¼¼°èÀÇ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå
Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software
»óǰÄÚµå : 1798827
¸®¼­Ä¡»ç : Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2025³â 08¿ù
ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸ : ¿µ¹® 269 Pages
 ¶óÀ̼±½º & °¡°Ý (ºÎ°¡¼¼ º°µµ)
US $ 5,850 £Ü 8,209,000
PDF & Excel (Single User License) help
PDF & Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ 1¸í¸¸ ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÆÄÀÏ ³» ÅØ½ºÆ®ÀÇ º¹»ç ¹× ºÙ¿©³Ö±â´Â °¡´ÉÇÏÁö¸¸, Ç¥/±×·¡ÇÁ µîÀº º¹»çÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â 1ȸ °¡´ÉÇϸç, Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§´Â ÆÄÀÏ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
US $ 17,550 £Ü 24,629,000
PDF & Excel (Global License to Company and its Fully-owned Subsidiaries) help
PDF & Excel º¸°í¼­¸¦ µ¿ÀÏ ±â¾÷ ¹× 100% ÀÚȸ»çÀÇ ¸ðµç ºÐÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¶óÀ̼±½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àμâ´Â 1Àδç 1ȸ °¡´ÉÇϸç, Àμ⹰ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§´Â ÆÄÀÏ ÀÌ¿ë¹üÀ§¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


Çѱ۸ñÂ÷

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 27¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ Àü¸Á

2024³â¿¡ 16¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ´Â Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¼¼°è ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³âºÎÅÍ 2030³â±îÁö CAGR 8.7%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 27¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ºÎ¹® Áß ÇϳªÀÎ ÆÛºí¸¯ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå´Â CAGR 10.3%¸¦ ±â·ÏÇÏ¸ç ºÐ¼® ±â°£ Á¾·á±îÁö 17¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ÇÁ¶óÀ̺ø Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¼ºÀå·üÀº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGR 6.1%·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ ½ÃÀåÀº ÃßÁ¤ 4¾ï 4,340¸¸ ´Þ·¯, Áß±¹Àº CAGR 13.8%·Î ¼ºÀå ¿¹Ãø

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 4¾ï 4,340¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è 2À§ °æÁ¦ ´ë±¹ÀÎ Áß±¹Àº ºÐ¼® ±â°£ÀÎ 2024-2030³â CAGR 13.8%·Î 2030³â±îÁö 5¾ï 9,470¸¸ ´Þ·¯ÀÇ ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Áö¿ªº° ½ÃÀåÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϺ»°ú ij³ª´Ù°¡ ÀÖ°í, ºÐ¼® ±â°£ µ¿¾È CAGRÀº °¢°¢ 4.3%¿Í 8.4%·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù. À¯·´¿¡¼­´Â µ¶ÀÏÀÌ CAGR 5.8%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀå - ÁÖ¿ä µ¿Çâ°ú ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Á¤¸®

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î°¡ ±â¾÷ÀÇ IT ¿î¿µÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È­½Ãų±î?

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î´Â ºñÁî´Ï½º ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¿öÅ©Ç÷οì, ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ÇÇàÀ» ÀÚµ¿È­Çϰí ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀ̰í Áö´ÉÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦°øÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷ IT ¿î¿µ Çö´ëÈ­ÀÇ Áß½ÉÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºü¸£°Ô ¼ºÀåÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±âÁ¸¿¡´Â ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀÌ ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º ȯ°æ¿¡ ±¹ÇÑµÇ¾î ½Ã°£ ±â¹Ý ÀÛ¾÷ Æ®¸®°Å¿¡ ±¹ÇÑµÇ¾î ¼öÀÛ¾÷À¸·Î ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇÏ°í ¸¹Àº ÀÎÇÁ¶ó À¯Áöº¸¼ö°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Ò½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³¿Í ºÐ»ê ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ ºÎ»óÀ¸·Î ¿öÅ©·Îµå ÀÚµ¿È­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù ¹ÎøÇϰí È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÑ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀº ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¹× ¸ÖƼ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ º¹ÀâÇÑ ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο츦 ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹À̼ÇÇÏ¿© ±â¾÷ÀÌ ´ÜÀÏ ÅëÇÕ ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º ³»¿¡¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ À̵¿, ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¹èÆ÷, ÀÎÇÁ¶ó È®ÀåÀ» ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ÅëÇÕÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÅëÇÕµÈ ´ÜÀÏ ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º ³»¿¡¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ À̵¿, ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¹èÆ÷, ÀÎÇÁ¶ó È®ÀåÀ» ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ÅëÇÕÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­¸¦ ÅëÇØ IT ÆÀÀº ¸®¼Ò½º È¿À²¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃŰ¸é¼­ º¯µ¿ÇÏ´Â ¿öÅ©·Îµå¸¦ ó¸®Çϰí, ´Ù¿îŸÀÓÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­Çϸç, Àü ¼¼°è ¿î¿µ¿¡¼­ ÀϰüµÈ ¼º´ÉÀ» º¸ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¾÷Àº ÀÌÁ¦ À繫 Àϰý ó¸®, ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ ½Ç½Ã°£ ºÐ¼®, AI ¹× ¸Ó½Å·¯´× ¸ðµ¨ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý µî ºÎ¼­ °£ »óÈ£ ÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀÎ ¾÷¹«¸¦ ÀÚµ¿È­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, À̺¥Æ®³ª API È£Ãâ, ½Ã½ºÅÛ »óȲ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÛ¾÷À» Æ®¸®°ÅÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â À¯¿¬¼ºÀ» ÅëÇØ ¿î¿µÀÇ ÀÀ´ä¼ºÀ» ³ô¿´½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀº E-Commerce, ÇコÄɾî, ¹ðÅ· µî °¡µ¿½Ã°£°ú Á¤È®¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ »ê¾÷¿¡¼­ Àå¾Ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»¼º°ú ºñÁî´Ï½º ¿¬¼Ó¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ µµ±¸·Î ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹°¸®Àû ÀÎÇÁ¶óÀÇ Á¦¾à ¾øÀÌ ¿öÅ©·Îµå ¼ö¿ä¿¡ µû¶ó Áï°¢ÀûÀ¸·Î È®ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´É·ÂÀº ¿À´Ã³¯ÀÇ ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤ÇÏ°í µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Áý¾àÀûÀΠȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀÔÁõµÆ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¸ðµ¨Àº Áß¾Ó ÁýÁᫎ °¡½Ã¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇϹǷΠIT °ü¸®ÀÚ´Â »ç¿ëÇϱ⠽¬¿î ´ë½Ãº¸µå¿Í ¾Ë¸²À» ÅëÇØ ¼º´É ÁöÇ¥, °¨»ç ·Î±×, ÀÛ¾÷ Á¾¼Ó¼ºÀ» ÃßÀûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±â¾÷ÀÌ ±âÁ¸ ¼Ö·ç¼Çº¸´Ù Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ÅøÀ» ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¹«¾ùÀϱî?

½Ç½Ã°£ ºñÁî´Ï½º ¿î¿µ, µ¥ºê¿É½º(DevOps) °üÇà, Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ µô¸®¹ö¸® ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀÎÀÇ ¿ä±¸»çÇ׿¡ ºÎÇÕÇϱâ À§ÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ Á¶Á÷µéÀÌ ·¹°Å½Ã ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ÅøÀ» Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î·Î ´ëüÇÏ´Â »ç·Ê°¡ ´Ã°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±âÁ¸ ¿öÅ©·Îµå ÀÚµ¿È­ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº È®À强ÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö°í, API ÅëÇÕÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇϸç, ¼öÀÛ¾÷À¸·Î ¼³Á¤ ¹× À¯Áöº¸¼ö°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇØ Áö¿¬ ¹× ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ë Áõ°¡¸¦ ÃÊ·¡Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀº ¿Âµð¸Çµå È®À强À» Á¦°øÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ±â¾÷Àº Çϵå¿þ¾î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãß°¡ ÅõÀÚ³ª ¼­ºñ½º Áß´Ü ¾øÀÌ ¿öÅ©·ÎµåÀÇ ±Þ°ÝÇÑ Áõ°¡¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÆÛºí¸¯ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå, ÇÁ¶óÀ̺ø µ¥ÀÌÅͼ¾ÅÍ, ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈ­µÈ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó µî À̱âÁ¾ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ÀÛ¾÷À» ½ÇÇàÇÒ ¼ö Àִ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ·¯´Â Çö´ëÀÇ µðÁöÅÐ »ýŰ迡 ÀûÇÕÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, µ¿Àû ¸®¼Ò½º ÇÁ·ÎºñÀú´×, ¿À·ù º¹±¸ ÀÚµ¿È­, ·Îµå ¹ë·±½Ì, Å©·Î½º Ç÷§Æû ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹ÀÌ¼Ç µî ·¹°Å½Ã ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡´Â ¾ø´Â °í±Þ ±â´ÉÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ ÁÖ¿ä ÀåÁ¡Àº CI/CD µµ±¸, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¼­ºñ½º, Ÿ»ç API¿ÍÀÇ ±ä¹ÐÇÑ ÅëÇÕÀ¸·Î °³¹ßÀÚ¿Í IT ¿î¿µÆÀÀÌ ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑÀÇ ¸¶Âû·Î ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¸±¸®½º, µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽º ¸¶À̱׷¹À̼Ç, ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¶Á¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. IaC(Infrastructure as Code)ÀÇ ºÎ»óÀ¸·Î Terraform, Ansible, Kubernetes¿Í °°Àº Åø°ú ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ¿¬µ¿µÇ´Â ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ´õ¿í Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ±â¾÷µéÀº Á÷°üÀûÀÎ ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º, ¿ªÇÒ ±â¹Ý Á¢±Ù Á¦¾î, »ç¿ëÀÚ Á¤ÀÇ °¡´ÉÇÑ ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο츦 ÅëÇØ Çù¾÷ÀûÀÎ ¿öÅ©·Îµå °ü¸®¸¦ °¡´ÉÇϰÔÇÔÀ¸·Î½á °³¹ß, ¿î¿µ, »ç¾÷ºÎ °£ÀÇ Ä­¸·À̸¦ Çã¹°°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºñ¿ë Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý °¡°Ý ¸ðµ¨Àº Ãʱâ ÅõÀÚ ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨ÇÏ´Â µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¿¹Ãø °¡´ÉÇÑ ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ëÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °æÁ¦Àû, ±â´ÉÀû ÀÌÁ¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ±â¾÷µéÀº Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ½ºÄÉÁÙ·¯¸¦ º¸Á¶ÀûÀÎ µµ±¸°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ µðÁöÅÐ Àüȯ Àü·«ÀÇ ±âº» ¿ä¼Ò·Î äÅÃÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ ÁøÈ­¸¦ À̲ô´Â ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀº ¹«¾ùÀϱî?

±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îÀÇ ±â´ÉÀÌ Å©°Ô Çâ»óµÇ¾î ´Ù¾çÇÑ IT ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù Áö´ÉÀûÀ̰í ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ ÀûÀÀÇü ¿öÅ©·Îµå °ü¸®°¡ °¡´ÉÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. °¡Àå Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ±â¼ú Çõ½Å Áß Çϳª´Â ÀΰøÁö´É°ú ¸Ó½Å·¯´× ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀÇ µµÀÔÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀº °ú°Å ÀÛ¾÷ ¼º´ÉÀ» ºÐ¼®Çϰí, ¿öÅ©·Îµå ÃßÀ̸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ¿© ÃÖÀûÀÇ ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ÆÐÅÏÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿¹Ãø ±â´ÉÀº ±â¾÷ÀÌ ÀÚ¿øÀ» ¼±Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÒ´çÇϰí, ó¸® Áö¿¬À» ¹æÁöÇϸç, ¼ö¿ä ÇÇÅ© ½Ã ½Ã½ºÅÛ È¿À²À» °³¼±ÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ Å« Çõ½ÅÀº À̺¥Æ® ±â¹Ý ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ´Â Á¤ÀûÀÎ ½Ã°£ ±â¹Ý Æ®¸®°Å¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ÆÄÀÏ µµÂø, ¼¾¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ, API È£Ãâ, ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¾Ë¸² µî ½Ç½Ã°£ Á¶°Ç¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÛ¾÷À» Æ®¸®°ÅÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀº ¿öÅ©·Îµå ÆÐÅÏÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÌ°í ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â ¾ÖÀÚÀÏ È¯°æ¿¡¼­ ƯÈ÷ À¯¿ëÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ·¯µµ ¸ðµâÈ­µÇ¾î ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈ­µÈ ½ÇÇà ȯ°æ°ú ¼­¹ö¸®½º ±â´ÉÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ¿© °¡º±°í, ºü¸£°í, ¸®¼Ò½º È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ÀÛ¾÷ ½ÇÇàÀÌ °¡´ÉÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. »óÈ£¿î¿ë¼ºÀº ºñ¾àÀûÀ¸·Î Çâ»óµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÃֽŠÇ÷§ÆûÀº AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, Azure Logic Apps, Snowflake ¹× BigQuery¿Í °°Àº µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¿þ¾îÇϿ콺 µµ±¸ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ¼­ºñ½º¿Í Ç÷¯±× ¾Ø Ç÷¹ÀÌ·Î ÅëÇÕÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. º¸¾È ¹× ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠±â´Éµµ ¹ßÀüÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °­È­µÈ ¾Ïȣȭ Ç¥ÁØ, Á¤Ã¥ ±â¹Ý ¾×¼¼½º Á¦¾î, °¨»ç ·Î±× ±â´ÉÀÌ ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ¿£ÅÍÇÁ¶óÀÌÁî±Þ Ç÷§Æû¿¡ ³»ÀåµÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¸¹Àº º¥´õµéÀÌ ¼¿ÇÁ¼­ºñ½º Æ÷Åаú ·Î¿ìÄÚµå ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ºñÁî´Ï½º »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ IT ºÎ¼­¿¡ °úµµÇÏ°Ô ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°íµµ ¿öÅ©·Îµå¸¦ Á¤ÀÇ, ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ¹× °ü¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀÇ ¹ÎÁÖÈ­·Î ÀÎÇØ IT ÇÙ½É ÆÀ¿¡¼­ ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ, À繫, ¿î¿µ ºÎ¼­±îÁö Á¶Á÷ ³» Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ È°¿ë ¹üÀ§°¡ È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼úÀû º¯È­´Â ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µÀ» ¹é±×¶ó¿îµå IT ±â´ÉÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ Àü·«Àû ±â¾÷ Àü¹ÝÀÇ ±â´ÉÀ¸·Î ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îÀÇ µµÀÔÀÌ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¹«¾ùÀϱî?

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀº ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷ ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³, Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¾ç, º¯È­ÇÏ´Â Àη ¿ªÇÐ, ÀÚµ¿È­ ÃßÁø°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¿©·¯ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁÖµµµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ù°, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ º¸±Þ°ú ÇÏÀ̺긮µå IT ȯ°æÀÇ È®»êÀ¸·Î ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¸ð³î¸®½Ä ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Åø·Î´Â ÃæºÐÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Æ È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÑ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µÑ°, ¸ðµç ºÎ¼­¿¡¼­ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹Ý ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÁ¸µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ´õ¿í º¹ÀâÇÏ°í »óÈ£ ÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀÎ ¿öÅ©Ç÷ο찡 »ý¼ºµÇ¾î Á¤È®ÇÑ ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹À̼ǰú °í°¡¿ë¼ºÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼Â°, µðÁöÅÐ Ç÷§Æû°ú ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹«´Â 24/7 ¼¼°è ¿î¿µÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¿öÅ©·ÎµåÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ½ÇÇàÀº »çġǰÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ÇʼöǰÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ³Ý°, DevOps¿Í ¾ÖÀÚÀÏ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ ºÎ»óÀ¸·Î ÄÚµå ¸®Æ÷ÁöÅ丮, ¹èÆ÷ ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀÎ, °üÃø°¡´É¼º µµ±¸¿Í ÅëÇÕÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ API Áß½ÉÀÇ ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çʿ伺ÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ´Ù¼¸Â°, Á¶Á÷Àº ¿î¿µ È¿À²¼º Çâ»ó, ÀÎÀû ¿À·ù °¨¼Ò, ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º ¼öÁØ °è¾à¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½º¸¶Æ® ÀÚµ¿È­ Ç÷§Æû¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â »óȲ¿¡ Á÷¸éÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿©¼¸Â°, ±ÝÀ¶, ÀÇ·á, Á¦Á¶ µî °¢ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö°¡ ¸ðµç ÀÛ¾÷À» ÃßÀûÇÏ°í »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼öÁØÀÇ ±ÇÇÑÀ» °­Á¦ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °¨»ç °¡´ÉÇÏ°í ¾ÈÀüÇÑ ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ »ç¿ëÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àϰö°, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀÌ ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý ¹× ¼Òºñ ÁÖµµÇü °¡°Ý ¸ðµ¨À» »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ´ë±â¾÷»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Áß°ß±â¾÷°ú ½ºÅ¸Æ®¾÷µµ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» ½±°Ô ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¿©´ü°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ´Â ½Ç½Ã°£ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ, Á÷°üÀûÀÎ ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º, ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ´ë½Ãº¸µå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ¾×¼¼½º¸¦ Á¡Á¡ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ¿ä±¸Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °ø±Þ¾÷ü´Â »ç¿ëÀÚ °æÇè°ú ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º µðÀÚÀÎ Çõ½ÅÀ» À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, AI, IoT, ¿§Áö ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ µî ±â¼úÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ¿öÅ©·Îµå ÀÚµ¿È­ÀÇ ¹üÀ§°¡ È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±â¾÷Àº µðÁöÅÐ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í ÇÔ²² ÁøÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Ç÷§ÆûÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇʼöÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÃËÁø¿äÀεéÀÌ »ê¾÷°ú Áö¿ªÀ» ºÒ¹®Çϰí Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¿öÅ©·Îµå ½ºÄÉÁÙ¸µ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÀåÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÌ°í ºü¸¥ ¼ºÀåÀ» °ßÀÎÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ºÎ¹®

Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå(ÆÛºí¸¯ Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå, ÇÁ¶óÀ̺ø Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå, ÇÏÀ̺긮µå Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå), ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ(±â¾÷ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, Á¤ºÎ±â°ü ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ, ±âŸ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ)

Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ±â¾÷ »ç·Ê

AI ÅëÇÕ

Global Industry Analysts´Â °ËÁõµÈ Àü¹®°¡ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷¿Í AI ÅøÀ» ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀå Á¤º¸¿Í °æÀï Á¤º¸¸¦ Çõ½ÅÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Global Industry Analysts´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ LLM ¹× ¾÷°è °íÀ¯ÀÇ SLM Äõ¸®¸¦ µû¸£´Â ´ë½Å ºñµð¿À ±â·Ï, ºí·Î±×, °Ë»ö ¿£Áø Á¶»ç, ¹æ´ëÇÑ ¾çÀÇ ±â¾÷, Á¦Ç°/¼­ºñ½º, ½ÃÀå µ¥ÀÌÅÍ µî ¼¼°è Àü¹®°¡·ÎºÎÅÍ ¼öÁýÇÑ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ¸®Æ÷ÁöÅ丮¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

°ü¼¼ ¿µÇâ °è¼ö

Global Industry Analysts´Â º»»ç ¼ÒÀçÁö, Á¦Á¶°ÅÁ¡, ¼öÃâÀÔ(¿ÏÁ¦Ç° ¹× OEM)À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æÀï·Â º¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¹ÀâÇÏ°í ´Ù¸éÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ¸ÅÃâ¿ø°¡(COGS) Áõ°¡, ¼öÀͼº Ç϶ô, °ø±Þ¸Á ÀçÆí µî ¹Ì½ÃÀû, °Å½ÃÀû ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ Áß¿¡¼­µµ ƯÈ÷ °æÀï»çµé¿¡°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦2Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦3Àå ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå °æÀï

KSM
¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷

¿µ¹®¸ñÂ÷

Global Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software Market to Reach US$2.7 Billion by 2030

The global market for Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software estimated at US$1.6 Billion in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$2.7 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 8.7% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Public Cloud, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 10.3% CAGR and reach US$1.7 Billion by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Private Cloud segment is estimated at 6.1% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$443.4 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 13.8% CAGR

The Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software market in the U.S. is estimated at US$443.4 Million in the year 2024. China, the world's second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$594.7 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 13.8% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 4.3% and 8.4% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 5.8% CAGR.

Global Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software Market - Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

How Is Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software Changing Enterprise IT Operations?

Cloud-based workload scheduling software is rapidly becoming a central force in modernizing enterprise IT operations, offering organizations a dynamic and intelligent way to automate and optimize the execution of business processes, data workflows, and application workloads. Traditionally, workload scheduling was confined to on-premises environments and limited to time-based job triggers, often requiring manual oversight and significant infrastructure maintenance. However, the rise of cloud-native architectures and distributed computing has demanded a more agile and scalable approach to workload automation. Cloud-based scheduling platforms offer real-time orchestration of complex workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments, enabling businesses to seamlessly integrate data movement, application deployment, and infrastructure scaling within a single unified interface. This shift has empowered IT teams to handle fluctuating workloads with improved resource efficiency, minimize downtime, and ensure consistent performance across global operations. Enterprises are now able to automate interdependent jobs across departments, whether they involve batch processing in finance, real-time analytics in marketing, or data ingestion for AI and machine learning models. The flexibility to trigger jobs based on events, API calls, or system conditions is also enhancing operational responsiveness. In industries like e-commerce, healthcare, and banking, where uptime and precision are paramount, cloud-based scheduling platforms are emerging as essential tools for achieving resilience and business continuity. Their ability to scale instantly based on workload demand, without physical infrastructure constraints, is proving critical in today's volatile and data-intensive environments. The cloud model also enables centralized visibility, allowing IT administrators to track performance metrics, audit logs, and job dependencies through user-friendly dashboards and alerts.

Why Are Organizations Prioritizing Cloud Scheduling Tools Over Traditional Solutions?

Organizations across sectors are increasingly replacing legacy scheduling tools with cloud-based workload scheduling software to better align with the demands of real-time business operations, DevOps practices, and continuous delivery pipelines. Traditional workload automation systems often struggle with scalability, lack API integrations, and require significant manual configuration and maintenance, resulting in delays and higher operational costs. In contrast, cloud-based scheduling platforms provide on-demand scalability, allowing enterprises to adapt to workload surges without additional hardware investments or service interruptions. The ability to run jobs across heterogeneous environments, including public clouds, private data centers, and containerized infrastructure, makes cloud schedulers uniquely suited for modern digital ecosystems. Furthermore, they offer advanced features such as dynamic resource provisioning, error recovery automation, load balancing, and cross-platform orchestration that legacy systems cannot match. Another key advantage lies in their tight integration with CI/CD tools, cloud services, and third-party APIs, which allows developers and IT operations teams to coordinate application releases, database migrations, and system updates with minimal friction. The rise of infrastructure as code (IaC) has further amplified the demand for scheduling solutions that can work seamlessly with tools like Terraform, Ansible, and Kubernetes. Enterprises are also seeking to break down silos between development, operations, and business units by enabling collaborative workload management through intuitive interfaces, role-based access control, and customizable workflows. From a cost perspective, the subscription-based pricing models of cloud scheduling platforms reduce upfront capital expenditure while providing predictable operational costs. These economic and functional advantages are prompting organizations to adopt cloud-based schedulers not as ancillary tools, but as foundational elements of digital transformation strategies.

What Technological Innovations Are Powering the Evolution of Cloud Scheduling Platforms?

Technological advancements are significantly elevating the capabilities of cloud-based workload scheduling software, enabling more intelligent, automated, and adaptive workload management across diverse IT environments. One of the most transformative innovations is the incorporation of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms that can analyze historical job performance, forecast workload trends, and suggest optimal scheduling patterns. These predictive capabilities help organizations preemptively allocate resources, avoid processing delays, and improve system efficiency during peak demand periods. Another major innovation is event-driven scheduling, which allows jobs to be triggered by real-time conditions such as file arrivals, sensor data, API calls, or system alerts rather than relying on static time-based triggers. This approach is particularly valuable in agile environments where workload patterns are highly dynamic and unpredictable. Cloud schedulers are also becoming more modular, with support for containerized execution environments and serverless functions, enabling lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient job executions. Interoperability has improved drastically, with modern platforms offering plug-and-play integrations with a wide array of cloud services including AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, Azure Logic Apps, and data warehousing tools like Snowflake and BigQuery. Security and compliance features are also advancing, with enhanced encryption standards, policy-based access controls, and audit logging functionalities being built into most enterprise-grade platforms. Additionally, many vendors are introducing self-service portals and low-code interfaces that allow business users to define, monitor, and manage workloads without relying heavily on IT departments. This democratization of workload scheduling is expanding the reach of these platforms within organizations, from core IT teams to marketing, finance, and operations departments. These technological shifts are collectively redefining workload scheduling as a strategic, enterprise-wide capability rather than a background IT function.

What Factors Are Driving the Accelerated Adoption of Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software Globally?

The growth in the cloud-based workload scheduling software market is driven by several factors related to evolving enterprise architectures, rising data volumes, changing workforce dynamics, and the push for automation. First, the widespread adoption of cloud computing and the proliferation of hybrid IT environments have made traditional, monolithic scheduling tools inadequate, creating demand for scalable, cloud-native solutions. Second, the increasing reliance on data-driven processes across every department is generating more complex and interdependent workflows that require precise orchestration and high availability. Third, the shift toward 24/7 global operations, fueled by digital platforms and remote workforces, is making continuous workload execution a necessity rather than a luxury. Fourth, the rise of DevOps and Agile methodologies is driving the need for automated, API-centric scheduling systems that can integrate with code repositories, deployment pipelines, and observability tools. Fifth, organizations are under growing pressure to improve operational efficiency, reduce human error, and meet tight service-level agreements, prompting investment in smart automation platforms. Sixth, regulatory compliance across sectors such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing is encouraging the use of auditable, secure scheduling solutions that can track every action and enforce user-level permissions. Seventh, the availability of subscription-based and consumption-driven pricing models is making cloud scheduling platforms accessible to mid-sized enterprises and startups, not just large corporations. Eighth, end users are increasingly demanding real-time monitoring, intuitive interfaces, and mobile access to scheduling dashboards, pushing vendors to innovate around user experience and interface design. Finally, the rapid evolution of technologies such as AI, IoT, and edge computing is expanding the scope of workload automation, making it essential for enterprises to adopt platforms that can evolve alongside their digital infrastructure. These diverse drivers are collectively fueling the sustained and rapid expansion of the cloud-based workload scheduling software market across industries and geographies.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Cloud-based Workload Scheduling Software market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:

Cloud (Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Hybrid Cloud); End-User (Corporate End-User, Government End-User, Other End-Users)

Geographic Regions/Countries:

World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; Spain; Russia; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific (Australia; India; South Korea; and Rest of Asia-Pacific); Latin America (Argentina; Brazil; Mexico; and Rest of Latin America); Middle East (Iran; Israel; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; and Rest of Middle East); and Africa.

Select Competitors (Total 32 Featured) -

AI INTEGRATIONS

We're transforming market and competitive intelligence with validated expert content and AI tools.

Instead of following the general norm of querying LLMs and Industry-specific SLMs, we built repositories of content curated from domain experts worldwide including video transcripts, blogs, search engines research, and massive amounts of enterprise, product/service, and market data.

TARIFF IMPACT FACTOR

Our new release incorporates impact of tariffs on geographical markets as we predict a shift in competitiveness of companies based on HQ country, manufacturing base, exports and imports (finished goods and OEM). This intricate and multifaceted market reality will impact competitors by increasing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), reducing profitability, reconfiguring supply chains, amongst other micro and macro market dynamics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

IV. COMPETITION

(ÁÖ)±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀÌ¼Ç 02-2025-2992 kr-info@giikorea.co.kr
¨Ï Copyright Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
PC¹öÀü º¸±â