pc ¹öÀüÀ¸·Î À̵¿ Áß
ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2023³â¿¡ ¿¬Æò±Õ º¹ÇÕ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR) 8.30%·Î 13¾ï 7,654¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. 2030³â¿¡´Â 24¾ï 1,276¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸£¸é¼ °æÀÌÀûÀÎ ¼ºÀåÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇÒ Àü¸ÁÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º´Â ¼¼°èÀÇ Ã¼¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ºñÁî´Ï½º Àü·«°ú Á¦Ç° ¸¸Á·µµÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÁöÇ¥¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© °ø±Þ¾÷ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Æò°¡¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ°í »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ ƯÁ¤ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÑ Á¤º¸¿¡ ÀÔ°¢ÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ °í±Þ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ °ø±Þ¾÷ü´Â ¼º°ø Á¤µµ°¡ ´Ù¸¥ 4°³ÀÇ »çºÐ¸é, Áï Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), Vital(V) µî 4°³ÀÇ »çºÐ¸éÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµË´Ï´Ù.
½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®Àº ƯÁ¤ ½ÃÀå ¿µ¿ª¿¡¼ °ø±Þ¾÷üÀÇ ÇöÀç »óŸ¦ ÆľÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Àüü ¼öÀÍ, °í°´ ±â¹Ý ¹× ±âŸ ÁÖ¿ä ÁöÇ¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¥´õÀÇ ±â¿©µµ¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷ÀÌ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²À» ³õ°í °æÀïÇÒ ¶§ ¾î¶² ¼º°ú¸¦ °ÅµÎ°í ÀÖ´ÂÁö, ¾î¶² »óȲ¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ´ÂÁö ´õ ±íÀÌ ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÀÌ ºÐ¼®Àº Á¶»çµÈ ±âÁØ ¿¬µµ¿¡ ƯÁ¤ ºÎ¹®ÀÇ °æÀï Á¤µµ, ÃàÀû, ¼¼ºÐÈ ¿ìÀ§, ÇÕº´ÀÇ Æ¯Â¡ µîÀ» ÆľÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº »çÇ׿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
1. ½ÃÀå ħÅõµµ : ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÌ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ½ÃÀå¿¡ °üÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
2. ½ÃÀå ¹ßÀü : À¯¸®ÇÑ ½ÅÈï ½ÃÀå¿¡ °üÇÑ »ó¼¼ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇϸç, ½ÃÀå ¼º¼÷ ºÎ¹® ħÅõµµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
3. ½ÃÀå ´Ù¾çÈ : ½ÅÁ¦Ç° Ãâ½Ã, ¹Ì°³¹ß Áö¿ª, ÃÖ±Ù °³¹ß, ÅõÀÚ¿¡ °üÇÑ »ó¼¼ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
4. ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ : COVID-19, ·¯½Ã¾Æ¡¤¿ìÅ©¶óÀ̳ª ºÐÀï, °íÀÎÇ÷¹À̼ÇÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâÀ» Á¾ÇÕÀû¿¡ ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
5. °æÀï Æò°¡¿Í Á¤º¸ : ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À², Àü·«, Á¦Ç°, ÀÎÁõ, ±ÔÁ¦ »óȲ, ƯÇã »óȲ, Á¦Á¶´É·ÂÀ» Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
6. Á¦Ç° °³¹ß ¹× Çõ½Å : ÇâÈÄ ±â¼ú, ¿¬±¸°³¹ß È°µ¿, ȹ±âÀûÀÎ Á¦Ç° °³¹ß¿¡ °üÇÑ ÁöÀû ÅëÂûÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ´ÙÀ½ Áú¹®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´äº¯ÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
1. ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð ¹× ¿¹ÃøÀº?
2. ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ Áß ¼¼°èÀÇ Ã¼¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â COVID-19ÀÇ ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀΰú ¿µÇâÀº?
3. ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå¿¡¼ ¿¹Ãø ±â°£Áß¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Á¦Ç°/ºÎ¹®/¿ëµµ/ºÐ¾ß´Â?
4. ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå °æÀï Àü·«Àº?
5. ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ±â¼ú µ¿Çâ°ú ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â?
6. ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ÁÖ¿ä º¥´õÀÇ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²Àº?
7. ü¿ÜÁø´Ü Ç°Áú°ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå¿¡ÀÇ Âü¿©¿¡´Â ¾î¶°ÇÑ Çüųª Àü·«ÀûÀÎ µ¿ÇâÀÌ ÀûÇÕÇÏ´Ù°í »ý°¢Çϴ°¡?
The Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market is forecasted to grow significantly, with a projected USD 1,376.54 million in 2023 at a CAGR of 8.30% and expected to reach a staggering USD 2,412.76 million by 2030.
The Cumulative Impact of COVID-19, the Russia-Ukraine Conflict, and High Inflation is expected to have significant long-term effects on the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market. The ongoing research considers the changes in consumer behavior, supply chain disruptions, and government interventions caused by the pandemic. Similarly, the report considers the ongoing political and economic uncertainty in Eastern Europe caused by the Russia-Ukraine Conflict and its potential implications for demand-supply balances, pressure on pricing variants, and import/export and trading. Additionally, the report addresses the impact of High Inflation on the global economy and details fiscal policies measuring and reducing its effects on demand, supply, cash flow, and currency exchange.
Based on Offering, market is studied across Data Management Solutions, Quality Assurance Services, and Quality Control Products. The Quality Control Products is further studied across Serum/Plasma-Based Controls, Urine-Based Controls, and Whole-Blood-Based Controls. The Quality Control Products commanded largest market share of 41.46% in 2022, followed by Data Management Solutions.
Based on Distributor, market is studied across OEM and Third-Party Control Manufacturers. The Third-Party Control Manufacturers is further studied across Independent Manufacturer Controls and Instrument-Specific Controls. The Third-Party Control Manufacturers commanded largest market share of 64.76% in 2022, followed by OEM.
Based on Application, market is studied across Clinical Chemistry, Coagulation or Hemostasis, Hematology, Immunochemistry, Microbiology, and Molecular Diagnostics. The Immunochemistry commanded largest market share of 21.32% in 2022, followed by Clinical Chemistry.
Based on End-User, market is studied across Clinical Laboratories, Hospitals, and Research & Academic Institutes. The Clinical Laboratories commanded largest market share of 57.27% in 2022, followed by Hospitals.
Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom. The Europe, Middle East & Africa commanded largest market share of 37.36% in 2022, followed by Americas.
The report provides market sizing and forecasts across 7 major currencies - USD, EUR, JPY, GBP, AUD, CAD, and CHF; multiple currency support helps organization leaders to make well-informed decisions. In this report, 2018 to 2021 are considered as historical years, 2022 is base year, 2023 is estimated year, and years from 2024 to 2030 are considered as forecast period.
The FPNV Positioning Matrix is essential for assessing the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market. It provides a comprehensive evaluation of vendors by examining key metrics within Business Strategy and Product Satisfaction, allowing users to make informed decisions based on their specific needs. This advanced analysis then organizes these vendors into four distinct quadrants, which represent varying levels of success: Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), or Vital(V).
The Market Share Analysis offers an insightful look at the current state of vendors in a particular market space. By comparing vendor contributions to overall revenue, customer base, and other key metrics, we can give companies a greater understanding of their performance and what they are up against when competing for market share. The analysis also sheds light on just how competitive any given sector is about accumulation, fragmentation dominance, and amalgamation traits over the base year period studied.
The report provides insights on the following pointers:
1. Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the key players
2. Market Development: Provides in-depth information about lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration across mature segments of the markets
3. Market Diversification: Provides detailed information about new product launches, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
4. Market Trends: Provides comprehensive understanding of the Cumulative Impact of COVID-19, the Russia-Ukraine Conflict, and the High Inflation
5. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certification, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players
6. Product Development & Innovation: Provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments
The report answers questions such as:
1. What is the market size and forecast of the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market?
2. What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 shaping the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market during the forecast period?
3. Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the forecast period in the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market?
4. What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market?
5. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market?
6. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market?
7. What modes and strategic moves are considered suitable for entering the Global In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market?