¼¼°èÀÇ »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀå
Ecotoxicological Studies
»óǰÄÚµå : 1791646
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 08¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 135 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 5,850 £Ü 8,242,000
PDF (Single User License) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 17,550 £Ü 24,727,000
PDF (Global License to Company and its Fully-owned Subsidiaries) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

¼¼°èÀÇ »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 15¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ Àü¸Á

2024³â¿¡ 12¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â¿¡´Â 15¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸£°í, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â CAGRÀº 3.2%¸¦ º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. º» º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ºÎ¹® Áß ÇϳªÀÎ ¼ö»ý »ýŵ¶¼º ¼­ºñ½º´Â CAGR 3.6%¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»°í, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ Á¾·á½Ã¿¡´Â 7¾ï 7,430¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ÀúÁú »ýŵ¶¼º ¼­ºñ½º ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀº ºÐ¼® ±â°£Áß CAGR 3.8%·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀåÀº 3¾ï 1,680¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 3.2%·Î ¼ºÀå ¿¹Ãø

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 3¾ï 1,680¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ °æÁ¦´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â°£ CAGR 3.2%·Î 2030³â±îÁö 2¾ï 3,610¸¸ ´Þ·¯ ±Ô¸ð¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ÁÖ¸ñÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ºÐ¼® ±â°£Áß CAGRÀº °¢°¢ 3.0%¿Í 2.8%¸¦ º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼­´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ CAGR 2.7%¸¦ º¸ÀÏ Àü¸ÁÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀå - ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ°ú ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®

ȯ°æ ¸®½ºÅ©°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ¿¬±¸°¡ ½Ã±ÞÇÑ ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¹«¾ùÀϱî?

ȯ°æ¿À¿°°ú »ýŰèÀÇ °Ç°­¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á°¡ ½É°¢ÇÑ ¼öÁØ¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÑ °¡¿îµ¥, »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ¿¬±¸´Â È­Çй°Áú°ú ¿À¿°¹°Áú, Àΰ£ Ȱµ¿ÀÌ ÀÚ¿¬ ¼­½ÄÁö¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ÇʼöÀûÀÎ °úÇÐ ºÐ¾ß·Î ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¼ö»ý ¹× À°»ó »ý¹°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹°ÁúÀÇ µ¶¼º ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡Çϰí, ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö, ȯ°æ ¸®½ºÅ© Æò°¡ ¹× Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º °èȹ¿¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°èÀÇ »ê¾÷È­, ³ó¾÷ÀÇ Áý¾àÈ­, µµ½ÃÀÇ È®Àå¿¡ µû¶ó »ýŰè´Â ³ó¾à, ÀǾàǰ, ¹Ì¼¼ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½, Á߱ݼÓ, ³»ºÐºñ ±³¶õ È­ÇÕ¹° µî º¹ÀâÇÑ ¿À¿°¹°Áú¿¡ ³ëÃâµÉ ±âȸ°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤ºÎ¿Í ±¹Á¦±â±¸°¡ ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ °­È­ÇÏ°í »õ·Î¿î ȯ°æ ¾ÈÀü ±âÁØÄ¡¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó »ê¾÷°è´Â °³¹ß ¹× ±ÔÁ¤ Áؼö ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î ¸é¹ÐÇÑ »ýÅ µ¶¼º Å×½ºÆ®¸¦ ¼öÇàÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ¿¬±¸´Â ¶ÇÇÑ È­Çй°ÁúÀÇ Àå±â ³ëÃâÀÌ »ýŰ迡 ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¹àÇô³»¾î »ý¹°´Ù¾ç¼º º¸Àü ³ë·Â¿¡ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±âÈÄ º¯È­°¡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ¹°, Åä¾ç, ´ë±â Áß ¿À¿°¹°ÁúÀÇ µ¿Å°¡ º¯È­ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ȯ°æ°ú ÀÎü °Ç°­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À§ÇùÀ» Á¶±â¿¡ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿¹Ãø »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ Ä¿Áö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, »çȸÀû °¨½Ã°¡ °­È­µÇ°í ±â¾÷ÀÇ ESG¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ±â¾÷µéÀº Á¦Ç°ÀÇ »ýÅÂÇÐÀû ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ÀÔÁõÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Àνİú Ã¥ÀÓ°¨ÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö¸é¼­ »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐÀº ´õ ÀÌ»ó ÁÖº¯ÀûÀÎ °ü½É»ç°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ, Á¦¾à°ú È­Àåǰ¿¡¼­ ³ó¾÷°ú ¿¡³ÊÁö¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ê¾÷¿¡¼­ Àü·«ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ºÐ¾ß°¡ µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

°úÇÐÀû Çõ½Å°ú Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº »ýŵ¶¼º Á¶»ç¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô °­È­Çϰí Àִ°¡?

±â¼ú°ú ±â¹ýÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀº Á¶»ç ±â¹ýÀÇ ´É·Â°ú ¹üÀ§¸¦ º¯È­½ÃÄÑ º¸´Ù Á¤È®Çϰí È¿À²ÀûÀÌ¸ç ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ýÅÂÇÐÀû ¹è°æ¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °íó¸® ½ºÅ©¸®´× ¹æ¹ý°ú ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À ºÐ¼®¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© µ¶¼º Å×½ºÆ®¸¦ °£¼ÒÈ­Çϰí, ¿¬±¸ÀÚµéÀº ´ë±Ô¸ð È­Çй°Áú ¶óÀ̺귯¸®¸¦ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°í ºñ¿ë È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î ó¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ in vitro ½Ã½ºÅÛ, ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ±â¹Ý(in silico) ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ç, Àå±â ¿ÂĨ ±â¼ú µî ´ëü ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ µîÀåÀ¸·Î ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ µ¿¹° ½ÇÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ °¨¼ÒÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ÀεµÀûÀ̰í À±¸®ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸ °üÇàÀ» Àå·ÁÇÏ´Â Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀÎ ³ë·Â°ú ÀÏÄ¡ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. À¯ÀüüÇÐ, Àü»çüÇÐ, ´ë»çüÇÐ µî ¿À¹Í½º ±â¹Ý Á¢±Ù¹ýÀº µ¶¼º¹°ÁúÀÇ Ä¡»çÀ²°ú Àå±âÀû ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÐÀÚ ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­ Àü·Ê ¾ø´Â ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇϰí, »ýÅÂÇÐÀû ½ºÆ®·¹½º ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ ³ôÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÷´Ü À̹Ì¡, »ý¹°Á¤º¸ÇÐ, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼® µµ±¸µµ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °úÇÐÀÚµéÀº µ¶¼º ¹°ÁúÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ½Ã°¢È­Çϰí, º¹ÀâÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼¼Æ®¸¦ ÇØ¼®Çϰí, »ýÅÂ°è ¼öÁØÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¸ðµ¨¸µÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ȯ°æ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀº ¿ø°Ý °¨Áö, ½Ç½Ã°£ ¼öÁú ¼¾¼­, Áö¸®Àû °ø°£ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇè½Ç¿¡¼­ ¾òÀº °á°ú¸¦ ½ÇÁ¦ ³ëÃ⠽󪸮¿À¿Í ¿¬°áÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀº °úÇÐÀÚ, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹, ±â¾÷ÀÌ ´õ ³ªÀº Á¤º¸¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇØÁÖ¸ç, »ýÅÂ°è ¼Õ»óÀ» ´Ü¼øÈ÷ ±â·ÏÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó »çÀü¿¡ ¿¹¹æÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿¹Ãø »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±ÔÁ¦ µ¿Çâ°ú ¾÷°èÀÇ ¾Ð·ÂÀº »ýŵ¶¼º Æò°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô Çü¼ºÇϰí Àִ°¡?

»ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©ÀÇ °­È­, »çȸÀû ±â´ëÄ¡ÀÇ º¯È­, ±×¸®°í ¾÷°è ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀÇ ¿ä±¸»çÇ×ÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¶ó Å©°Ô Çü¼ºµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ ȯ°æº¸È£Ã»(EPA), À¯·´È­Çй°Áúû(ECHA), OECD µî ±ÔÁ¦±â°üÀº È­Çй°Áú ¾ÈÀü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡À̵å¶óÀΰú ½ÃÇè ¿ä°ÇÀ» Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±â¾÷µéÀº Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ »ýŵ¶¼º µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. REACH(È­Çй°ÁúÀÇ µî·Ï, Æò°¡, Çã°¡ ¹× Á¦ÇÑ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü) ¹× EUÀÇ ¹° ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ© Áöħ°ú °°Àº ¹ý·üÀº ȯ°æ ³ëÃâ ¹× »ýÅÂ°è ¼öÁØÀÇ À§Çè Æò°¡¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ ÀçÇö °¡´ÉÇÑ »ýŵ¶¼º ½ÃÇèÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²² Á¦¾à, ³ó¾à, ¼ÒºñÀç µîÀÇ »ê¾÷Àº ȯ°æ Åõ¸í¼º°ú Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ ½ÇõÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Â ÅõÀÚÀÚ¿Í ¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ °¨½ÃÀÇ ´«Ãʸ®¸¦ ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¶§¹®¿¡ ±â¾÷µéÀº ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ ÃæÁ·Çϱâ À§Çؼ­»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Á¦Ç° °ü¸® ¹× ¼ö¸íÁֱ⠺м®À» Áö¿øÇϱâ À§ÇØ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î »ýŵ¶¼º Æò°¡¸¦ ÀÇ·ÚÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °øÇØ, ¼­½ÄÁö ÆÄ±«, »ý¹° ´Ù¾ç¼º ¼Õ½Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È¯°æ ¼Ò¼Û°ú ½Ã¹Î Ȱµ¿ÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁö¸é¼­ ±â¾÷µéÀº È®½ÇÇÑ »ýŵ¶¼º µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ÅëÇØ ½Ç»ç¸¦ ÀÔÁõÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â »óȲ¿¡ Ã³ÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ¿¬°è ´ëÃâ°ú ESG µî±ÞÀº ȯ°æ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ¼º°ú Æò°¡ ÁöÇ¥·Î »ï°í, ±â¾÷ Àü·«¿¡¼­ »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´õ¿í °ø°íÈ÷ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÈûµéÀÌ °áÇÕµÇ¾î »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸´Â ±ÔÁ¦ Àǹ«¿¡¼­ ¸®½ºÅ© °ü¸®, Çõ½Å, Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º º¸°í¸¦ À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ µµ±¸·Î º¯¸ðÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àü ¼¼°è »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» °¡¼ÓÇÏ´Â ¿äÀÎÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?

»ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº ±ÔÁ¦ ÁøÈ­, °úÇÐ ¹ßÀü, ȯ°æ Á¤Ã¥, ±â¾÷ Ã¥ÀÓ µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö »óÈ£ ¿¬°üµÈ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁÖµµµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. È­ÇÐ ¿À¿°, »ý¹° ´Ù¾ç¼º ¼Õ½Ç, »ýÅÂ°è ºÒ±ÕÇü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀÎ ¿ì·Á°¡ Ä¿Áö¸é¼­ »ê¾÷ ¹× ¼ÒºñÀç Á¦Ç°ÀÇ È¯°æ ¹ßÀÚ±¹À» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Ã¼°èÀûÀÎ µ¶¼º Å×½ºÆ®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °­·ÂÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ¹ß»ýÇß½À´Ï´Ù. REACH, TSCA(À¯Çع°Áú°ü¸®¹ý)¿Í °°Àº ±ÔÁ¦ Àǹ«¿Í ½ºÅåȦ¸§ Çù¾à, ¹ÙÁ© Çù¾à°ú °°Àº ±¹Á¦ Çù¾àÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Á¦Á¶¾÷üµéÀº ½ÃÁß¿¡ À¯ÅëµÇ´Â È­Çй°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¼¼ÇÑ »ýŵ¶¼º ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏÀ» ÀÛ¼ºÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. AI ±â¹Ý µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®, ¿À¹Í½º ±â¹Ý ½ºÅ©¸®´×, ¿ø°Ý °¨Áö ÅëÇÕ µîÀÇ ±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î µ¶¼º ½ÃÇèÀº ´õ¿í °ß°íÇÏ°í ¿¹Ãø °¡´ÉÇϸç È®À强ÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×¸° Äɹ̽ºÆ®¸®¿Í Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ Á¦Ç° ¼³°èÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ¸·Î ±â¾÷Àº ¿¬±¸°³¹ß °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ »ýŵ¶¼º µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î Ȱ¿ëÇϰí, óÀ½ºÎÅÍ È¯°æ ¸®½ºÅ©¸¦ ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Á¤ºÎ ¹× NGOÀÇ È¯°æ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ, »ýÅÂ°è º¹¿ø, °øÁߺ¸°Ç ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºê¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀÚ±Ý ±â¹Ý°ú Àû¿ë ¹üÀ§°¡ È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ȯ°æ ÀÎÁõ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ú ESG °ø½ÃÀÇ ºÎ»óµµ °ËÁõ °¡´ÉÇÏ°í °úÇÐÀûÀÎ ±Ù°Å¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ È¯°æ ¿µÇâ Æò°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ¼ö¿ä¸¦ âÃâÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, »ýÅÂ°è ¾ÈÀü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾ð·ÐÀÇ °ü½É Áõ°¡¿Í ¼ÒºñÀÚ ¿îµ¿Àº ¾÷°è°¡ ±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ ÇÏÇѼ±À» ³Ñ¾î ȯ°æÀû Ã¥ÀÓ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ð¹ü »ç·Ê¸¦ äÅÃÇϵµ·Ï À¯µµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀÌ °áÇÕµÇ¾î »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀº ¹ßÀüÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Çö´ë ȯ°æ °úÇÐ, Á¤Ã¥ ¹× Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ »ê¾÷ °üÇàÀÇ Ãʼ®À¸·Î ÀÚ¸® ¸Å±èÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ºÎ¹®

¼­ºñ½º(¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼ºÇÐ ¼­ºñ½º, ÀúÁú »ýÅ µ¶¼ºÇÐ ¼­ºñ½º, À°»ó »ýÅ µ¶¼ºÇÐ ¼­ºñ½º, Á¶·ù »ýÅ µ¶¼ºÇÐ ¼­ºñ½º, È­ºÐ ¸Å°³ÀÚ ½ÃÇè ¼­ºñ½º)

Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±â¾÷ ¿¹

AI ÅëÇÕ

Global Industry Analysts´Â À¯È¿ÇÑ Àü¹®°¡ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷¿Í AIÅø¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼­, ½ÃÀå Á¤º¸¿Í °æÀï Á¤º¸¸¦ º¯ÇõÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Global Industry Analysts´Â LLM³ª ¾÷°è °íÀ¯ SLM¸¦ Á¶È¸ÇÏ´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ±Ô¹ü¿¡ µû¸£´Â ´ë½Å¿¡, ºñµð¿À ±â·Ï, ºí·Î±×, °Ë»ö ¿£Áø Á¶»ç, ¹æ´ëÇÑ ¾çÀÇ ±â¾÷, Á¦Ç°/¼­ºñ½º, ½ÃÀå µ¥ÀÌÅÍ µî, Àü ¼¼°è Àü¹®°¡·ÎºÎÅÍ ¼öÁýÇÑ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ¸®Æ÷ÁöÅ丮¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

°ü¼¼ ¿µÇâ °è¼ö

Global Industry Analysts´Â º»»ç ¼ÒÀçÁö, Á¦Á¶°ÅÁ¡, ¼öÃâÀÔ(¿ÏÁ¦Ç° ¹× OEM)À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï·Â º¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¹ÀâÇÏ°í ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ¼öÀÍ¿ø°¡(COGS) Áõ°¡, ¼öÀͼº Ç϶ô, °ø±Þ¸Á ÀçÆí µî ¹Ì½ÃÀû, °Å½ÃÀû ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ Áß¿¡¼­µµ ƯÈ÷ °æÀï»çµé¿¡°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå °æÀï

LSH
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Global Ecotoxicological Studies Market to Reach US$1.5 Billion by 2030

The global market for Ecotoxicological Studies estimated at US$1.2 Billion in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$1.5 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 3.2% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Aquatic Ecotoxicology Service, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 3.6% CAGR and reach US$774.3 Million by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Sediment Ecotoxicology Service segment is estimated at 3.8% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$316.8 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 3.2% CAGR

The Ecotoxicological Studies market in the U.S. is estimated at US$316.8 Million in the year 2024. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$236.1 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 3.2% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 3.0% and 2.8% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 2.7% CAGR.

Global Ecotoxicological Studies Market - Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

Why Are Ecotoxicological Studies Gaining Urgency in the Face of Escalating Environmental Risks?

As concerns over environmental pollution and ecosystem health reach critical levels, ecotoxicological studies have emerged as an indispensable scientific discipline for assessing the impact of chemicals, pollutants, and human activity on natural habitats. These studies evaluate the toxic effects of substances on aquatic and terrestrial organisms, providing crucial data for regulatory compliance, environmental risk assessment, and sustainability planning. With the rise in global industrialization, agricultural intensification, and urban expansion, ecosystems are increasingly exposed to a complex mix of pollutants-including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, microplastics, heavy metals, and endocrine-disrupting compounds. Governments and international agencies are tightening controls and setting new environmental safety thresholds, compelling industries to conduct in-depth ecotoxicity testing as part of their development and compliance protocols. Ecotoxicological studies also support biodiversity preservation initiatives by identifying the ecological consequences of long-term chemical exposure. As climate change accelerates and alters the dynamics of pollutant behavior in water, soil, and air, the importance of predictive ecotoxicology grows, enabling early identification of threats to environmental and human health. Furthermore, increasing public scrutiny and corporate ESG commitments are pushing companies to demonstrate their products' ecological safety. In this climate of heightened awareness and accountability, ecotoxicology is no longer a peripheral concern but a strategic necessity for industries ranging from pharmaceuticals and cosmetics to agriculture and energy.

How Are Scientific Innovations and Methodological Advances Enhancing Ecotoxicity Research?

Rapid advancements in technology and methodology are transforming the capabilities and scope of ecotoxicological studies, making them more accurate, efficient, and applicable across diverse ecological contexts. The use of high-throughput screening methods and automated bioassays is streamlining toxicity testing, allowing researchers to process large chemical libraries quickly and cost-effectively. At the same time, the rise of alternative models-including in vitro systems, computer-based (in silico) simulations, and organ-on-a-chip technologies-is reducing dependence on traditional animal testing, aligning with global efforts to promote humane, ethical research practices. Omics-based approaches, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, are offering unprecedented insights into the sub-lethal and long-term effects of toxicants at the molecular level, facilitating a deeper understanding of ecological stress responses. Advanced imaging, bioinformatics, and data analytics tools are also playing a growing role, allowing scientists to visualize toxicant distribution, interpret complex datasets, and model ecosystem-level impacts more precisely. Moreover, environmental monitoring platforms now incorporate remote sensing, real-time water quality sensors, and geospatial analysis, helping link laboratory findings with real-world exposure scenarios. These innovations are empowering scientists, regulators, and businesses to make better-informed decisions, accelerating the transition toward predictive ecotoxicology that can preempt ecological damage rather than merely document it.

How Are Regulatory Trends and Industry Pressures Shaping the Demand for Ecotoxicological Assessments?

The demand for ecotoxicological studies is being significantly shaped by tightening regulatory frameworks, shifting public expectations, and the evolving needs of industry stakeholders. Regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), and the OECD are continuously updating guidelines and testing requirements for chemical safety, compelling companies to invest in comprehensive ecotoxicity data. Legislation like REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) and the Water Framework Directive in the EU are placing particular emphasis on environmental exposure and ecosystem-level risk assessment, fueling the need for standardized, reproducible ecotoxicological testing. In parallel, industries such as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and consumer goods are facing growing scrutiny from investors and consumers demanding environmental transparency and sustainable practices. This is driving companies to proactively commission ecotoxicity assessments not only to meet compliance but also to support product stewardship and life cycle analysis. The increasing frequency of environmental litigation and public activism related to pollution, habitat degradation, and biodiversity loss is also compelling businesses to demonstrate due diligence through robust ecotoxicological data. Moreover, sustainability-linked financing and ESG ratings are elevating environmental safety as a performance metric, further cementing the role of ecotoxicology in corporate strategy. Together, these forces are transforming ecotoxicological studies from a regulatory obligation into a critical tool for risk management, innovation, and sustainability reporting.

What Factors Are Driving the Growth of the Ecotoxicological Studies Market Globally?

The growth in the ecotoxicological studies market is driven by several interconnected factors that span regulatory evolution, scientific advancement, environmental policy, and corporate accountability. Increasing global concern over chemical pollution, biodiversity loss, and ecological imbalances has created a strong demand for systematic toxicity testing to assess the environmental footprint of industrial and consumer products. Regulatory mandates such as REACH, TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act), and global conventions like the Stockholm and Basel agreements are compelling manufacturers to produce detailed ecotoxicity profiles for chemicals entering the market. Technological progress-including AI-enabled data analysis, omics-based screening, and remote sensing integration-is making toxicity testing more robust, predictive, and scalable. The growth of green chemistry and sustainable product design is encouraging companies to use ecotoxicity data proactively in R&D processes to minimize environmental risks from the outset. Additionally, increased investment in environmental monitoring, ecosystem restoration, and public health initiatives by governments and NGOs is expanding the funding base and application scope for ecotoxicological research. The rise of environmental certification programs and ESG disclosures is also creating new demand for verifiable, science-based environmental impact assessments. Finally, heightened media attention and consumer activism around ecological safety are pushing industries to exceed regulatory minimums and adopt best practices in environmental responsibility. Collectively, these drivers are propelling the ecotoxicological studies market forward, establishing it as a cornerstone of modern environmental science, policy, and sustainable industry practices.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Ecotoxicological Studies market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:

Service (Aquatic Ecotoxicology Service, Sediment Ecotoxicology Service, Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Service, Avian Ecotoxicology Service, Pollinator Testing Service)

Geographic Regions/Countries:

World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific; Rest of World.

Select Competitors (Total 42 Featured) -

AI INTEGRATIONS

We're transforming market and competitive intelligence with validated expert content and AI tools.

Instead of following the general norm of querying LLMs and Industry-specific SLMs, we built repositories of content curated from domain experts worldwide including video transcripts, blogs, search engines research, and massive amounts of enterprise, product/service, and market data.

TARIFF IMPACT FACTOR

Our new release incorporates impact of tariffs on geographical markets as we predict a shift in competitiveness of companies based on HQ country, manufacturing base, exports and imports (finished goods and OEM). This intricate and multifaceted market reality will impact competitors by increasing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), reducing profitability, reconfiguring supply chains, amongst other micro and macro market dynamics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

IV. COMPETITION

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â