µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå : Áö¿ªº°(ºÏ¹Ì, À¯·´, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç, ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«) - ¼¼°è »ê¾÷ ºÐ¼®, ±Ô¸ð, Á¡À¯À², ¼ºÀå, µ¿Çâ, ¿¹Ãø(2024-2031³â)
Docker Monitoring Market by Geography (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa): Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast, 2024-2031
»óǰÄÚµå
:
1470680
¸®¼Ä¡»ç
:
Persistence Market Research
¹ßÇàÀÏ
:
2024³â 04¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸
:
¿µ¹® 333 Pages
¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
¤± Add-on °¡´É: °í°´ÀÇ ¿äû¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ ¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡¼ CustomizationÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ »çÇ×Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï¿¡ Ãß°¡
Persistence Market ResearchÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå º¸°í¼´Â ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ, ¼ºÀå ¿äÀÎ, °úÁ¦, ½ÅÈï µ¿Çâ µîÀ» ÀÚ¼¼È÷ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© 2024³âºÎÅÍ 2031³â±îÁö ½ÃÀå ±ËÀû¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿Í Åë°è¸¦ ´Ù·ç°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌÇØ °ü°èÀÚ°¡ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÇöȲ°ú ÇâÈÄ Àü¸ÁÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¼¼°è µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â 7¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡¼ 2032³â 28¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î ¿¬Æò±Õ 17.8% ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.
ÁÖ¿ä ÀλçÀÌÆ®
ÃßÁ¤ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(2024³â) : 7¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹»ó ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(2032³â) : 28¾ï ´Þ·¯
¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå·ü(2024-2032³â CAGR) : 17.8%
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå - º¸°í¼ ¹üÀ§:
±â¾÷ IT¿¡¼ µµÄ¿¿Í ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊȰ¡ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÏ°Ô µµÀÔµÇ¸é¼ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇßÀ¸¸ç, µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ÅøÀ» ÅëÇØ ±â¾÷Àº ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈµÈ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀÇ ¼º´É, º¸¾È, ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ ÃßÀûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÃßÀûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀº ¹®Á¦¸¦ ½Äº°Çϰí, ¸®¼Ò½º¸¦ ÃÖÀûÈÇϸç, ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î¼ºñ½º ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ÀÇ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ ¿î¿µÀ» º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â µ¥ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀÇ ±Þ°ÝÇÑ ¼ºÀå, ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î¼ºñ½º »ç¿ë Áõ°¡, ÃֽŠIT ȯ°æ¿¡¼ È®À强°ú À¯¿¬¼º °ÈÀÇ Çʿ伺 µî µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¸¦ µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇØ ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ:
½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀº ¸î °¡Áö ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁÖµµµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ù°, µ¥ºê¿É½º(DevOps) °üÇà°ú Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ µµÀÔÀ¸·Î ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈµÈ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀÌ ±ÞÁõÇÏ¸é¼ °í±Þ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú°í, µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ µµ±¸´Â ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈµÈ È¯°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡½Ã¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿© Á¶Á÷ÀÌ ³ôÀº ¼º´É ¹× ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ º¸ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï µ½½À´Ï´Ù. ³ôÀº ¼º´É°ú ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺸¦ º¸ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï µµ¿ÍÁÝ´Ï´Ù. µÑ°, ±â¾÷µéÀº ÀÚµ¿È¿Í È®À强À» Áß½ÃÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´ë±Ô¸ð ¹èÆ÷¸¦ È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ µµ±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ´õ¿í Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠¿ä°Ç°ú º¸¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á·Î ÀÎÇØ ±â¾÷µéÀº ±ÔÁ¦ Ç¥ÁØÀ» ÃæÁ·ÇÏ°í ¹Î°¨ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇØ °·ÂÇÑ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» µµÀÔÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
½ÃÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ:
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀº ¼ºÀå ÀáÀç·Â¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¸î °¡Áö µµÀü °úÁ¦¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü¹® Áö½ÄÀÌ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ Á¶Á÷¿¡°Ô´Â ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈ È¯°æ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ º¹À⼺ÀÌ Å« ºÎ´ãÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ç¥ÁØÈµÈ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¾ø±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Àϰü¼º ¾ø´Â °á°ú¸¦ ÃÊ·¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ È¿À²ÀûÀÎ µµÀÔÀ» ¹æÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, À߸øµÈ ¼³Á¤À̳ª ¿À·¡µÈ ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ® µî µµÄ¿ ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÀÇ º¸¾È Ãë¾àÁ¡Àº ½É°¢ÇÑ À§ÇèÀÌ µÉ ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ Ç×»ó °æ°è¸¦ ´ÊÃßÁö ¾Ê°í È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ µµ±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
½ÃÀå ±âȸ:
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå¿¡´Â Çõ½Å°ú È®ÀåÀÇ Å« ±âȸ°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¹× ¸ÖƼ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ȯ°æÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç Á¦°ø¾÷ü¿¡°Ô ´Ù¾çÇÑ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ÅøÀ» °³¹ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ µµ±¸¿¡ ÀΰøÁö´É(AI)°ú ¸Ó½Å·¯´×(ML)À» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¸é ¿¹Ãø ºÐ¼®ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇØÁ® »çÀü ¿¹¹æÀû ¹®Á¦ ÇØ°áÀÌ °¡´ÉÇØÁý´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¼ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷ü ¹× DevOps ÅøÃ¼ÀΰúÀÇ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» ÅëÇØ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ¹üÀ§¸¦ È®ÀåÇÏ°í ´õ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
º¸°í¼¿¡¼ ´Ù·ç´Â ÁÖ¿ä Áú¹®
2024³âºÎÅÍ 2031³â±îÁö µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¿¹»ó CAGRÀº?
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀÎÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼ °¡Àå Å« ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²À» Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â Áö¿ªÀº?
¼¼°è µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Ç÷¹À̾î´Â ´©±¸Àΰ¡?
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼ °æÀï ¿ìÀ§¸¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷µéÀÌ Ã¤ÅÃÇϰí ÀÖ´Â Àü·«Àº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
°æÀï ȯ°æ ¹× »ç¾÷ Àü·«:
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷À¸·Î´Â Dynatrace, Datadog, Splunk, New Relic, Sysdig µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌµé ±â¾÷Àº ½ÃÀå¿¡¼ °æÀï·ÂÀ» À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ Çõ½Å°ú ÅëÇÕ¿¡ ÁýÁßÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, Dynatrace´Â AI¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ±â´ÉÀ¸·Î À¯¸íÇϸç, Datadog´Â ¸ÖƼ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ƯȵǾî ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °¢ ¾÷üµéÀº Á¦Ç° Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À È®´ë, Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê ±¸Ãà, R&D ÅõÀÚ µîÀÇ Àü·«À» ÅëÇØ ¼ºÀåÀ» µµ¸ðÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °æÀï ȯ°æÀÇ Æ¯Â¡Àº »ç¿ëÀÚ °æÇè Çâ»ó, °·ÂÇÑ º¸¾È ±â´É Á¦°ø, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±Ô¸ðÀÇ ±â¾÷À» À§ÇÑ È®À强 ³ôÀº ¼Ö·ç¼Ç Á¦°ø¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß°í ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
Á¦1Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à
Á¦2Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä
Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå À§Çè°ú µ¿Çâ Æò°¡
¸®½ºÅ© Æò°¡
COVID-19 À§±â¿Í µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâ
°ú°Å À§±â¿Í ºñ±³ÇÑ COVID-19ÀÇ ¿µÇâ º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©
½ÃÀå ±Ý¾×¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâ
ÁÖ¿ä ±¹°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Æò°¡
ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå ºÎ¹®º° Æò°¡
°ø±Þ¾÷ü¿¡ÀÇ Çൿ ¹æÄ§°ú Ãßõ»çÇ×
½ÃÀå¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ
󹿰ú Á¦Ç° °³¹ß µ¿Çâ
Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå ¹è°æ
ÁÖ¿ä ±¹°¡º° µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå
µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ±âȸ Æò°¡(±Ý¾×)
½ÃÀå ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ¿¹Ãø
ÅõÀÚ ½ÇÇö °¡´É¼º ºÐ¼®
¿¹Ãø¿äÀÎ - °ü·Ã¼º°ú ¿µÇâ
½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
Á¦5Àå ¼º°ø ¿¼è°¡ µÇ´Â ¿ä¼Ò
Á¦Á¶¾÷ü´Â ħÅõÀ²ÀÌ ³·Áö¸¸ ¼ºÀå·ü ³ôÀº ½ÃÀå¿¡ ÁÖ·Â
ºÎ¹® ³ôÀº ÁõºÐ ±âȸ¿¡ º£ÆÃ
ÇÇ¾î º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©
Á¦6Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ¼ö¿ä ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®, 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø, 2024-2031³â
Àü³âºñ ¼ºÀå µ¿Ç⠺м®
Á¦7Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®(±Ý¾×)
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®(±Ý¾×), 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø(±Ý¾×), 2024-2031³â
Àü³âºñ ¼ºÀå µ¿Ç⠺м®
Àý´ëÀû ¸ÅÃâ ±âȸ ºÐ¼®
Á¦8Àå ¼¼°è µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°
¼Ò°³/ÁÖ¿ä Á¶»ç °á°ú
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®, 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, 2024-2031³â
Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº° ½ÃÀå ¸Å·Âµµ ºÐ¼®
Á¦9Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, ¾÷°èº°
¼Ò°³/ÁÖ¿ä Á¶»ç °á°ú
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®, 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, 2024-2031³â
Á¤º¸±â¼ú(IT)°ú Åë½Å
ÀºÇà, ±ÝÀ¶ ¼ºñ½º, º¸Çè(BFSI)
E-Commerce¿Í ¼Ò¸Å
¹Ìµð¾î¿Í ¿£ÅÍÅ×ÀÎ¸ÕÆ®
¿©Çà°ú È£½ºÇÇÅ»¸®Æ¼
ÇコÄɾî¿Í »ý¸í°úÇÐ
±âŸ
¾÷°èº° ½ÃÀå ¸Å·Âµµ ºÐ¼®
Á¦10Àå ¼¼°è µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, Àü°³ ¹æ½Äº°
¼Ò°³/ÁÖ¿ä Á¶»ç °á°ú
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®, 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, 2024-2031³â
Àü°³ ¹æ½Äº° ½ÃÀå ¸Å·Â ºÐ¼®
Á¦11Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°
¼Ò°³/ÁÖ¿ä Á¶»ç °á°ú
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®, 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ¹× ÇâÈÄ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, 2024-2031³â
¼Ö·ç¼Ç
¼ºñ½º
ÅëÇÕ ¹× ±¸Çö ¼ºñ½º
ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ ¼ºñ½º
Æ®·¹ÀÌ´× ¹× ¼Æ÷Æ® ¼ºñ½º
ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º° ½ÃÀå ¸Å·Âµµ ºÐ¼®
Á¦12Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, Áö¿ªº°
¼Ò°³
°ú°Å ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®, 2019-2023³â
ÇöÀç ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð(±Ý¾×) ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø, 2024-2031³â
ºÏ¹Ì
¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«
À¯·´
¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç
Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«(MEA)
Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀå ¸Å·Âµµ ºÐ¼®
Á¦13Àå ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
Á¦14Àå ¶óÆ¾¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
Á¦15Àå À¯·´ÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
Á¦16Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
Á¦17Àå Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
Á¦18Àå ÁÖ¿ä ±¹°¡ÀÇ µµÄ¿ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®°ú ¿¹Ãø
¼Ò°³
ÁÖ¿ä ±¹°¡º° ½ÃÀå ±Ý¾× ºñÀ² ºÐ¼®
¼¼°è¿Í ±¹°¡º° ¼ºÀå ºñ±³
¹Ì±¹
ij³ª´Ù
¸ß½ÃÄÚ
ºê¶óÁú
µ¶ÀÏ
ÇÁ¶û½º
ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
º£³×·è½º
¿µ±¹
ºÏÀ¯·´
Áß±¹
ÀϺ»
Çѱ¹
GCC ±¹°¡
³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ±¹
ÅÍŰ
Á¦19Àå ½ÃÀå ±¸Á¶ ºÐ¼®
±â¾÷ °èÃþº° ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®
½ÃÀå ÁýÁß
ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®
½ÃÀå ÀÔÁö ºÐ¼®
Á¦20Àå °æÀï ºÐ¼®
°æÀï ´ë½Ãº¸µå
°æÀï º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©
°æÀï »ó¼¼
Dynatrace
Appdynamics
New Relic
Broadcom
Microsoft
Splunk
Datadog
BMC Software
IBM
Sysdig
Á¦21Àå »ç¿ëµÇ´Â °¡Á¤°ú µÎ¹®ÀÚ¾î
Á¦22Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý
ksm
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷
The Docker Monitoring Market report by Persistence Market Research provides an in-depth analysis of the market dynamics, growth factors, challenges, and emerging trends. It covers data and statistics on the market's trajectory from 2024 to 2031, helping stakeholders understand the current state and future outlook of the Docker Monitoring Market.
The worldwide docker monitoring market is expected to increase at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.8% from US$ 750 Million in 2024 to US$ 2.8 Billion by 2032.
Key Insights:
Estimated Market Size (2024): USD 750 Million
Projected Market Size (2032): USD 2.8 Billion
Global Market Growth Rate (CAGR 2024 to 2032): 17.8%
Docker Monitoring Market - Report Scope:
The widespread adoption of Docker and containerization in enterprise IT has created a significant need for monitoring solutions. Docker monitoring tools allow businesses to track the performance, security, and compliance of their containerized applications. These solutions play a critical role in identifying issues, optimizing resources, and ensuring the seamless operation of microservices architectures. The report outlines the key drivers behind the demand for Docker monitoring solutions, including the rapid growth of cloud-native applications, increased use of microservices, and the need for enhanced scalability and flexibility in modern IT environments.
Market Growth Drivers:
The market's growth is driven by several factors. Firstly, the rapid adoption of DevOps practices and cloud computing has led to a surge in containerized applications, necessitating advanced monitoring solutions. Docker monitoring tools provide visibility into containerized environments, helping organizations ensure high performance and compliance. Secondly, businesses are increasingly focusing on automation and scalability, further boosting the demand for Docker monitoring tools that can manage large-scale deployments efficiently. Lastly, compliance requirements and security concerns drive companies to implement robust monitoring solutions to meet regulatory standards and safeguard sensitive data.
Market Restraints:
Despite the growth potential, the Docker Monitoring Market faces some challenges. The complexity of monitoring containerized environments can be daunting, especially for organizations with limited expertise in containerization. The lack of standardized monitoring practices may lead to inconsistent results and hinder the efficient adoption of Docker monitoring solutions. Additionally, security vulnerabilities in Docker containers, such as misconfigurations and outdated components, can pose significant risks, requiring constant vigilance and effective monitoring tools.
Market Opportunities:
The Docker Monitoring Market offers significant opportunities for innovation and expansion. The growing trend towards hybrid and multi-cloud environments presents a chance for monitoring solution providers to develop tools that support various platforms. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in monitoring tools allows for predictive analytics, enabling proactive issue resolution. Furthermore, partnerships with cloud service providers and DevOps toolchains can expand the reach of Docker monitoring solutions and facilitate broader adoption.
Key Questions Addressed in the Report:
What is the Expected CAGR of the Docker Monitoring Market from 2024 to 2031?
What are the Key Factors Driving the Growth of the Docker Monitoring Market?
Which Region Holds the Largest Market Share in the Docker Monitoring Market?
Who are the Key Players in the Global Docker Monitoring Market?
What Strategies are Adopted by Leading Companies to Stay Competitive in the Docker Monitoring Market?
Competitive Landscape and Business Strategies:
Key players in the Docker Monitoring Market include Dynatrace, Datadog, Splunk, New Relic, and Sysdig. These companies focus on innovation and integration to maintain a competitive edge in the market. Dynatrace, for instance, is known for its AI-powered monitoring capabilities, while Datadog specializes in multi-cloud monitoring solutions. Companies employ strategies such as expanding product portfolios, forming strategic partnerships, and investing in R&D to drive growth. The competitive landscape is characterized by a focus on enhancing user experience, providing robust security features, and offering scalable solutions for enterprises of varying sizes.
Key Companies Profiled:
Dynatrace
Datadog
Splunk
New Relic
Sysdig
AppDynamics (Cisco)
Logz.io
IBM
Prometheus
Grafana Labs
Docker Monitoring Market Segmentation:
By Component:
By Application:
Infrastructure Monitoring
Application Performance Monitoring
Security and Compliance Monitoring
By Deployment Mode:
By End User:
IT and Telecommunications
BFSI
Healthcare
Retail and E-commerce
Manufacturing
Government and Defense
By Region:
North America
Europe
Asia Pacific
Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Summary of Statistics
1.3. Key Market Characteristics & Attributes
1.4. PMR Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage
2.2. Market Definition
3. Market Risks and Trends Assessment
3.1. Risk Assessment
3.1.1. COVID-19 Crisis and Impact on Docker Monitoring
3.1.2. COVID-19 Impact Benchmark with Previous Crisis
3.1.3. Impact on Market Value (US$ Mn)
3.1.4. Assessment by Key Countries
3.1.5. Assessment by Key Market Segments
3.1.6. Action Points and Recommendation for Suppliers
3.2. Key Trends Impacting the Market
3.3. Formulation and Product Development Trends
4. Market Background
4.1. Docker Monitoring Market, by Key Countries
4.2. Docker Monitoring Market Opportunity Assessment (US$ Mn)
4.2.1. Total Available Market
4.2.2. Serviceable Addressable Market
4.2.3. Serviceable Obtainable Market
4.3. Market Scenario Forecast
4.3.1. Demand in optimistic Scenario
4.3.2. Demand in Likely Scenario
4.3.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario
4.4. Investment Feasibility Analysis
4.4.1. Investment in Established Markets
4.4.1.1. In Short Term
4.4.1.2. In Long Term
4.4.2. Investment in Emerging Markets
4.4.2.1. In Short Term
4.4.2.2. In Long Term
4.5. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact
4.5.1. Top Companies Historical Growth
4.5.2. Growth in Automation, By Country
4.5.3. Docker Monitoring Adoption Rate, By Country
4.6. Market Dynamics
4.6.1. Market Driving Factors and Impact Assessment
4.6.2. Prominent Market Challenges and Impact Assessment
4.6.3. Docker Monitoring Market Opportunities
4.6.4. Prominent Trends in the Global Market & Their Impact Assessment
5. Key Success Factors
5.1. Manufacturers' Focus on Low Penetration High Growth Markets
5.2. Banking on with Segments High Incremental Opportunity
5.3. Peer Benchmarking
6. Global Docker Monitoring Market Demand Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast, 2024-2031
6.1. Historical Market Analysis, 2019-2023
6.2. Current and Future Market Projections, 2024-2031
6.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
7. Global Docker Monitoring Market Value Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast, 2024-2031
7.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Analysis, 2019-2023
7.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Mn) Projections, 2024-2031
7.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
7.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
8. Global Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031, By Organization Size
8.1. Introduction / Key Findings
8.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Organization Size, 2019-2023
8.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Organization Size, 2024-2031
8.3.1. SMEs
8.3.2. Large Enterprises
8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Organization Size
9. Global Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031, By Industry Vertical
9.1. Introduction / Key Findings
9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Industry Vertical, 2019-2023
9.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Industry Vertical, 2024-2031
9.3.1. Information Technology (IT) and Telecom
9.3.2. Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI)
9.3.3. eCommerce and Retail
9.3.4. Media and Entertainment
9.3.5. Travel and Hospitality
9.3.6. Healthcare and Life Sciences
9.3.7. Others
9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Industry Vertical
10. Global Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031, By Deployment Mode
10.1. Introduction / Key Findings
10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Deployment Mode, 2019-2023
10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Deployment Mode, 2024-2031
10.3.1. On-premises
10.3.2. Cloud
10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Deployment Mode
11. Global Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031, By Component
11.1. Introduction / Key Findings
11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Component, 2019-2023
11.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Component, 2024-2031
11.3.1. Solution
11.3.2. Services
11.3.2.1. Integration and Implementation Services
11.3.2.2. Consulting Services
11.3.2.3. Training and Support Services
11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Component
12. Global Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031, By Region
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Region, 2019-2023
12.3. Current Market Size (US$ Mn) & Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2024-2031
12.3.1. North America
12.3.2. Latin America
12.3.3. Europe
12.3.4. Asia Pacific
12.3.5. Middle East and Africa (MEA)
12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
13. North America Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031
13.1. Introduction
13.2. Pricing Analysis
13.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2023
13.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
13.4.1. By Country
13.4.1.1. U.S.
13.4.1.2. Canada
13.4.1.3. Rest of North America
13.4.2. By Organization Size
13.4.3. By Industry Vertical
13.4.4. By Component
13.4.5. By Deployment Mode
13.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.5.1. By Country
13.5.2. By Organization Size
13.5.3. By Industry Vertical
13.5.4. By Component
13.5.5. By Deployment Mode
14. Latin America Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031
14.1. Introduction
14.2. Pricing Analysis
14.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2023
14.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
14.4.1. By Country
14.4.1.1. Brazil
14.4.1.2. Mexico
14.4.1.3. Rest of Latin America
14.4.2. By Organization Size
14.4.3. By Industry Vertical
14.4.4. By Component
14.4.5. By Deployment Mode
14.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
14.5.1. By Country
14.5.2. By Organization Size
14.5.3. By Industry Vertical
14.5.4. By Component
14.5.5. By Deployment Mode
15. Europe Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031
15.1. Introduction
15.2. Pricing Analysis
15.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2023
15.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
15.4.1. By Country
15.4.1.1. Germany
15.4.1.2. France
15.4.1.3. U.K.
15.4.1.4. Italy
15.4.1.5. Benelux
15.4.1.6. Nordic Countries
15.4.1.7. Rest of Europe
15.4.2. By Organization Size
15.4.3. By Industry Vertical
15.4.4. By Component
15.4.5. By Deployment Mode
15.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
15.5.1. By Country
15.5.2. By Organization Size
15.5.3. By Industry Vertical
15.5.4. By Component
15.5.5. By Deployment Mode
16. Asia Pacific Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031
16.1. Introduction
16.2. Pricing Analysis
16.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2023
16.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
16.4.1. By Country
16.4.1.1. China
16.4.1.2. Japan
16.4.1.3. South Korea
16.4.1.4. Rest of Asia Pacific
16.4.2. By Organization Size
16.4.3. By Industry Vertical
16.4.4. By Component
16.4.5. By Deployment Mode
16.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
16.5.1. By Country
16.5.2. By Organization Size
16.5.3. By Industry Vertical
16.5.4. By Component
16.5.5. By Deployment Mode
17. Middle East and Africa Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031
17.1. Introduction
17.2. Pricing Analysis
17.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2023
17.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
17.4.1. By Country
17.4.1.1. GCC Countries
17.4.1.2. South Africa
17.4.1.3. Turkey
17.4.1.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
17.4.2. By Organization Size
17.4.3. By Industry Vertical
17.4.4. By Component
17.4.5. By Deployment Mode
17.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
17.5.1. By Country
17.5.2. By Organization Size
17.5.3. By Industry Vertical
17.5.4. By Component
17.5.5. By Deployment Mode
18. Key Countries Docker Monitoring Market Analysis 2019-2023 and Forecast 2024-2031
18.1. Introduction
18.1.1. Market Value Proportion Analysis, By Key Countries
18.1.2. Global Vs. Country Growth Comparison
18.2. US Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.2.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.2.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.2.2.1. By Organization Size
18.2.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.2.2.3. By Component
18.2.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.3. Canada Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.3.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.3.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.3.2.1. By Organization Size
18.3.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.3.2.3. By Component
18.3.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.4. Mexico Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.4.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.4.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.4.2.1. By Organization Size
18.4.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.4.2.3. By Component
18.4.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.5. Brazil Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.5.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.5.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.5.2.1. By Organization Size
18.5.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.5.2.3. By Component
18.5.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.6. Germany Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.6.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.6.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.6.2.1. By Organization Size
18.6.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.6.2.3. By Component
18.6.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.7. France Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.7.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.7.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.7.2.1. By Organization Size
18.7.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.7.2.3. By Component
18.7.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.8. Italy Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.8.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.8.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.8.2.1. By Organization Size
18.8.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.8.2.3. By Component
18.8.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.9. BENELUX Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.9.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.9.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.9.2.1. By Organization Size
18.9.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.9.2.3. By Component
18.9.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.10. UK Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.10.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.10.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.10.2.1. By Organization Size
18.10.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.10.2.3. By Component
18.10.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.11. Nordic Countries Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.11.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.11.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.11.2.1. By Organization Size
18.11.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.11.2.3. By Component
18.11.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.12. China Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.12.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.12.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.12.2.1. By Organization Size
18.12.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.12.2.3. By Component
18.12.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.13. Japan Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.13.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.13.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.13.2.1. By Organization Size
18.13.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.13.2.3. By Component
18.13.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.14. South Korea Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.14.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.14.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.14.2.1. By Organization Size
18.14.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.14.2.3. By Component
18.14.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.15. GCC Countries Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.15.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.15.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.15.2.1. By Organization Size
18.15.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.15.2.3. By Component
18.15.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.16. South Africa Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.16.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.16.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.16.2.1. By Organization Size
18.16.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.16.2.3. By Component
18.16.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.17. Turkey Docker Monitoring Market Analysis
18.17.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
18.17.2. Value Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2024-2031
18.17.2.1. By Organization Size
18.17.2.2. By Industry Vertical
18.17.2.3. By Component
18.17.2.4. By Deployment Mode
18.17.3. Competition Landscape and Player Concentration in the Country
19. Market Structure Analysis
19.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies
19.2. Market Concentration
19.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
19.4. Market Presence Analysis
19.4.1. By Regional footprint of Players
19.4.2. Product footprint by Players
20. Competition Analysis
20.1. Competition Dashboard
20.2. Competition Benchmarking
20.3. Competition Deep Dive
20.3.1. Dynatrace
20.3.1.1. Overview
20.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.1.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.1.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.2. Appdynamics
20.3.2.1. Overview
20.3.2.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.2.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.2.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.3. New Relic
20.3.3.1. Overview
20.3.3.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.3.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.3.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.4. Broadcom
20.3.4.1. Overview
20.3.4.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.4.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.4.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.5. Microsoft
20.3.5.1. Overview
20.3.5.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.5.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.5.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.6. Splunk
20.3.6.1. Overview
20.3.6.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.6.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.6.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.7. Datadog
20.3.7.1. Overview
20.3.7.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.7.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.7.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.8. BMC Software
20.3.8.1. Overview
20.3.8.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.8.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.8.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.9. IBM
20.3.9.1. Overview
20.3.9.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.9.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.9.4. Strategy Overview
20.3.10. Sysdig
20.3.10.1. Overview
20.3.10.2. Product Portfolio
20.3.10.3. Sales Footprint
20.3.10.4. Strategy Overview
21. Assumptions and Acronyms Used
22. Research Methodology
°ü·ÃÀÚ·á