The global CIP market size is projected to grow from USD 153.93 billion in 2025 to USD 197.13 billion by 2030 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.1% during the forecast period. The rising need to safeguard essential assets and services against evolving cyber and physical threats drives the market.
Scope of the Report
Years Considered for the Study
2019-2030
Base Year
2024
Forecast Period
2025-2030
Units Considered
Value (USD Million/USD Billion)
Segments
Offering, Vertical, and Region
Regions covered
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America
Organizations are widely adopting integrated protection solutions that combine advanced surveillance, access control, threat detection, and cybersecurity measures to strengthen resilience. This reduces downtime, mitigates risks, and ensures continuity of operations across the energy, utilities, and transportation sectors.
However, a major restraint is the interoperability gap among CIP solutions. Many tools are developed in silos, resulting in fragmented protection that fails to integrate effectively. This complicates security management and leaves critical assets vulnerable. Furthermore, limited coordination and information sharing between the government and private sectors hinder unified defense strategies.
"Services segment within the physical security offerings is expected to record the highest CAGR during the forecast period"
The services segment within physical security offerings is projected to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period. This growth is driven by the increasing demand for design, consulting, integration, maintenance, and managed services to ensure robust protection of critical facilities. As organizations face evolving threats, reliance on specialized service providers for deploying advanced physical security systems and ensuring continuous monitoring and support has grown significantly. The trend highlights the crucial role of professional expertise and ongoing service delivery in enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructure.
"OT & ICS security platform segment is projected to hold the largest market share during the forecast period"
By OT cybersecurity solutions, the OT & ICS security platform segment is expected to hold the largest market share within OT cybersecurity solutions during the forecast period. This dominance is driven by the increasing need to secure operational technology environments, including industrial control systems (ICS), supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, and other mission-critical infrastructure. With the rising frequency of cyberattacks targeting industrial networks and the growing convergence of IT and OT systems, organizations are prioritizing comprehensive OT & ICS security platforms. These solutions provide asset visibility, real-time threat detection, and protection against advanced persistent threats, ensuring operational resilience and minimizing downtime in critical sectors such as energy, utilities, oil & gas, and manufacturing.
"North America is expected to hold the largest market share during forecast period"
North America accounts for the largest market share among all regions. It leads the CIP market due to strong regulatory frameworks, high investments in security technologies, and early adoption of integrated protection solutions. With energy, finance, and transportation being prime targets, North America emphasizes large-scale deployment of advanced CIP systems. Additionally, government initiatives, cybersecurity mandates, and cross-sector collaboration further accelerate adoption across the US and Canada.
Breakdown of primaries
The study contains insights from various industry experts, from component suppliers to Tier 1 companies and OEMs. The break-up of the primaries is as follows:
By Company Type: Tier 1 - 40%, Tier 2 - 35%, and Tier 3 - 25%
By Designation: C-level - 45%, Directors - 35%, and Managers - 20%
By Region: North America - 55%, Europe - 25%, Asia Pacific - 15%, RoW - 5%
The key players in the CIP market include BAE Systems (US), Lockheed Martin (US), General Dynamics (US), Northrop Grumman (US), Honeywell (US), Airbus (France), Thales (France), Hexagon AB (Sweden), Johnson Controls (US), Motorola Solutions (US), Axis Communications (Sweden), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), and others.
The study includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the key players in the CIP market, their company profiles, recent developments, and key market strategies.
Research Coverage
The report segments the CIP market and forecasts its size by offering into Physical Security Offering (Systems {Perimeter Protection, Surveillance & Monitoring Systems, Access Control Systems, Screening & Scanning Systems, and Emergency Communication Systems} and Services {Professional Services and Managed Services}, IT Cybersecurity Solutions (Solutions (Network & Endpoint Protection, Identity & Access Management (IAM) Solutions, Cloud & Application Security, Encryption & Data Protection, Threat Detection & Response Platform, Compliance & Policy Management, Patch Management, and Data Backup & Recovery} and Services {Professional Services and Managed Services}) and OT Cybersecurity Solutions (Solution {OT & ICS Security Platform, IoT & IIoT Security Solutions, OT Threat Detection & Monitoring, Digital Twin Platform, and Asset Identification & Visibility} and Services {Professional Services and Managed Services}). The verticals covered in the CIP market include Financial Institutions, Government, Defense, Transport & Logistics, Energy & Power, Commercial Sector, Telecom, Chemicals & Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, and Other Verticals. By region, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America.
The study also includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the market's key players, their company profiles, key observations related to product and business offerings, recent developments, and key market strategies.
Key Benefits of Buying the Report
The report will help market leaders and new entrants with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall CIP market and the subsegments. It will also help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. The report also helps stakeholders understand the market pulse and provides information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.
The report provides insights into the following pointers:
Analysis of key drivers (rising cyberattacks on critical infrastructure systems, government initiatives to boost demand for critical infrastructure protection, and technological developments to drive evolution in critical infrastructure protection), restraints (lack of trained cybersecurity professionals and interoperability gap among critical infrastructure protection solutions), opportunities (rising adoption of IoT and rising infrastructure investment spurs demand for enhanced protection measures), and challenges (supply chain vulnerabilities threaten critical infrastructure and high implementation and maintenance cost)
Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights into upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and new product & service launches in the CIP market
Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets - analysis of the CIP market across varied regions
Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products & services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the CIP market
Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and service offerings of leading players such as BAE Systems (US), Lockheed Martin (US), General Dynamics (US), Northrop Grumman (US), Honeywell (US), Airbus (France), Thales (France), Hexagon AB (Sweden), Johnson Controls (US), Motorola Solutions (US), Axis Communications (Sweden), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Cisco (US), Huawei (China), G4S (UK), GE Vernova (US), NEC (Japan), Bruker (US), Fujitsu (Japan), Tenable (US), Rolta (India), ServiceNow (US), Luna-OptaSense (UK), Teltronic (Spain), Waterfall Security Solutions (Israel), Westminster Group (UK), Owl Cyber Defense Solutions (US), Achilles Heel Technologies (US), CIPS Security (US), Suprema Inc. (South Korea), Industrial Defender (US), Terma (Denmark), Ericsson (Sweden), Rehbo AG (Germany), Leidos (US), Mecom Medien-Communications (Germany), Kloch (US), Siemens (Germany), and Cambium Networks (US)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
1.3 STUDY SCOPE
1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION AND REGIONAL SCOPE
1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
1.5 STAKEHOLDERS
1.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH DATA
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
2.1.2.1 Breakup of primaries
2.1.2.2 Key industry insights
2.2 MARKET BREAKUP AND DATA TRIANGULATION
2.3 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
2.3.1 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
2.3.2 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
2.4 MARKET FORECAST
2.5 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
2.6 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS
4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR KEY MARKET PLAYERS
4.2 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY OFFERING
4.3 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY PHYSICAL SECURITY OFFERING
4.4 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY SYSTEM
4.5 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY SERVICE
4.6 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY IT CYBERSECURITY OFFERING
4.7 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY IT CYBERSECURITY SOLUTION
4.8 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY IT CYBERSECURITY SERVICE
4.9 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY OT CYBERSECURITY OFFERING
4.10 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY OT CYBERSECURITY SOLUTION
4.11 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY OT CYBERSECURITY SERVICE
4.12 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET, BY VERTICAL
4.13 MARKET INVESTMENT SCENARIO
5 MARKET OVERVIEW AND INDUSTRY TRENDS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
5.2.1 DRIVERS
5.2.1.1 Rising cyberattacks on critical infrastructure systems
5.2.1.2 Government initiatives to boost demand for critical infrastructure protection
5.2.1.3 Technological developments to drive evolution in critical infrastructure protection
5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
5.2.2.1 Lack of trained cybersecurity professionals
5.2.2.2 Interoperability gap among critical infrastructure protection solutions
5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
5.2.3.1 Rising adoption of IoT
5.2.3.2 Rising infrastructure investment to spur demand for enhanced protection measures
5.2.4 CHALLENGES
5.2.4.1 Supply chain vulnerabilities to threaten critical infrastructure
5.2.4.2 High implementation and maintenance costs
5.3 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
5.3.1 CASE STUDY 1: ALTA PREVENTED MALICIOUS FILE UPLOADS WITH ZERO TRUST CDR
5.3.2 CASE STUDY 2: ITALIAN EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER GUARDED AGAINST INSIDER THREATS WITH FORCEPOINT
5.3.3 CASE STUDY 3: CONSOLIDATED EDISON-PATROLLED AIRSPACE WITH AXIS 360-DEGREE CAMERAS AND DEDRONE COUNTER-DRONE SOLUTION
5.3.4 CASE STUDY 4: TOSIBOX REVOLUTIONIZED REMOTE CONNECTIVITY FOR NWCPUD UTILITIES
5.3.5 CASE STUDY 5: MANIPAL UNIVERSITY STRENGTHENED PHYSICAL SECURITY AND CAMPUS OPERATIONS WITH HONEYWELL'S SMART CARD SOLUTION
5.3.6 CASE STUDY 6: ADT'S INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE ENHANCED PHYSICAL SECURITY AND OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AT DUBLIN AIRPORT TERMINAL 2
5.3.7 CASE STUDY 7: WESCO'S INTEGRATED NETWORK UPGRADE STRENGTHENED PHYSICAL AND CYBERSECURITY IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE
5.3.8 CASE STUDY 8: PELCO'S PHYSICAL SECURITY TRANSFORMATION AT CHESAPEAKE BAY BRIDGE-TUNNEL SECURED VITAL TRANSPORTATION LINK
5.3.9 CASE STUDY 9: HAURAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL SECURED CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND MANAGED THIRD-PARTY RISK WITH DARKTRACE AI
5.3.10 CASE STUDY 10: ALGOSEC HELPED NCR CORPORATION ACHIEVE ZERO TRUST SECURITY
5.4 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
5.4.1 COMPONENT PROVIDERS
5.4.2 PLANNING AND DESIGNING ORGANIZATIONS
5.4.3 SOLUTION AND SERVICE PROVIDERS
5.4.4 SYSTEM INTEGRATORS
5.4.5 RETAIL/DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
5.4.6 END USERS
5.5 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
5.6 PORTER'S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
5.6.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
5.6.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
5.6.3 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
5.6.4 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
5.6.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
5.7 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
5.7.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
5.7.2 BUYING CRITERIA
5.8 IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET
5.8.1 GENERATIVE AI
5.8.2 TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL FOR CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MARKET
5.8.3 IMPACT OF GEN AI ON INTERCONNECTED AND ADJACENT ECOSYSTEMS
5.8.3.1 OT Security
5.8.3.2 Physical Security
5.8.3.3 Cybersecurity
5.8.3.4 Incident Response
5.8.3.5 Critical Incident Reconstruction
5.9 PRICING ANALYSIS
5.9.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY SYSTEM, 2024
5.9.2 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS, BY OFFERING, 2024