¼¼°èÀÇ ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀå
Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies
»óǰÄÚµå : 1785728
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 08¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 186 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 5,850 £Ü 8,209,000
PDF (Single User License) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 17,550 £Ü 24,629,000
PDF (Global License to Company and its Fully-owned Subsidiaries) help
PDF º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â °¡´ÉÇϸç Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§´Â PDF ÀÌ¿ë ¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

¼¼°èÀÇ ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 7¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ Àü¸Á

2024³â¿¡ 5¾ï 5,550¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2024-2030³â°£ CAGR 5.8%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 7¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. º» º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ºÎ¹® Áß ÇϳªÀÎ ±Þ¼º µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸´Â CAGR 4.8%¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»°í, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ Á¾·á½Ã¿¡´Â 3¾ï 2,680¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ¸¸¼º µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀº ºÐ¼® ±â°£Áß CAGR 6.4%·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀåÀº 1¾ï 4,600¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 5.8%·Î ¼ºÀå ¿¹Ãø

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 1¾ï 4,600¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ °æÁ¦´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â°£ CAGR 5.8%·Î 2030³â±îÁö 1¾ï 2,610¸¸ ´Þ·¯ ±Ô¸ð¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ÁÖ¸ñÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ºÐ¼® ±â°£Áß CAGRÀº °¢°¢ 5.3%¿Í 5.0%¸¦ º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼­´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ CAGR 4.8%¸¦ º¸ÀÏ Àü¸ÁÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀå - ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ°ú ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®

¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ÀÌ È¯°æ º¸È£¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?

¼ö»ýÅ µ¶¼º½ÃÇèÀº ¿À¿°¹°Áú, È­Çй°Áú, Àΰ£ Ȱµ¿ÀÌ ¼ö»ýŰ迡 ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â »ê¾÷Æó±â¹°, ÀǾàǰ, ³ó¾à, Áß±Ý¼Ó µîÀÇ ¹°ÁúÀÌ ¹Ì»ý¹°°ú ¹«Ã´Ãßµ¿¹°¿¡¼­ ¾î·ù¿Í ¾ç¼­·ù¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼ö»ý»ý¹°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â µ¶¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. »ê¾÷È­, µµ½ÃÈ­, ³ó¾÷ À¯Ãâ·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿À¿° ¼öÁØÀÌ °è¼Ó Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼öÁú°ú ¼ö»ý »ý¹° ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀ» º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇØ ±ÔÁ¦ ±â°üÀº ¾ö°ÝÇÑ »ýÅ µ¶¼º Æò°¡¸¦ Àǹ«È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¶·ù ´ë¹ß»ý, ¹Ì¼¼ ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½ ¿À¿°, ±â¸§ À¯Ãâ µîÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ´ã¼ö ¹× ÇØ¾ç ȯ°æÀÇ È­ÇÐ ¿À¿° ¹°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ°ú À§Çè Æò°¡ÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´õ¿í °­Á¶µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¾ç½Ä¾÷ÀÇ È®´ë¿Í ¼ö»ý »ý¹°¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ³»ºÐºñ ±³¶õ È­ÇÕ¹°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÌ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Á¶»ç´Â ´õ¿í Àü¹®È­µÇ°í µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹ÝÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤ºÎ ±â°ü, ȯ°æ ´Üü ¹× ¹Î°£ »ê¾÷°è´Â ȯ°æ ¾ÈÀü ±ÔÁ¤ Áؼö¸¦ º¸ÀåÇÏ°í »ê¾÷ ¹× ³ó¾÷ ºÎ¹®¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ °üÇàÀ» °³¹ßÇϱâ À§ÇØ Ã·´Ü »ýÅ µ¶¼º Å×½ºÆ® ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀº ¾î¶»°Ô ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º Æò°¡¸¦ °­È­Çϰí Àִ°¡?

¼ö»ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­´Â µ¶¼ºÆò°¡ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º, È¿À²¼º, ¹üÀ§¸¦ Çâ»ó½ÃŰ´Â ±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀÌ µÎµå·¯Áö°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÏÀ̽º·çDz ½ºÅ©¸®´×(HTS) ¹æ¹ýÀº È­Çй°ÁúÀÌ ¼ö»ý »ý¹°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°í ´ë±Ô¸ð·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸¿¡ Çõ¸íÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Â÷¼¼´ë ¿°±â¼­¿­ ºÐ¼®(NGS)°ú ºÐÀÚ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ±â¼úÀº À¯Çع°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö»ý»ý¹°ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀû, »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´õ ±íÀº ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ÀΰøÁö´É(AI)°ú ¸Ó½Å·¯´×(ML)ÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀº ¿¹Ãø ¸ðµ¨¸µÀ» ´õ¿í °­È­ÇÏ¿© °úÇÐÀÚµéÀÌ ºòµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ ¿À¿°¹°ÁúÀÇ Àå±âÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇØÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì¼¼ À¯Ã¼ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ¼ö»ý »ý¹°°è¸¦ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÇÏ´Â Àå±â ¿ÂĨ ±â¼úÀÇ °³¹ßÀº µ¶¼º ¿¹ÃøÀÇ ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃŰ´Â µ¿½Ã¿¡ ±âÁ¸ µ¿¹° ½ÇÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ¸¦ ³·Ãâ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »õ·Î¿î °¡´É¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¿ø°Ý °¨Áö ¹× À§¼º ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ¿À¿° ¼öÁØÀ» ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ÃßÀûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾î ¿øÀ¯ À¯Ãâ, È­Çй°Áú ´©Ãâ°ú °°Àº ȯ°æ À§Çè¿¡ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ±ÔÁ¦ ±â°üÀÌ º¸´Ù Á¤±³Çϰí À±¸®ÀûÀÎ ½ÃÇè ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ã·´Ü ±â¼úÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀº Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀ» º¸´Ù Á¤¹ÐÇϰí Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ºÐ¾ß·Î º¯È­½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾î¶² ½ÃÀå µ¿ÇâÀÌ ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ¼ö¿ä¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í Àִ°¡?

¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä´Â ±ÔÁ¦ Á¤Ã¥, »ê¾÷ÀÇ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ¸ñÇ¥, ȯ°æ À§»ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä Áõ°¡ µî ¸î °¡Áö Áß¿äÇÑ Æ®·»µå¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Çü¼ºµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è °¢±¹ Á¤ºÎ´Â ȯ°æº¸È£¹ýÀ» °­È­Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, »ê¾÷°è´Â È­Çй°ÁúÀ» ¼ö¿ª¿¡ ¹èÃâÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ »ýŵ¶¼º Æò°¡¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÒ °ÍÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¬ÇÕ(EU)ÀÇ REACH ±ÔÁ¦, ¹Ì±¹ ȯ°æº¸È£Ã»(EPA)ÀÇ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎ, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ À¯»çÇÑ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â ´õ¿í ¾ö°ÝÇÑ Å×½ºÆ® ¿ä°ÇÀ» °­Á¦Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÷´Ü µ¶¼º ½ºÅ©¸®´× ±â¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ Áõ°¡½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ °³¹ßÀÌ ÃßÁøµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¦¾à, È­Àåǰ, ³ó¾÷ µîÀÇ ¾÷°è´Â Á¦Ç°ÀÇ È¯°æ ¹ßÀÚ±¹À» Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ¼ö»ý µ¶¼º Å×½ºÆ®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ´Ã¸®°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×¸° Äɹ̽ºÆ®¸®ÀÇ ºÎ»ó°ú À¯ÇØ È­Çй°ÁúÀ» ´ëüÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »ýºÐÇØ¼º ¹°ÁúÀÇ °³¹ßÀº ½ÅÁ¦Ç°ÀÌ È¯°æ ¾ÈÀü ±âÁØÀ» ÃæÁ·ÇÏ´ÂÁö È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇØ »ýŵ¶¼º °ËÁõÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ´õ¿í ³ôÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ¼öÁú ¿À¿°°ú ÀÎü¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ±â¾÷µéÀº Åõ¸í¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̰í ȯ°æ ģȭÀûÀÎ °üÇàÀ» äÅÃÇϵµ·Ï ¾Ð·ÂÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, »ê¾÷°è, Çаè, ±ÔÁ¦±â°ü °£ÀÇ Çù·ÂÀÌ È®´ëµÇ¾î »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ°í º¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀ̰í ȯ°æ ģȭÀûÀÎ ½ÃÇè ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ °³¹ßÀÌ ÃËÁøµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¼ºÀå ¿äÀÎÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?

¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº ºÐ¼® ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀü, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ÀÇ °¨½Ã °­È­, ȯ°æÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ Á¦Ç°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡ µî ¿©·¯ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. AI¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ¿¹Ãø µ¶¼ºÇÐ ¹× °è»ê ¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ È®´ë·Î º¸´Ù ½Å¼ÓÇϰí Á¤È®ÇÑ ¸®½ºÅ© Æò°¡°¡ °¡´ÉÇØÁ® ±âÁ¸ µ¶¼º½ÃÇè¿¡ ¼Ò¿äµÇ´Â ½Ã°£°ú ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ½ÃÇè È¿À²À» ³ôÀ̸鼭 À±¸®Àû °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀ» ÁؼöÇÏ·Á´Â Á¶Á÷¿¡¼­ in-vitro ½ÃÇè¹ý ¹× ´ëü ½ÃÇè¹ý äÅÃÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °Íµµ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ȯ°æ »ý¸í°øÇÐÀÇ ºÎ»óÀº ¹Ì»ý¹°ÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Ä¡·á ¿¬±¸¸¦ °­È­ÇÏ¿© ¼öÁú ¿À¿°À» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ¸·Î À̾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ÅÈï±¹ÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ »ê¾÷È­´Â °¢±¹ Á¤ºÎ°¡ ¼öÁú ¿À¿°À» ¸·±â À§ÇØ ´õ¿í ¾ö°ÝÇÑ È¯°æ Á¤Ã¥À» ½ÃÇàÇϰí ÀÖ¾î ½ÃÀå È®´ë¿¡ ´õ¿í ±â¿©Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¦¾à ¹× ³ó¾÷ ºÎ¹®µµ ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö¸¦ º¸ÀåÇϰí Á¦Ç°ÀÇ »ýÅÂ°è ¿µÇâÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇØ »ýŵ¶¼º ¿¬±¸¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ±â¾÷ÀÇ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ESG(ȯ°æ, »çȸ, Áö¹è±¸Á¶) ±âÁØÀÇ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀÌ Ä¿Áö¸é¼­ ±â¾÷µéÀÌ Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º Àü·«¿¡¼­ »ýŵ¶¼ºÇÐÀ» ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ µÎ´Â ¿øµ¿·ÂÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »ê¾÷°è¿Í ±ÔÁ¦±â°üÀÌ ¼öÁú º¸È£¿Í »ý¹°´Ù¾ç¼º º¸ÀüÀ» Áß½ÃÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ±â¼ú Çõ½Å°ú Á¤Ã¥ °³¹ß, ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ º¯È­¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ¼ö»ý »ýÅ µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸ ¼ö¿ä´Â ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ºÎ¹®

À¯Çü(±Þ¼º µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸, ¸¸¼º µ¶¼º ¿¬±¸, »ý¹° ÃàÀû¼º ½ÃÇè, »ýºÐÇØ¼º ½ÃÇè, ±âŸ À¯Çü);ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ(ÀǾàǰ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, »ì»ý¹°Á¦ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, ³ó¾à ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, È­ÇÐÁ¦Ç° ¹× ¼®À¯È­ÇÐÁ¦Ç° ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, ±âŸ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ)

Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±â¾÷ ¿¹

AI ÅëÇÕ

Global Industry Analysts´Â À¯È¿ÇÑ Àü¹®°¡ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷¿Í AIÅø¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ÃÀå Á¤º¸¿Í °æÀï Á¤º¸¸¦ º¯ÇõÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Global Industry Analysts´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ LLM³ª ¾÷°èº° SLM Äõ¸®¿¡ µû¸£´Â ´ë½Å¿¡, ºñµð¿À ±â·Ï, ºí·Î±×, °Ë»ö ¿£Áø Á¶»ç, ´ë·® ±â¾÷, Á¦Ç°/¼­ºñ½º, ½ÃÀå µ¥ÀÌÅÍ µî, Àü ¼¼°è Àü¹®°¡·ÎºÎÅÍ ¼öÁýÇÑ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ¸®Æ÷ÁöÅ丮¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

°ü¼¼ ¿µÇâ °è¼ö

Global Industry Analysts´Â º»»ç ¼ÒÀçÁö, Á¦Á¶°ÅÁ¡, ¼öÃâÀÔ(¿ÏÁ¦Ç° ¹× OEM)À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï·Â º¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¹ÀâÇÏ°í ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ¼öÀÍ¿ø°¡(COGS) Áõ°¡, ¼öÀͼº Ç϶ô, °ø±Þ¸Á ÀçÆí µî ¹Ì½ÃÀû, °Å½ÃÀû ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ Áß¿¡¼­µµ ƯÈ÷ °æÀï»çµé¿¡°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå °æÀï

LSH
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Global Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies Market to Reach US$780.0 Million by 2030

The global market for Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies estimated at US$555.5 Million in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$780.0 Million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.8% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Acute Toxicity Tests, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 4.8% CAGR and reach US$326.8 Million by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Chronic Toxicity Tests segment is estimated at 6.4% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$146.0 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 5.8% CAGR

The Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies market in the U.S. is estimated at US$146.0 Million in the year 2024. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$126.1 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 5.8% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 5.3% and 5.0% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 4.8% CAGR.

Global Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies Market - Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

Why Are Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies Crucial for Environmental Protection?

Aquatic ecotoxicological studies play a pivotal role in understanding the impact of pollutants, chemicals, and human activities on aquatic ecosystems. These studies assess the toxicity of substances such as industrial waste, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and heavy metals on various aquatic organisms, ranging from microorganisms and invertebrates to fish and amphibians. As pollution levels continue to rise due to industrialization, urbanization, and agricultural runoff, regulatory bodies are mandating rigorous ecotoxicological assessments to safeguard water quality and aquatic biodiversity. The increasing frequency of algal blooms, microplastic contamination, and oil spills has further emphasized the need for continuous monitoring and risk assessment of chemical pollutants in freshwater and marine environments. Additionally, with the expansion of aquaculture and the growing concerns over endocrine-disrupting compounds affecting aquatic species, research in this field is becoming more specialized and data-driven. Government agencies, environmental organizations, and private industries are investing in advanced ecotoxicological testing methods to ensure compliance with environmental safety regulations and develop more sustainable practices in industrial and agricultural sectors.

How Are Technological Advancements Enhancing Aquatic Ecotoxicological Assessments?

The field of aquatic ecotoxicology has witnessed significant technological advancements that are improving the accuracy, efficiency, and scope of toxicity assessments. High-throughput screening (HTS) methods are revolutionizing ecotoxicological testing by enabling rapid and large-scale analysis of chemical effects on aquatic organisms. Additionally, next-generation sequencing (NGS) and molecular biomonitoring techniques are providing deeper insights into the genetic and biochemical responses of aquatic life to toxic substances. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ecotoxicological research is further enhancing predictive modeling, allowing scientists to assess the long-term impact of pollutants using big data analytics. The development of organ-on-a-chip technology, which simulates aquatic biological systems in microfluidic environments, is offering new possibilities for reducing reliance on traditional animal testing while improving the reliability of toxicity predictions. Furthermore, advances in remote sensing and satellite monitoring are enabling real-time tracking of pollution levels, facilitating quicker responses to environmental hazards such as oil spills and chemical leaks. As regulatory agencies push for more sophisticated and ethical testing methodologies, the adoption of these cutting-edge technologies is transforming aquatic ecotoxicological studies into a more precise and comprehensive discipline.

What Market Trends Are Influencing the Demand for Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies?

Several key trends are shaping the demand for aquatic ecotoxicological studies, driven by regulatory policies, industrial sustainability goals, and increasing consumer awareness of environmental health. Governments worldwide are tightening environmental protection laws, requiring industries to conduct extensive ecotoxicological assessments before releasing chemicals into water bodies. The European Union’s REACH regulation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines, and similar frameworks in Asia-Pacific are enforcing stricter testing requirements, boosting demand for advanced toxicity screening technologies. Additionally, the global push for sustainable development has led industries, including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and agriculture, to evaluate the environmental footprint of their products, leading to increased investment in aquatic toxicity studies. The rise of green chemistry and the development of biodegradable alternatives to harmful chemicals have further fueled the need for ecotoxicological validation, ensuring that new products meet environmental safety standards. Meanwhile, growing consumer concern over water pollution and its impact on human health has increased pressure on corporations to enhance transparency and adopt environmentally friendly practices. As a result, collaboration between industries, academic institutions, and regulatory bodies is expanding, fostering innovation in ecotoxicology and driving the development of more efficient and eco-conscious testing solutions.

What Are the Key Growth Drivers Fueling the Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies Market?

The growth in the aquatic ecotoxicological studies market is driven by several factors, including advancements in analytical technologies, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and rising demand for environmentally sustainable products. The expansion of AI-driven predictive toxicology and computational modeling is enabling faster and more accurate risk assessments, reducing the time and cost associated with traditional toxicity studies. The increasing adoption of in-vitro and alternative testing methods is also accelerating market growth, as organizations seek to comply with ethical guidelines while improving test efficiency. Additionally, the rise of environmental biotechnology is enhancing the study of microbial bioremediation, leading to innovative solutions for mitigating aquatic pollution. The rapid industrialization of emerging economies is further contributing to market expansion, as governments implement stricter environmental policies to combat water contamination. The pharmaceutical and agricultural sectors are also investing heavily in ecotoxicological research to ensure regulatory compliance and minimize the ecological impact of their products. Moreover, the growing influence of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria in corporate decision-making is driving businesses to prioritize ecotoxicology in sustainability strategies. As industries and regulatory bodies continue to emphasize water quality protection and biodiversity conservation, the demand for aquatic ecotoxicological studies is expected to experience steady growth, fueled by technological innovation, policy developments, and shifting market dynamics.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Aquatic Ecotoxicological Studies market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:

Type (Acute Toxicity Tests, Chronic Toxicity Tests, Bioaccumulation Studies, Biodegradation Studies, Other Types); End-Use (Pharmaceutical End-Use, Biocides End-Use, Agrochemicals End-Use, Chemicals & Petrochemicals End-Use, Other End-Uses)

Geographic Regions/Countries:

World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific; Rest of World.

Select Competitors (Total 39 Featured) -

AI INTEGRATIONS

We're transforming market and competitive intelligence with validated expert content and AI tools.

Instead of following the general norm of querying LLMs and Industry-specific SLMs, we built repositories of content curated from domain experts worldwide including video transcripts, blogs, search engines research, and massive amounts of enterprise, product/service, and market data.

TARIFF IMPACT FACTOR

Our new release incorporates impact of tariffs on geographical markets as we predict a shift in competitiveness of companies based on HQ country, manufacturing base, exports and imports (finished goods and OEM). This intricate and multifaceted market reality will impact competitors by increasing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), reducing profitability, reconfiguring supply chains, amongst other micro and macro market dynamics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

IV. COMPETITION

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â