô ÅëÇÕÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ µðÁöÅÐ Àüȯ ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºê¿Í ºÐ»êµÈ ÀηÂÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ±âÁ¸ º¸¾È °æ°è°¡ ¹«ÀǹÌÇØÁö¸é¼ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® µµÀÔÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ °¡¼Óȵǰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Àü ¼¼°è Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀåÀº Çõ½Å°ú »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ Áõ°¡¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î °·ÂÇÑ ¼ºÀåÀ» º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀº ´ÙÁß ¿ä¼Ò ÀÎÁõ, ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î ¼¼ºÐÈ, ID ¹× ¾×¼¼½º °ü¸®, ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ® º¸¾È, ½Ç½Ã°£ ºÐ¼®À» °áÇÕÇÑ ÅëÇÕ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® Ç÷§ÆûÀ» °³¹ßÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº È®À强°ú Àü°³ ¿ëÀ̼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÁÖ¸ñÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷µéÀÌ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È ż¼¸¦ °ÈÇÏ°í ³»ºÎ À§ÇùÀ» ÁÙÀÌ·Á°í ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä´Â ±âÇϱ޼öÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. Àΰø Áö´É ¹× ¸Ó½Å ·¯´×ÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀüÀº ÀûÀÀÇü ¾×¼¼½º Á¦¾î ¹× ½Ç½Ã°£ À§Çù ŽÁö¸¦ ´õ¿í Áö¿øÇÏ¿© ÁøÈÇÏ´Â µðÁöÅÐ ¹Ì·¡¿¡¼ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®¸¦ ±âº» º¸¾È Àü·«À¸·Î È®°íÈ÷ ÇÒ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
½Å¿ø ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ Ç¥ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È À§ÇùÀÇ Áõ°¡
·¹°Å½Ã ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿ÍÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀÇ º¹À⼺
½Å¿ø Á᫐ º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©ÀÇ Ã¤Åà Áõ°¡
Global Zero Trust Architecture Market was valued at USD 18.55 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 46.94 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 16.73% through 2030.
Market Overview | |
---|---|
Forecast Period | 2026-2030 |
Market Size 2024 | USD 18.55 Billion |
Market Size 2030 | USD 46.94 Billion |
CAGR 2025-2030 | 16.73% |
Fastest Growing Segment | BFSI |
Largest Market | North America |
Unlike traditional perimeter-based security models, Zero Trust Architecture assumes no user or device is inherently trustworthy, whether inside or outside the organization's network. Every access request is continuously authenticated, authorized, and encrypted, significantly reducing the attack surface. As organizations adopt cloud services, remote work, and bring-your-own-device environments, Zero Trust offers a scalable and adaptive framework to secure complex, hybrid infrastructures.
Rising cyber threats and data breaches are major contributors to the market's growth. With increased attacks targeting identity, endpoints, and data, organizations are shifting toward proactive security models. Regulatory mandates such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA also push enterprises to adopt tighter security frameworks like Zero Trust. Companies across verticals including financial services, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing are rapidly integrating Zero Trust principles to secure user identities, networks, applications, and data. Furthermore, digital transformation initiatives and distributed workforces have made traditional security perimeters obsolete, accelerating the need for Zero Trust adoption.
The Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is expected to see strong growth driven by innovation and increasing investment in cybersecurity. Vendors are developing integrated Zero Trust platforms that combine multi-factor authentication, micro-segmentation, identity and access management, endpoint security, and real-time analytics. Cloud-based Zero Trust solutions are gaining traction due to their scalability and ease of deployment. As enterprises look to strengthen their cybersecurity posture and reduce insider threats, the demand for Zero Trust Architecture is anticipated to grow exponentially. Continuous advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning will further support adaptive access control and real-time threat detection, solidifying Zero Trust as a foundational security strategy in the evolving digital landscape.
Key Market Drivers
Escalating Cybersecurity Threats Targeting Identities and Data
The modern threat landscape is characterized by increasingly targeted attacks-such as credential theft, lateral movement, ransomware, and supply chain exploits-that do not respect traditional network perimeters. Organizations are recognizing that perimeter-based defenses are insufficient when adversaries can bypass firewalls or exploit trusted insiders. Zero Trust architecture addresses this by enforcing continuous verification of every access request, regardless of source or destination, ensuring that identities and data remain protected even in compromised environments.
With identity-based attacks accounting for a growing share of breaches, enterprises across financial, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors are adopting Zero Trust as a core shield. Continuous authentication, micro-segmentation, and least-privilege access policies limit the blast radius of incidents and enable controlled movement within the network. As cyber risk evolves, the rigor and adaptability of Zero Trust principles are compelling organizations to shift away from legacy access models. In 2024, around 76 percent of confirmed data breaches involved misuse or theft of credentials. This alarming figure highlights the failure of perimeter-based security models and underscores the urgency for organizations to implement Zero Trust frameworks that enforce continuous identity verification and access validation at every point across their digital infrastructure.
Key Market Challenges
Complexity in Integration with Legacy Infrastructure
One of the most pressing challenges hindering the widespread adoption of Zero Trust Architecture in the global market is the complexity associated with integrating it into existing legacy infrastructure. Most organizations, especially large enterprises and public institutions, operate on decades-old networks and systems that were never designed with Zero Trust principles in mind. Retrofitting these systems requires meticulous reconfiguration of access protocols, identity management layers, network segmentation models, and endpoint visibility frameworks. This integration is not only time-consuming but also requires substantial capital investment, which becomes even more daunting for organizations dealing with outdated, unsupported, or heavily customized platforms. As a result, companies often struggle to migrate to a Zero Trust model without causing service disruptions or exposing themselves to interim vulnerabilities during the transition period.
The transition to Zero Trust Architecture demands a fundamental shift in how access and trust are managed across digital ecosystems. Unlike traditional perimeter-based models, Zero Trust assumes no implicit trust and requires continuous authentication, authorization, and validation at every access point. However, legacy systems were built on the principle of network-based trust, creating friction in aligning them with Zero Trust methodologies. Many of these systems lack support for modern authentication standards, making it difficult to establish identity-aware access control without major overhauls or custom integrations. Organizations also face skill gaps among their IT teams, who may not possess the specialized knowledge necessary to architect secure, scalable Zero Trust deployments. These factors collectively impede the pace of adoption, increase total cost of ownership, and deter organizations from fully embracing Zero Trust Architecture.
Key Market Trends
Rising Adoption of Identity-Centric Security Frameworks
A significant trend driving the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is the increasing emphasis on identity-centric security models. As organizations shift from perimeter-based defenses toward micro-segmented, identity-driven access control mechanisms, identity verification has become the foundational layer of Zero Trust implementation. Enterprises are integrating advanced identity and access management technologies to verify users, devices, and workloads before granting access to critical resources. These systems allow organizations to enforce contextual, risk-aware policies based on real-time identity attributes, location, behavior, and device posture.
This identity-centric approach is particularly valuable in hybrid and remote work environments, where the traditional corporate network boundary has dissolved. Enterprises can no longer rely on physical network segmentation alone. Instead, by prioritizing identity as the new perimeter, organizations can minimize lateral movement of threats and detect anomalous access patterns more effectively. Identity-centric frameworks also support regulatory compliance by ensuring traceability and policy enforcement across multi-cloud and distributed infrastructures. The global surge in identity breaches and credential-based attacks further underscores the importance of adopting identity-first Zero Trust strategies across public and private sectors.
In this report, the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:
Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market.
Global Zero Trust Architecture Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report: