미국의 상처 및 조직 관리 시장 : 규모, 점유율, 동향 분석(2024-2030년) : MedSuite

Wound and Tissue Management Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis | United States | 2024-2030 | MedSuite | Includes: Wound Closure Market, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, and 11 more

한글목차

2023년 미국 상처 및 조직 관리 시장 규모는 122억 달러에 달했습니다. 이 시장은 3.9%의 연평균 복합 성장률(CAGR)로 확대되고 예측 기간 종료 시에는 159억 달러에 달할 것으로 예측되고 있습니다.

상처 및 조직 관리 분야의 대부분이 성장을 하고 있는 한편, 대체 창상 케어 옵션의 등장에 의해 시장은 과제에 직면하고 있습니다. 기존의 상처 피복재는 선진적인 제품 유형으로 대체되고 있지만, 선진적인 제품 유형이라도, 특정의 상처 유형에 맞춘 새로운 수법이 뛰어난 것도 있습니다.

미국의 상처 및 조직 관리 시장을 독점하고 있는 것은 대기업 3사, Ethicon, 3M, Medtronic입니다. Ethicon은 상처 폐쇄 분야에서 주도적인 역할을 하며 시장 전체의 25% 이상을 차지합니다. 게다가 Ethicon은 수술용 지혈재, 유착방지제, 조직 실란트에서도 강한 존재감을 보이고 있으며, 이러한 분야에서 꾸준한 성장이 기대되고 있습니다.

2위인 3M은 NPWT에서 75% 이상의 압도적인 시장 점유율을 가지고 있으며, 고도의 상처 피복재에서도 큰 점유율을 차지하고 있습니다. 두 분야 모두 CAGR 4-5%의 성장이 예상되고 3M의 발판은 견고한 것으로 되어 있습니다.

Medtronic은 봉합사, 스테이플러, 결찰 클립 등의 상처 폐쇄 제품으로 큰 점유율을 얻고 있으며, 이 시장 부문의 1/4 이상을 차지합니다. 기타 활동은 제한적이며 상처 폐쇄에서 메드트로닉의 지위는 시장의 힘을 보장합니다.

이 보고서는 미국 상처 및 조직 관리 시장에 대해 조사했으며, 시장 개요와 함께 부문별 동향, COVID-19의 영향 분석, 시장 성장 촉진요인 및 억제요인, 경쟁 시장 점유율 분석 및 시장 진출 기업 프로파일 등의 정보를 제공합니다.

목차

주요 요약

조사 방법

미국 상처 및 조직 관리 시장에 대한 COVID-19의 영향

• 소개
• 지역 프로파일
• 시장 부문별 분석

질병 개요

• 기본적인 해부학
• 질병의 치료와 진단
• 환자 인구통계

제품 평가

• 소개
• 제품 포트폴리오
• 규제상의 문제와 리콜
• 임상시험

미국 상처 및 조직 관리 시장 개요

• 소개
• 시장 개요와 트렌드 분석
• 성장 촉진요인과 리미터
• 경쟁 시장 점유율 분석
• 합병과 인수
• 기업 프로파일
  • 3M
  • Baxter
  • Cardinal Health
  • Essity
  • Ethicon
  • Integra Lifesciences
  • Intuitive Surgical
  • Medline
  • Medtronic
  • MiMedx
  • Organogenesis
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Tactile Medical
• SWOT 분석

상처 봉합 시장

전통적인 상처 드레싱 시장

첨단 상처 피복 시장

모이스트 드레싱 시장

항균 드레싱 시장

인터랙티브 드레싱 시장

비접착성 접촉층 시장

수술용 지혈재 시장

조직 실란트 시장

음압상처치료 시장

정적 압박 요법 시장

동적 압축 요법 시장

JHS

영문 목차

영문목차

In 2023, the U.S. wound and tissue management market was valued at $12.2 billion, with expectations for it to grow at a 3.9% CAGR, reaching $15.9 billion by the end of the forecast period. The full report on this market encompasses a wide range of segments, including wound closure, traditional and advanced wound dressings (such as moist, antimicrobial, interactive, and non-adherent contact layers), surgical hemostats, tissue sealants, anti-adhesion products, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), static compression therapy, and dynamic compression therapy.

DATA COVERED IN THE REPORT:

• Unit Sales, Pricing Trends, and Market Growth
• Projections to 2030 and Historical Insights from 2020
• Key Drivers and Restraints by Segment
• Competitive Landscape with Market Share Breakdown
• Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
• Procedure Volumes
• Competitor Profiles, Product Portfolios, and SWOT Analysis for Leading Companies
• Impact of COVID-19

U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET TRENDS:

While most wound and tissue management segments are experiencing growth, the market faces challenges due to the availability of alternative wound care options. Traditional wound dressings are increasingly being replaced by advanced products, although even within the advanced segment, some dressings are outperformed by newer methods tailored to specific wound types

.U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET LEADERS:

Three major companies dominate the U.S. wound and tissue management market: Ethicon, 3M, and Medtronic.

• Ethicon holds the top position, primarily due to its leading role in wound closure, representing over 25% of the total market. Additionally, Ethicon has a strong presence in surgical hemostats, anti-adhesion, and tissue sealants, with steady growth expected in these sectors.
• 3M ranks second, driven by its dominant 75%+ market share in NPWT and significant stake in advanced wound dressings. Both segments are anticipated to grow at a 4-5% CAGR, reinforcing 3M's strong foothold.
• Medtronic secures third place, thanks to its significant share in wound closure products like sutures, staplers, and ligating clips, which account for over a quarter of that market segment. Despite limited activity in other areas, Medtronic's position in wound closure ensures its market strength.

MARKET SEGMENTATION OVERVIEW:

• Wound Closure Market: Includes sutures, staplers, ligating clips, skin closure strips, mesh, and cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesives.
• Traditional Wound Dressings: Comprises gauze, tapes, bandages (excluding compression types), and cotton-based products.
• Advanced Wound Dressings: Covers moist, antimicrobial, interactive dressings, and non-adherent contact layers.
• Moist Dressings: Encompasses foam, transparent films, hydrocolloid, alginate, gelling fiber, and hydrogel dressings.
• Antimicrobial Dressings: Includes both silver-based and non-silver antimicrobial options.
• Interactive Dressings: Biomaterials such as collagen-based products and skin substitutes.
• Non-Adherent Contact Layers: Used in hospital and alternate care settings.
• Surgical Hemostats: Includes thrombin-based, oxidized cellulose, gelatin, collagen, polysaccharide, and combination hemostats.
• Tissue Sealants: Includes fibrin, protein, and synthetic-based tissue sealants.
• Anti-Adhesion: Used for gynecological, abdominal, and other surgeries to prevent adhesion.
• Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT): Includes single-use pumps, conventional NPWT rentals, dressings, and canisters.
• Static Compression Therapy: Consists of compression stockings, AES, compression bandages, and Unna boots.
• Dynamic Compression Therapy: Comprises dynamic DVT prevention sleeves, mobile DVT prevention, and pneumatic compression devices.

RESEARCH SCOPE SUMMARY:

• Regions: United States
• Base Year: 2023
• Forecast Period: 2024-2030
• Historical Data: 2020-2022
• Quantitative Coverage: Market Size, Shares, Forecasts, Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Prices
• Qualitative Coverage: COVID-19 Impact, Market Trends, Limiters, Competitive
• Landscape, SWOT, Mergers & Acquisitions, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies,
• Disease Insights
• Data Sources: Interviews with industry experts, government and regulatory data, hospital statistics, import/export records, and internal iData Research databases.

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE of CONTENTS

List of Figures

List of Charts

executive summary

U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview

Competitive Analysis

Market Trends

Market Developments

Markets Included

Key Report Updates

Version History

research methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Wound and tissue management Market

• 2.1 Introduction
• 2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
  • 2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
  • 2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
  • 2.2.3 Best Case Scenario

Disease Overview

• 3.1 Disease Treatment and Diagnostic
  • 3.1.1 Vascular Malformations
  • 3.1.2 Deep Ven Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
  • 3.1.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
  • 3.1.4 Lymphedema
  • 3.1.5 Surgery
  • 3.1.6 Traumas and Burns
• 3.2 Patient Demographics
  • 3.2.1 Vascular Malformations
  • 3.2.2 Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
  • 3.2.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
  • 3.2.4 Lymphedema
  • 3.2.5 Traumas and Burns

Product Assessment

• 4.1 Introduction
• 4.2 Product Portfolios
  • 4.2.1 Wound Closure Devices
    • 4.2.1.1 Sutures
    • 4.2.1.2 Staplers
    • 4.2.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
    • 4.2.1.4 Wound Closure Strips
    • 4.2.1.5 Tissue Adhesives
  • 4.2.2 Traditional Wound Dressings
  • 4.2.3 Advanced Wound Dressings
  • 4.2.4 Moist Dressings
    • 4.2.4.1.1 Foam Dressings
    • 4.2.4.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
    • 4.2.4.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
    • 4.2.4.1.4 Alginate Dressings
    • 4.2.4.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
    • 4.2.4.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
  • 4.2.5 Antimicrobial Dressings
    • 4.2.5.1.1 Silver Dressing
    • 4.2.5.1.2 Non-Silver Dressing
    • 4.2.5.1.3 Charcoal Dressing
  • 4.2.6 Interactive Dressing
    • 4.2.6.1.1 Bioactive Dressings
    • 4.2.6.1.2 Skin Substitute
  • 4.2.7 Non-Adherent Contact Layer
  • 4.2.8 Surgical Hemostats
    • 4.2.8.1 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
    • 4.2.8.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostats
    • 4.2.8.3 Gelatin-Based Hemostat
    • 4.2.8.4 Collagen-Based Hemostat
    • 4.2.8.5 Combination Hemostat
    • 4.2.8.6 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat
    • 4.2.8.7 First-Responder Hemostat
  • 4.2.9 Tissue Sealants
    • 4.2.9.1 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealants
    • 4.2.9.2 Protein-Based Tissue Sealants
    • 4.2.9.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
  • 4.2.10 Anti-Adhesion
  • 4.2.11 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
  • 4.2.12 Static Compression Therapy
    • 4.2.12.1 Compression Stockings
    • 4.2.12.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
    • 4.2.12.3 Compression Bandages
    • 4.2.12.4 Unna Boots
  • 4.2.13 Dynamic Compression Therapy
    • 4.2.13.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention
    • 4.2.13.2 Mobile DVT Prevention
    • 4.2.13.3 Pneumatic Compression
• 4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
  • 4.3.1 Wound Closure Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.2 Moist Dressing Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.4 Interactive Dressing Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.5 Surgical Hemostat Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.6 Tissue Sealant Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.7 Anti-Adhesion Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.8 Negative Pressure Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.3.9 Static Compression Therapy Market FDA Recalls
• 4.4 Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.1 Wound Closure Devices Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.2 Advanced Wound Dressings Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.3 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.4 Surgical Hemostat Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.5 Tissue Sealant Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.6 Static Compression Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.7 Dynamic Compression Clinical Trials

U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview

• 5.1 Introduction
• 5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
• 5.3 Drivers and Limiters
  • 5.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 5.3.2 Market Limiters
• 5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
• 5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
• 5.6 Company Profiles
  • 5.6.1 3M
  • 5.6.2 Baxter
  • 5.6.3 Cardinal Health
  • 5.6.4 Essity
  • 5.6.5 Ethicon
  • 5.6.6 Integra Lifesciences
  • 5.6.7 Intuitive Surgical
  • 5.6.8 Medline
  • 5.6.9 Medtronic
  • 5.6.10 MiMedx
  • 5.6.11 Organogenesis
  • 5.6.12 Smith & Nephew
  • 5.6.13 Tactile Medical
• 5.7 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.7.1 3M
  • 5.7.2 Baxter
  • 5.7.3 Cardinal Health
  • 5.7.4 Essity
  • 5.7.5 Ethicon
  • 5.7.6 Integra Lifesciences
  • 5.7.7 Intuitive Surgical
  • 5.7.8 Medline
  • 5.7.9 Medtronic
  • 5.7.10 MiMedx
  • 5.7.11 Organogenesis
  • 5.7.12 Smith & Nephew
  • 5.7.13 Tactile Medical

Wound Closure Market

• 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.1.1 Sutures
  • 6.1.2 Staplers
  • 6.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
  • 6.1.4 Skin Closure Strips
  • 6.1.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System
  • 6.1.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure
  • 6.1.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesives
• 6.2 Market Overview
• 6.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 6.3.1 Suture Market
    • 6.3.1.1 Suture Market by Device Type
    • 6.3.1.1.1 Absorbable Suture Market
    • 6.3.1.1.2 Non-Absorbable Suture Market
    • 6.3.1.1.3 Knotless Tissue Closure Market
    • 6.3.1.2 Suture Market by Infection Control Type
    • 6.3.1.2.1 Antibacterial Suture Market
    • 6.3.1.2.2 Standard Suture Market
    • 6.3.1.3 Suture Market by Care Setting
    • 6.3.1.3.1 Hospital Suture Market
    • 6.3.1.3.2 Alternate Care Suture Market
  • 6.3.2 Stapler Market
    • 6.3.2.1 Stapler Market by Device Type
    • 6.3.2.1.1 Open Surgery Stapler Market
    • 6.3.2.1.2 Laparoscopic Stapler Market
    • 6.3.2.1.3 Skin Stapler Market
    • 6.3.2.2 Stapler Market by Care Setting
    • 6.3.2.2.1 Hospital Stapler Market
    • 6.3.2.2.2 Alternate Care Stapler Market
  • 6.3.3 Ligation Clip Applier Market
    • 6.3.3.1 Ligating Clip Applier Market by Device Type
    • 6.3.3.1.1 Open Surgery Ligation Market
    • 6.3.3.1.2 Laparoscopic Ligation Market
    • 6.3.3.2 Ligation Market by Care Setting
    • 6.3.3.2.1 Hospital Ligation Market
    • 6.3.3.2.2 Alternate Care Ligation Market
  • 6.3.4 Skin Closure Strip Market
    • 6.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Closure Strip Market
    • 6.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Closure Strip Market
  • 6.3.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System Market
  • 6.3.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure Market
  • 6.3.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
    • 6.3.7.1 Hospital Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
    • 6.3.7.2 Alternate Care Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
• 6.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 6.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 6.4.2 Market Limiters
• 6.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Traditional Wound Dressing Market

• 7.1 Introduction
• 7.2 Market Overview
• 7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 7.3.1 Traditional Wound Dressing Market
  • 7.3.2 Gauze Market
    • 7.3.2.1 Hospital Gauze Market
    • 7.3.2.2 Alternate Care Gauze Market
  • 7.3.3 Tape Market
    • 7.3.3.1 Hospital Tape Market
    • 7.3.3.2 Alternate Care Tape Market
  • 7.3.4 Bandage Market
    • 7.3.4.1 Hospital Bandage Market
    • 7.3.4.2 Alternate Care Bandage Market
  • 7.3.5 Cotton Market
    • 7.3.5.1 Hospital Cotton Market
    • 7.3.5.2 Alternate Care Cotton Market
• 7.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 7.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 7.4.2 Market Limiters
• 7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Advanced wound dressing Market

• 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.1.1 Moist Advanced Dressings
  • 8.1.2 Antimicrobial Advanced Dressings
  • 8.1.3 Interactive Advanced Dressings
  • 8.1.4 Non-Adherent Contact Layers
• 8.2 Market Overview
• 8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 8.3.1 Advanced Wound Dressing Market
  • 8.3.2 Moist Dressing Market
  • 8.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
  • 8.3.4 Interactive Advanced Dressing Market
  • 8.3.5 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
• 8.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 8.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 8.4.2 Market Limiters
• 8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Moist dressing Market

• 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.1.1 Foam Dressings
  • 9.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
  • 9.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
  • 9.1.4 Alginate Dressings
  • 9.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
  • 9.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
• 9.2 Market Overview
  • 9.2.1 Moist Dressing Market by Segment
• 9.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 9.3.1 Moist Dressing Market
  • 9.3.2 Foam Dressing Market
  • 9.3.3 Transparent Film Dressing Market
  • 9.3.4 Hydrocolloid Dressing Market
  • 9.3.5 Alginate Dressing Market
  • 9.3.6 Gelling Fiber Dressing Market
  • 9.3.7 Hydrogel Dressing Market
  • 9.3.8 Moist Dressing Market by Care Setting
    • 9.3.8.1 Hospital Moist Dressing Market
    • 9.3.8.2 Alternate Care Moist Dressing Market
• 9.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 9.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 9.4.2 Market Limiters
• 9.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Antimicrobial dressing Market

• 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.1.1 Silver Dressings
  • 10.1.2 Non-Silver Dressings
• 10.2 Market Overview
  • 10.2.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment
• 10.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 10.3.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
  • 10.3.2 Silver Dressing Market
  • 10.3.3 Non-Silver Dressing Market
  • 10.3.4 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Care Setting
    • 10.3.4.1 Hospital Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 10.3.4.2 Alternate Care Antimicrobial Dressing Market
• 10.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 10.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 10.4.2 Market Limiters
• 10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Interactive dressing Market

• 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.1.1 Biomaterials
  • 11.1.2 Skin Substitutes
• 11.2 Market Overview
• 11.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 11.3.1 Interactive Dressing Market
  • 11.3.2 Collagen Dressing Market
  • 11.3.3 Skin Substitute Market
    • 11.3.3.1 Particulate Skin Substitute Market
    • 11.3.3.2 Sheet Skin Substitute Market
    • 11.3.3.3 Other Skin Substitute Market
    • 11.3.3.4 Skin Substitute Market by Care Setting
    • 11.3.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Substitute Market
    • 11.3.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Substitute Market
• 11.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 11.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 11.4.2 Market Limiters
• 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Non-Adherent Contact layer Market

• 12.1 Introduction
• 12.2 Market Overview
• 12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 12.3.1 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
  • 12.3.2 Hospital Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
  • 12.3.3 Alternate Care Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
• 12.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 12.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 12.4.2 Market Limiters
• 12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Surgical Hemostat Market

• 13.1 Introduction
  • 13.1.1 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostats
  • 13.1.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose-Based Hemostats
  • 13.1.3 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
  • 13.1.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostats
  • 13.1.5 Collagen-Based Hemostats
  • 13.1.6 Combination Hemostats
  • 13.1.7 First Responder Hemostats
• 13.2 Market Overview
• 13.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 13.3.1 Surgical Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.2 Thrombin-Based Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.3 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.5 Collagen-Based Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.6 Combination Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.7 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat Market
  • 13.3.8 First Responder Hemostat Market
• 13.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 13.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 13.4.2 Market Limiters
• 13.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Tissue sealant Market

• 14.1 Introduction
  • 14.1.1 Fibrin Sealants
  • 14.1.2 Protein-Based Sealants
  • 14.1.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
• 14.2 Market Overview
• 14.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 14.3.1 Tissue Sealant Market
  • 14.3.2 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealant Market
  • 14.3.3 Protein-Based Tissue Sealant Market
  • 14.3.4 Synthetic Tissue Sealant Market
• 14.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 14.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 14.4.2 Market Limiters
• 14.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Anti-Adhesion Market

• 15.1 Introduction
• 15.2 Market Overview
• 15.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 15.3.1 Anti-Adhesion Market
  • 15.3.2 Gynecological Procedure Market
  • 15.3.3 Abdominal Procedure Market
  • 15.3.4 Other Procedures Market
• 15.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 15.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 15.4.2 Market Limiters
• 15.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market

• 16.1 Introduction
• 16.2 Market Overview
• 16.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 16.3.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market
  • 16.3.2 Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
    • 16.3.2.1 Hospital Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
    • 16.3.2.2 Alternate Care Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
  • 16.3.3 Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
    • 16.3.3.1 Hospital Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
    • 16.3.3.2 Alternate Care Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
  • 16.3.4 NPWT Dressing Market
    • 16.3.4.1 Hospital NPWT Dressing Market
    • 16.3.4.2 Alternate Care NPWT Dressing Market
  • 16.3.5 NPWT Canister Market
    • 16.3.5.1 Hospital NPWT Canister Market
    • 16.3.5.2 Alternate Care NPWT Canister Market
• 16.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 16.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 16.4.2 Market Limiters
• 16.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Static Compression therapy Market

• 17.1 Introduction
  • 17.1.1 Graduated Compression Stockings
  • 17.1.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
  • 17.1.3 Compression Bandages
  • 17.1.4 Unna Boot
• 17.2 Market Overview
• 17.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 17.3.1 Static Compression Therapy Market
  • 17.3.2 Graduated Compression Stocking Market
    • 17.3.2.1 OTC Graduated Compression Stocking Market
    • 17.3.2.2 Medical-Grade Graduated Compression Stocking Market
  • 17.3.3 Anti-Embolism Stocking Market
  • 17.3.4 Compression Bandage Market
    • 17.3.4.1 Compression Kit Market
    • 17.3.4.2 Adhesive Bandage Market
    • 17.3.4.3 Cohesive Bandage Market
  • 17.3.5 Unna Boot Market
• 17.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 17.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 17.4.2 Market Limiters
• 17.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Dynamic Compression Therapy Market

• 18.1 Introduction
  • 18.1.1 Dynamic Deep Vein Thrombosis Prevention
  • 18.1.2 Mobile Deep Vein Thrombosis Compression
  • 18.1.3 Pneumatic Compression
• 18.2 Market Overview
• 18.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 18.3.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention Device Market
  • 18.3.2 Mobile DVT Prevention Device Market
  • 18.3.3 Pneumatic Compression Device Market
    • 18.3.3.1 Sequential Compression Device Market
    • 18.3.3.1.1 Sequential Compression Pump Market
    • 18.3.3.1.2 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
    • 18.3.3.1.3 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market Unit Analysis
    • 18.3.3.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Device Market
    • 18.3.3.2.1 Calibrated Sequential Compression Pump Market
    • 18.3.3.2.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
• 18.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 18.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 18.4.2 Market Limiters
• 18.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

관련자료