세계의 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장 예측(-2029년) : 오퍼링별, 기술별, 업계별, 실장별, 용도별, 지역별
Structural health monitoring Market by Offering (Hardware, Software & Services), Technology (Wired, Wireless), Vertical (Civil Infrastructure, Aerospace & Defense, Energy, Mining), Implementation, Application and Region - Global Forecast to 2029
상품코드:1463248
리서치사:MarketsandMarkets
발행일:2024년 04월
페이지 정보:영문 246 Pages
라이선스 & 가격 (부가세 별도)
ㅁ Add-on 가능: 고객의 요청에 따라 일정한 범위 내에서 Customization이 가능합니다. 자세한 사항은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
한글목차
세계의 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장 규모는 2024년에 25억 달러에 달할 것으로 보이며, 2029년에는 41억 달러에 달할 것으로 예측되고 있으며, 예측 기간 중 CAGR은 10.4%로 전망됩니다.
이 시장의 성장은 중요 인프라의 자동 정비 및 수리의 중요성 증가, 인명 및 자본 손실로 이어지는 구조적 결함의 막대한 영향, 인프라 부문에 대한 막대한 투자, 지속가능한 건설 관행을 촉진하는 엄격한 정부 규제, 구조적 건전성 모니터링 시스템 채택을 촉진하는 인프라 노후화 등 여러 가지 요인에 의해 주도되고 있습니다, 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 산업과 관련된 비용 효율성 등 몇 가지 중요한 요인으로 인해 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 산업이 성장하고 있습니다.
조사 범위
조사 대상년
2020-2029년
기준년
2023년
예측 기간
2024-2029년
검토 단위
금액(10억 달러)
부문별
오퍼링별, 기술별, 업계별, 실장별, 용도별, 지역별
대상 지역
북미, 유럽, 아시아태평양, 기타 지역
하드웨어 부문은 주로 모니터링 대상 구조물의 물리적 특성을 측정하는 데 필수적인 역할을 하기 때문에 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장에서 가장 큰 점유율을 차지할 것으로 예상됩니다. 하드웨어 부문에서 센서는 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템의 데이터 수집에 중요한 역할을 합니다. 센서와 데이터 수집 시스템을 물리적으로 연결하는 유선 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시스템은 데이터 수집의 안정성과 정확성으로 인해 중요한 인프라 모니터링 용도에 선호되는 선택이 되고 있습니다.
유선 기술은 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템에서 큰 비중을 차지하고 있습니다. 유선 시스템은 센서와 데이터 수집 장비 간의 물리적 연결을 구축하여 구조물의 건전성을 모니터링하는 신뢰할 수 있고 확립된 접근 방식을 제공합니다. 이 방법은 교량, 건물, 굴뚝, 해상 플랫폼, 원자력 시설 등 안전 및 내구성 기준이 까다로운 대규모 구조물 모니터링에 자주 사용됩니다. 유선 솔루션은 안정성과 데이터 수집의 정확성을 인정받아 신뢰성과 정확성이 가장 중요한 중요 인프라 모니터링에 적합한 선택이 되고 있습니다.
항공우주 및 방위산업은 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 분야에서 가장 높은 시장 성장이 예상되는 분야입니다. 이러한 성장은 안전과 신뢰성을 보장하기 위해 항공우주 산업에서 중요 부품의 비파괴 검사에 기인합니다.
세계의 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장에 대해 조사했으며, 오퍼링별, 기술별, 업계별, 실장별, 용도별, 지역별 동향 및 시장에 참여하는 기업의 개요 등을 정리하여 전해드립니다.
목차
제1장 서론
제2장 조사 방법
제3장 주요 요약
제4장 중요 인사이트
제5장 시장 개요
서론
시장 역학
고객의 비즈니스에 영향을 미치는 동향/혼란
가격 분석
공급망 분석
에코시스템 분석
투자와 자금조달 시나리오
기술 분석
특허 분석
무역 분석
2024-2025년의 주요 컨퍼런스와 이벤트
사례 연구 분석
관세와 규제 상황
Porter's Five Forces 분석
주요 이해관계자와 구입 기준
제6장 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템의 실장 방법
서론
신축
개조
제7장 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템의 응용
서론
크랙 탐지
손상 탐지
영향 감시
부식 감시
스트레인 모니터링
핫스팟 감시
상태 탐지
멀티모달 센싱
압력 감시
누출 탐지
굴곡 감시
허리케인과 지진 감시
제8장 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장, 오퍼링별
서론
하드웨어
소프트웨어와 서비스
제9장 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장, 기술별
서론
유선
무선
제10장 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장, 업계별
서론
토목 인프라
항공우주 및 방위
에너지
광업
기타
제11장 구조 건전성 모니터링 시스템 시장, 지역별
서론
북미
유럽
아시아태평양
기타 지역
제12장 경쟁 구도
개요
주요 기업이 채택하는 전략, 2020-2023년
주요 기업의 매출 분석, 2019-2023년
시장 점유율 분석, 2023년
기업 가치 평가와 재무 지표
브랜드/제품 비교
기업 평가 매트릭스 : 주요 참여 기업, 2023년
기업 평가 매트릭스 : 스타트업/중소기업, 2023년
경쟁 시나리오와 동향
제13장 기업 개요
주요 참여 기업
COWI A/S
CAMPBELL SCIENTIFIC, INC.
GEOKON
NOVA METRIX
SGS SA
TRIMBLE INC.
SIXENSE
STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEMS PLC.
ACELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DIGITEXX DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
기타 기업
FIRST SENSOR AG
BDI
SISGEO
RST INSTRUMENTS LTD.
AVT RELIABILITY
GEOMOTION SINGAPORE
STRAINSTALL(JAMES FISHER AND SONS PLC.)
HBK
KINEMETRICS
FEAC ENGINEERING P.C.
EFI GLOBAL, INC.
SENSURON
INFIBRA TECHNOLOGIES
SODIS LAB
SET POINT TECHNOLOGIES
MISTRAS GROUP
METIS DESIGN CORPORATION
GEOSIG LTD.
제14장 부록
KSA
영문 목차
영문목차
The global structural health monitoring market was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 4.1 billion by 2029; it is expected to register a CAGR of 10.4% during the forecast period. The market's growth is driven by several key factors, including the rising significance of automated maintenance and repair for critical infrastructures, the far-reaching consequences of structural failures leading to loss of lives and capital, substantial investments in the infrastructure sector, stringent government regulations promoting sustainable construction practices, aging infrastructure prompting the adoption of structural health monitoring, and the cost efficiencies associated with the structural health monitoring industry.
Scope of the Report
Years Considered for the Study
2020-2029
Base Year
2023
Forecast Period
2024-2029
Units Considered
Value (USD Billion)
Segments
By Offering, Technology, Vertical, Implementation, Application and Region
Regions covered
North America, Europe, APAC, RoW
"The hardware segment to hold the largest share during the forecast period."
The hardware segment is anticipated to hold the largest share of the structural health monitoring market, primarily due to its integral role in measuring the physical properties of structures under surveillance. Within the hardware segment, sensors play a crucial role in collecting data for structural health monitoring systems. Wired structural health monitoring systems, which involve physical connections between sensors and data acquisition systems, are known for their stability and accuracy in data acquisition, making them a preferred choice for critical infrastructure monitoring applications.
"the wired technology segment to record largest market share during the forecast period."
The wired technology holds a substantial market share in structural health monitoring. Wired systems establish physical connections between sensors and data acquisition units, providing a dependable and well-established approach to monitoring structural integrity. This method is frequently employed for overseeing extensive structures with stringent safety and durability criteria such as bridges, buildings, chimneys, offshore platforms, and nuclear facilities. Wired solutions are recognized for their stability and precision in data collection, making them a favored option for critical infrastructure monitoring where reliability and accuracy are paramount.
"The Aerospace & Defence is likely to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period."
The Aerospace & Defense vertical is expected to experience highest market growth in the field of structural health monitoring. This growth is attributed to the non-destructive inspection of critical components in the aerospace industry to ensure safety and reliability. Companies like Testia and CURTISS-WRIGHT are prominent players in this sector, emphasizing the importance of structural health monitoring for aerospace applications. The rise in investments in infrastructure, particularly in the aerospace and defense sectors, is driving the demand for advanced monitoring systems to enhance safety and operational efficiency
"The Europe segment is likely to grow at the third highest CAGR during the forecast period."
The European market for structural health monitoring market is experiencing significant growth, primarily attributed to several factors. The European structural health monitoring (SHM) market is poised for substantial growth due to multiple converging factors. Firstly, aging infrastructure across Europe, including bridges and transportation networks, necessitates proactive management through SHM to detect issues early and prevent costly failures. Secondly, increased government investment in infrastructure renovation projects presents opportunities for integrating SHM solutions to ensure infrastructure longevity and safety. Thirdly, stringent safety regulations drive the demand for SHM by providing continuous monitoring data to ensure compliance and prioritize public safety. Furthermore, SHM contributes to sustainability goals by extending the lifespan of structures and optimizing resource utilization. Technological advancements in sensor technology and digitalization in construction enhance the accessibility and integration of SHM solutions. Additionally, growing awareness and expertise, focus on non-destructive testing, cost benefits, and applications beyond traditional infrastructure further fuel the growth of the SHM market in Europe.
Breakdown of primaries
The study contains insights from various industry experts, ranging from component suppliers to Tier 1 companies and OEMs. The break-up of the primaries is as follows:
By Company Type - Tier 1 - 50%, Tier 2 - 30%, Tier 3 - 20%
By Region-North America - 40%, Europe - 25%, Asia Pacific - 20%, RoW - 15%
The structural health monitoring market is dominated by a few globally established players such as COWI A/S (Denmark), Campbell Scientific (US), Geokon (US), Nova Metrix LLC (US), SGS SA (Switzerland), Trimble Inc. (US), Structural Monitoring Systems PLC (Australia), Sixense (France), Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (US), and Acellent Technologies, Inc. (US). The study includes an in-depth competitive analysis of these key players in the structural health monitoring market, with their company profiles, recent developments, and key market strategies.
Research Coverage:
The report segments the structural health monitoring market and forecasts its size by offering, by technology, implementation, application, vertical, and region. The report also discusses the drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges pertaining to the market. It gives a detailed view of the market across four main regions-North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and RoW. Supply chain analysis has been included in the report, along with the key players and their competitive analysis in the structural health monitoring ecosystem.
Key Benefits to Buy the Report:
Analysis of key drivers (automation in maintenance & repair of infrastructure, loss of life and capital due to structural failures, increasing infrastructure investments,government regulations pertaining to sustainable structures, aging infrastructure and benefits associated with structural health monitoring, reduced costs of structural health monitoring systems). Restraint (high installation and monitoring costs, inaccurate results owing to errors in readings, slow adoption of structural health monitoring in developing countries). Opportunity (integration of advanced solutions for structural health monitoring, growing opportunities in Asia Pacific and GCC countries, advancements in sensor technologies, increasing investments in oil & gas and major energy projects). Challenges (dearth of skilled operators for installation and calibration of instruments, poor site conditions, technical challenges and operational factors, processing and management of large volumes of data)
Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research and development activities, and new productand services launches in the structural health monitoring market.
Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets - the report analyses the structural health monitoring market across varied regions
Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products and services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the structural health monitoring market.
Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and service offerings of leading players like COWI A/S (Denmark), Campbell Scientific (US), Geokon (US), Nova Metrix LLC (US), SGS SA (Switzerland), Trimble Inc. (US), Structural Monitoring Systems PLC (Australia), Sixense (France), Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (US), and Acellent Technologies, Inc. (US) among others in the structural health monitoring market.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
1.3 STUDY SCOPE
1.3.1 MARKETS COVERED
FIGURE 1 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SEGMENTATION
1.3.2 REGIONAL SCOPE
1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
1.3.4 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
1.5 UNITS CONSIDERED
1.6 LIMITATIONS
1.7 STAKEHOLDERS
1.8 SUMMARY OF CHANGES
1.9 IMPACT OF RECESSION
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH DATA
FIGURE 2 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: RESEARCH DESIGN
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
2.1.1.1 List of key secondary sources
2.1.1.2 Key data from secondary sources
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
2.1.2.1 List of primary interview participants
2.1.2.2 Key data from primary sources
2.1.2.3 Key industry insights
2.1.2.4 Breakdown of primaries
2.1.3 SECONDARY AND PRIMARY RESEARCH
2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY
2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
2.2.1.1 Approach to arrive at market size using bottom-up analysis (demand side)
FIGURE 3 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
FIGURE 4 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION: DEMAND-SIDE ANALYSIS
2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
2.2.2.1 Approach to arrive at market size using top-down analysis (supply side)
FIGURE 5 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: TOP-DOWN APPROACH
FIGURE 6 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION: SUPPLY-SIDE ANALYSIS
2.3 MARKET BREAKDOWN AND DATA TRIANGULATION
FIGURE 7 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: DATA TRIANGULATION
2.4 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
TABLE 1 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
2.5 RISK ASSESSMENT
TABLE 2 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: RISK ASSESSMENT
2.6 RECESSION IMPACT
TABLE 3 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: RECESSION IMPACT
2.7 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
FIGURE 8 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FIGURE 9 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, 2020-2029 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10 HARDWARE OFFERINGS TO ACCOUNT FOR LARGER MARKET SHARE IN 2024
FIGURE 11 WIRED TECHNOLOGY TO DOMINATE STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET BETWEEN 2024 AND 2029
FIGURE 12 CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE VERTICAL TO HOLD LARGEST MARKET SHARE IN 2029
FIGURE 13 ASIA PACIFIC TO EXHIBIT HIGHEST CAGR IN STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET FROM 2024 TO 2029
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS
4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET
FIGURE 14 RISING NEED TO MONITOR AGING INFRASTRUCTURE TO PROVIDE LUCRATIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET
4.2 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET, BY OFFERING
FIGURE 15 HARDWARE TO ACCOUNT FOR LARGER SHARE OF STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET, BY OFFERING, IN 2029
4.3 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET, BY VERTICAL
FIGURE 16 CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE TO DOMINATE MARKET FROM 2024 TO 2029
4.4 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY
FIGURE 17 WIRED TECHNOLOGY TO ACCOUNT FOR LARGER MARKET SHARE THAN WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY IN 2029
4.5 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET, BY REGION
FIGURE 18 NORTH AMERICA TO DOMINATE STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET DURING FORECAST PERIOD
5 MARKET OVERVIEW
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
FIGURE 19 STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET: DRIVERS, RESTRAINTS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES
5.2.1 DRIVERS
5.2.1.1 Rising automation of structural repair and maintenance processes
5.2.1.2 Increasing number of structurally deficient bridges
FIGURE 20 NUMBER OF STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT BRIDGES IN US, 2019-2023
5.2.1.3 Surging investment in infrastructure development projects
5.2.1.4 Increasing focus on developing advanced tools to ensure building safety
5.2.1.5 Growing concern about aging infrastructure
5.2.1.6 Rising adoption of micro-electromechanical systems and fiber optic sensors
FIGURE 21 IMPACT ANALYSIS: DRIVERS
5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
5.2.2.1 High installation and monitoring costs
5.2.2.2 Inaccurate readings due to design & calibration errors
TABLE 4 DESIGN AND CALIBRATION ERRORS AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES
5.2.2.3 Insufficient infrastructure investments in developing countries
FIGURE 22 IMPACT ANALYSIS: RESTRAINTS
5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
5.2.3.1 Introduction of AI-powered infrastructure asset management solutions
5.2.3.2 Population growth in emerging economies
5.2.3.3 Rapid advancement in sensor technologies
5.2.3.4 Increased funding for oil & gas projects
FIGURE 23 IMPACT ANALYSIS: OPPORTUNITIES
5.2.4 CHALLENGES
5.2.4.1 Shortage of highly skilled operators
5.2.4.2 Harsh weather and adverse site conditions
5.2.4.3 Complex installation processes
5.2.4.4 Difficulties in managing large volumes of data
TABLE 178 DIGITEXX DATA SYSTEMS, INC.: COMPANY OVERVIEW
TABLE 179 DIGITEXX DATA SYSTEMS, INC.: PRODUCTS/SOLUTIONS/SERVICES OFFERED
13.2 OTHER PLAYERS
13.2.1 FIRST SENSOR AG
13.2.2 BDI
13.2.3 SISGEO
13.2.4 RST INSTRUMENTS LTD.
13.2.5 AVT RELIABILITY
13.2.6 GEOMOTION SINGAPORE
13.2.7 STRAINSTALL ( JAMES FISHER AND SONS PLC.)
13.2.8 HBK
13.2.9 KINEMETRICS
13.2.10 FEAC ENGINEERING P.C.
13.2.11 EFI GLOBAL, INC.
13.2.12 SENSURON
13.2.13 INFIBRA TECHNOLOGIES
13.2.14 SODIS LAB
13.2.15 SET POINT TECHNOLOGIES
13.2.16 MISTRAS GROUP
13.2.17 METIS DESIGN CORPORATION
13.2.18 GEOSIG LTD.
*Details on Business Overview, Products/Solutions/Services Offered, Recent Developments, and MnM View (Key strengths/Right to Win, Strategic Choices Made, and Weaknesses and Competitive Threats) might not be captured in case of unlisted companies.
