¼¼°èÀÇ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀå
Zero Trust Architecture
»óǰÄÚµå : 1773956
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 07¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 472 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 5,850 £Ü 8,239,000
PDF (Single User License) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 17,550 £Ü 24,719,000
PDF (Global License to Company and its Fully-owned Subsidiaries) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 471¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ Àü¸Á

2024³â¿¡ 197¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³âºÎÅÍ 2030³â±îÁö CAGR 15.6%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 471¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ºÎ¹® Áß ÇϳªÀÎ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº CAGR 14.2%¸¦ ±â·ÏÇÏ¸ç ºÐ¼® ±â°£ Á¾·á½Ã¿¡´Â 294¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ¼­ºñ½º ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGR 18.3%·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀåÀº 54¾ï ´Þ·¯, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 20.5%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹Ãø

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 54¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ °æÁ¦ ´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº 2030³â±îÁö 101¾ï ´Þ·¯ÀÇ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ¸ç, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â CAGRÀº 20.5%¸¦ ±â·ÏÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖ°í, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGRÀº °¢°¢ 11.7%¿Í 13.9%·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼­´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ CAGR ¾à 12.4%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°è Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀå - ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ ¹× ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³°¡ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾ÈÀÇ »õ·Î¿î Ç¥ÁØÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¹«¾ùÀϱî? º¸¾È ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ º¯È­ ÀÌÇØ

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³(Zero Trust Architecture, ZTA)ÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀº Á¶Á÷ÀÌ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È À§ÇùÀÇ Áõ°¡, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ À¯Ãâ, °íµµÈ­µÈ ÇØÅ· ±â¼ú¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ºü¸£°Ô Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °æ°è ±â¹Ý ¹æ¾î¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â ±âÁ¸ º¸¾È ¸ðµ¨°ú ´Þ¸®, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®´Â '½Å·ÚÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í Ç×»ó °ËÁõÇÑ´Ù'´Â ¿øÄ¢¿¡ µû¶ó ¿î¿µµÇ¸ç, ¸ðµç »ç¿ëÀÚ, µð¹ÙÀ̽º, ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀÌ Áß¿äÇÑ ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ Á¢±ÙÇϱâ Àü¿¡ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁõ ¹× ½ÂÀεǴ °ÍÀ» º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ, ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹«, ÇÏÀ̺긮µå IT ȯ°æÀÇ ºÎ»óÀ¸·Î ³×Æ®¿öÅ©ÀÇ °æ°è°¡ Á¡Á¡ ´õ ¸ðÈ£ÇØÁö¸é¼­ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¸À¸·Î´Â ÃæºÐÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ·£¼¶¿þ¾î, ÇǽÌ, °ø±Þ¸Á Ä§ÇØ µî ÁÖ¸ñ¹Þ´Â »çÀ̹ö °ø°ÝÀº °ø°Ý ´ë»ó ¿µ¿ªÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í ¹«´Ü ¾×¼¼½º¸¦ ¹æÁöÇÏ´Â Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©ÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ´õ¿í °¡¼ÓÈ­½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤ºÎ ¹× ±ÔÁ¦ ±â°üµéµµ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠¿ä°ÇÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® µµÀÔÀ» Àǹ«È­Çϱ⠽ÃÀÛÇϸ鼭 Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®ÀÇ ½ÃÀå È®»êÀ» ´õ¿í ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷µéÀÌ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ °­È­, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ȯ°æ º¸¾È, ³»ºÎ À§Çù °¨¼Ò¸¦ À§ÇØ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³´Â Çö´ë ±â¾÷¿¡¼­ ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â º¸¾È Àü·«À¸·Î ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® º¸¾ÈÀ» °­È­ÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î ±â¼úÀ̶õ? ÃÖ÷´Ü Çõ½Å ±â¼ú »ìÆìº¸±â

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® º¸¾ÈÀÇ ÁøÈ­´Â ÀΰøÁö´É(AI), ¸Ó½Å·¯´×, Çൿ ºÐ¼®ÀÇ ¹ßÀü¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, AI ±â¹Ý À§Çù ŽÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº »ç¿ëÀÚÀÇ ÇൿÀ» ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇϰí Ä§ÇØ°¡ ¹ß»ýÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ÀÌ»ó ¡ÈÄ¿Í ÀáÀçÀû º¸¾È À§ÇèÀ» ½Äº°ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ´Ù´Ü°è ÀÎÁõ(MFA) ¹× »ýü ÀÎÁõÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ID ¹× ¾×¼¼½º °ü¸®(IAM) ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ±â¹Ð µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿Í ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤´çÇÑ »ç¿ëÀÚ¸¸ Á¢±ÙÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. SASE(Secure Access Service Edge) ¹× SDP(Software Defined Perimeter) ±â¼úÀº ºÐ»êµÈ ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¿Í ¿ø°Ý Àη¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ º¸¾È ÅëÇÕÀ» °¡´ÉÇϰÔÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ±¸ÇöÀ» ´õ¿í °­È­ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¾×¼¼½º(ZTNA)¿Í °áÇÕµÈ ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ® ŽÁö ¹× ´ëÀÀ(EDR) ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº º¸¾È °¡½Ã¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ã۰í, ±â¾÷Àº À§Çè Æò°¡¿¡ µû¶ó µ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¤Ã¥À» Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È À§ÇùÀÌ °è¼Ó ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¸ðµ¨Àº °íµµÀÇ ÀÚµ¿È­¿Í AI ±â¹Ý À§Çù ÀÎÅÚ¸®Àü½º¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Áö´ÉÇü °ø°ÝÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ¼±Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ¾îÇÏ°í µðÁöÅÐ ÀÚ»êÀ» Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î º¸È£ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ µµÀÔÀÇ °úÁ¦´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡? ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå À庮¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÀÀ

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ µµÀÔÀº ±× È¿°ú¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ³ôÀº µµÀÔ ºñ¿ë, ÅëÇÕÀÇ º¹À⼺, º¯È­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀúÇ× µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ¹®Á¦¸¦ ¾È°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¹Àº Á¶Á÷, ƯÈ÷ Áß¼Ò±â¾÷(SME)Àº Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®¸¦ º»°ÝÀûÀ¸·Î µµÀÔÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÀçÁ¤Àû ÅõÀÚ¿¡ ¾î·Á¿òÀ» °Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ·¹°Å½Ã ÀÎÇÁ¶óÀÇ ¾÷±×·¹À̵å, Àη ±³À°, »õ·Î¿î º¸¾È µµ±¸ÀÇ ±¸ÀÔÀ» ¼ö¹ÝÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹±â ¶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¿øÄ¢À» ±âÁ¸ IT ȯ°æ¿¡ ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº º¹ÀâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¼­ºñ½º, ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º ½Ã½ºÅÛ, ¼­µåÆÄƼ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ǰúÀÇ »óÈ£¿î¿ë¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ½ÅÁßÇÑ °èȹÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Á÷¿ø°ú IT ÆÀÀº Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ÀÎÁõ°ú Á¦ÇÑµÈ ¾×¼¼½º Á¦¾î°¡ ¿öÅ©Ç÷οìÀÇ È¿À²¼ºÀ» ÀúÇØÇÑ´Ù°í »ý°¢Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ Á¶Á÷ ³»¿¡¼­ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® µµÀÔ¿¡ °ÅºÎ°¨À» ´À³¢´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹½À´Ï´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ °úÁ¦´Â Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®¸¦ µµÀÔÇϸ鼭 ¾÷°è ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ ÁؼöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ±Øº¹Çϱâ À§ÇØ Á¶Á÷µéÀº ´Ü°èÀû Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» äÅÃÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¾ÆÀ̵§Æ¼Æ¼ º¸¾È, ¿£µåÆ÷ÀÎÆ® º¸È£, ÃÖ¼Ò ±ÇÇÑ ¾×¼¼½º °ü¸®¸¦ ÅëÇØ ´Ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ¿äÀÎÀº ¹«¾ùÀϱî? ÁÖ¿ä ¼ºÀå ¿äÀÎ ÆÄ¾Ç

Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº »çÀ̹ö À§ÇùÀÇ ºóµµ Áõ°¡, ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹« ȯ°æÀÇ È®´ë, ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö ¿ä±¸ »çÇ×ÀÇ Áõ°¡ µî ¿©·¯ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »çÀ̹ö °ø°ÝÀÌ ´õ¿í ±³¹¦ÇØÁö°í ±ÝÀüÀû ÇÇÇØ°¡ È®´ëµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ±â¾÷µéÀº º¸¾È À§ÇèÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ°í ¹Î°¨ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇØ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® µµÀÔÀ» ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ µÎ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á÷¿øµéÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±â±â¿Í Àå¼Ò¿¡¼­ ±â¾÷ ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¿¡ Á¢¼ÓÇϸ鼭 º¸¾È Ä§ÇØÀÇ À§Ç輺ÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁ³±â ¶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ »çÀ̹öº¸¾ÈÀÎÇÁ¶óº¸¾Èû(CISA)°ú À¯·´ ÀϹݰ³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£±ÔÁ¤(GDPR)À» ºñ·ÔÇÑ Á¤ºÎ ±ÔÁ¦´Â º¸´Ù ¾ö°ÝÇÑ º¸¾È Á¶Ä¡¸¦ Àǹ«È­Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±â¾÷µéÀº Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® Àü·«À» µµÀÔÇϵµ·Ï Àå·ÁÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼­ºñ½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °æ°è ±â¹Ý º¸¾È ¸ðµ¨Àº ´õ ÀÌ»ó À¯È¿ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È ±â¼úÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀü, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ®ÀÇ ÀÌÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÎ½Ä Áõ°¡, µðÁöÅÐ Çõ½Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ½ÃÀåÀº ÇâÈÄ ¸î ³â µ¿¾È Å©°Ô ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

ºÎ¹®

Á¦°ø ºÐ¾ß(Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç, Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ ¼­ºñ½º), Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ð(Áß¼Ò±â¾÷, ´ë±â¾÷), Àü°³ ºÐ¾ß(Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå Àü°³, ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º Àü°³), ¾÷Á¾(BFSI, IT & ITS, ÇコÄɾî, ¼Ò¸Å ¹× E-Commerce, ¿¡³ÊÁö ¹× À¯Æ¿¸®Æ¼, ±âŸ)

Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±â¾÷ »ç·Ê

AI ÅëÇÕ

Global Industry Analysts´Â °ËÁõµÈ Àü¹®°¡ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷¿Í AI ÅøÀ» ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀå Á¤º¸¿Í °æÀï Á¤º¸¸¦ Çõ½ÅÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Global Industry Analysts´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ LLM ¹× ¾÷°èº° SLM Äõ¸®¸¦ µû¸£´Â ´ë½Å ºñµð¿À ±â·Ï, ºí·Î±×, °Ë»ö ¿£Áø Á¶»ç, ¹æ´ëÇÑ ¾çÀÇ ±â¾÷, Á¦Ç°/¼­ºñ½º, ½ÃÀå µ¥ÀÌÅÍ µî ¼¼°è Àü¹®°¡·ÎºÎÅÍ ¼öÁýÇÑ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ¸®Æ÷ÁöÅ丮¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

°ü¼¼ ¿µÇâ °è¼ö

Global Industry Analysts´Â º»»çÀÇ ±¹°¡, Á¦Á¶°ÅÁ¡, ¼öÃâÀÔ(¿ÏÁ¦Ç° ¹× OEM)À» ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï·Â º¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¹ÀâÇÏ°í ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ¸ÅÃâ¿ø°¡(COGS) Áõ°¡, ¼öÀͼº °¨¼Ò, °ø±Þ¸Á ÀçÆí µî ¹Ì½ÃÀû ¹× °Å½ÃÀû ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ Áß¿¡¼­µµ ƯÈ÷ °æÀï»çµé¿¡°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå °æÀï

ksm
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market to Reach US$47.1 Billion by 2030

The global market for Zero Trust Architecture estimated at US$19.7 Billion in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$47.1 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 15.6% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Zero Trust Architecture Solutions, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 14.2% CAGR and reach US$29.4 Billion by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Zero Trust Architecture Services segment is estimated at 18.3% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$5.4 Billion While China is Forecast to Grow at 20.5% CAGR

The Zero Trust Architecture market in the U.S. is estimated at US$5.4 Billion in the year 2024. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$10.1 Billion by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 20.5% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 11.7% and 13.9% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 12.4% CAGR.

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market - Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

Why Is Zero Trust Architecture Becoming the New Standard in Cybersecurity? Understanding the Shift in Security Models

The adoption of Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) has rapidly increased as organizations face growing cybersecurity threats, data breaches, and sophisticated hacking techniques. Unlike traditional security models that rely on perimeter-based defenses, Zero Trust operates on the principle of "never trust, always verify," ensuring that all users, devices, and applications are continuously authenticated and authorized before accessing critical systems. The rise of cloud computing, remote work, and hybrid IT environments has rendered legacy security frameworks insufficient, as network perimeters have become increasingly blurred. High-profile cyberattacks, including ransomware, phishing, and supply chain breaches, have further accelerated the need for Zero Trust security frameworks to minimize attack surfaces and prevent unauthorized access. Governments and regulatory bodies have also started mandating Zero Trust implementation as part of cybersecurity compliance requirements, further driving market adoption. As organizations seek to enhance data protection, secure cloud environments, and mitigate insider threats, Zero Trust Architecture is emerging as the preferred security strategy for modern enterprises.

How Are Emerging Technologies Strengthening Zero Trust Security? Exploring Cutting-Edge Innovations

The evolution of Zero Trust security has been heavily influenced by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and behavioral analytics. AI-powered threat detection systems now enable real-time monitoring of user behavior, identifying anomalies and potential security risks before breaches occur. Identity and Access Management (IAM) solutions, including multi-factor authentication (MFA) and biometric verification, have become integral to Zero Trust frameworks, ensuring that only legitimate users gain access to sensitive data and systems. The adoption of Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) and Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) technologies has further enhanced Zero Trust implementation by enabling seamless security integration across distributed networks and remote workforces. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions, combined with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), have also improved security visibility, allowing organizations to dynamically enforce policies based on risk assessments. As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, Zero Trust models are leveraging advanced automation and AI-driven threat intelligence to proactively defend against sophisticated attacks, ensuring continuous protection for digital assets.

What Are the Challenges of Implementing Zero Trust Architecture? Addressing Key Market Barriers

Despite its effectiveness, implementing Zero Trust Architecture comes with several challenges, including high deployment costs, complexity in integration, and resistance to change. Many organizations, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), struggle with the financial investment required for a full-scale Zero Trust deployment, as it often involves upgrading legacy infrastructure, training personnel, and acquiring new security tools. Integrating Zero Trust principles into existing IT environments can also be complex, requiring careful planning to ensure interoperability with cloud services, on-premises systems, and third-party applications. Additionally, there is often resistance to Zero Trust adoption within organizations, as employees and IT teams may view continuous authentication and restricted access controls as disruptive to workflow efficiency. Another challenge is ensuring compliance with industry regulations while implementing Zero Trust, as different sectors have varying security requirements that must be addressed. To overcome these challenges, organizations are increasingly adopting phased approaches, focusing on incremental Zero Trust adoption through identity security, endpoint protection, and least-privilege access management.

What Is Driving the Growth of the Zero Trust Architecture Market? Identifying Key Expansion Factors

The growth in the Zero Trust Architecture market is driven by several factors, including the rising frequency of cyber threats, the expansion of remote work environments, and increasing regulatory compliance requirements. As cyberattacks become more sophisticated and financially damaging, organizations are prioritizing Zero Trust implementation to minimize security risks and protect sensitive data. The shift to hybrid and remote work models has further necessitated the adoption of Zero Trust frameworks, as employees access corporate networks from various devices and locations, increasing the risk of security breaches. Government regulations, including those from the U.S. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), are mandating stricter security measures, prompting enterprises to implement Zero Trust strategies. Additionally, the growing reliance on cloud-based services has made traditional perimeter-based security models obsolete, accelerating the demand for Zero Trust solutions. With continuous advancements in cybersecurity technology, increasing awareness of Zero Trust benefits, and rising investments in digital transformation, the Zero Trust Architecture market is poised for substantial growth in the coming years.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Zero Trust Architecture market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:

Offering (Zero Trust Architecture Solutions, Zero Trust Architecture Services); Organization Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises); Deployment (Cloud Deployment, On-Premise Deployment); Vertical (BFSI Vertical, IT & ITeS Vertical, Healthcare Vertical, Retail & Ecommerce Vertical, Energy & Utilities Vertical, Other Verticals)

Geographic Regions/Countries:

World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; Spain; Russia; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific (Australia; India; South Korea; and Rest of Asia-Pacific); Latin America (Argentina; Brazil; Mexico; and Rest of Latin America); Middle East (Iran; Israel; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; and Rest of Middle East); and Africa.

Select Competitors (Total 43 Featured) -

AI INTEGRATIONS

We're transforming market and competitive intelligence with validated expert content and AI tools.

Instead of following the general norm of querying LLMs and Industry-specific SLMs, we built repositories of content curated from domain experts worldwide including video transcripts, blogs, search engines research, and massive amounts of enterprise, product/service, and market data.

TARIFF IMPACT FACTOR

Our new release incorporates impact of tariffs on geographical markets as we predict a shift in competitiveness of companies based on HQ country, manufacturing base, exports and imports (finished goods and OEM). This intricate and multifaceted market reality will impact competitors by increasing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), reducing profitability, reconfiguring supply chains, amongst other micro and macro market dynamics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

IV. COMPETITION

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â