쌀 생산은 전 세계 수백만 명, 특히 쌀을 주식으로 하는 아시아 사람들의 식량 안보와 경제생활의 초석이 되고 있습니다.
그러나 전통적인 벼농사는 온실가스(GHG), 특히 메탄(CH2)과 아산화질소(N2O) 배출에 크게 기여하고 있습니다. 세계 인구가 증가하고 2050년까지 34% 증가할 것으로 예상되는 가운데, 환경에 미치는 영향을 최소화하면서 수요를 충족시킬 수 있는 쌀 생산에 대한 압박은 점점 더 커지고 있습니다.
최근 EU의 Green Deal, Global Methane Pledge 등 세계 정책 및 이니셔티브는 기후변화 목표 달성을 위한 중요한 단계로서 농업 배출량 감축에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다. 특히 EU의 Green Deal은 EU가 2050년까지 기후중립을 달성하는 것을 목표로 하고 있으며, 2030년까지 화학농약 사용량 50% 감축, 비료 사용량 20% 감축 등의 중간 목표를 설정하고 있습니다. 이러한 규제는 유럽 시장에 영향을 미칠 뿐만 아니라 EU와 농산물 교역이 활발한 국가들에게도 영향을 미치며, 보조금, 탄소배출권, 기술 투자 등을 통해 지속가능한 관행을 장려합니다.
쌀 생산은 세계 식량 안보에 필수적이지만, 온실 가스(GHG) 배출량이 많기 때문에 지속가능한 관행에 적응해야 할 필요성이 점점 더 커지고 있습니다. 논에서 발생하는 메탄 배출량만 해도 전 세계 농업용 메탄 배출량의 약 10-12%를 차지합니다. 환경 규제가 강화되고 지속가능성에 대한 시장의 요구가 증가함에 따라 미국 산업은 생산성과 환경적 책임감을 동시에 충족시킬 수 있는 혁신이 필요한 중대한 기로에 서 있습니다.
상기 목표를 달성하기 위해 쌀 산업은 AWD(Alternate Wetting and Drying), SRI(System of Rice Intensification), 정밀 농업 도구, 바이오 숯과 같은 토양 개량과 같은 다양한 배출 감소 기술을 도입하고 있습니다. 이러한 방법들은 배출량을 줄일 뿐만 아니라 자원 효율성과 작물 수확량을 향상시킵니다. 예를 들어, AWD는 메탄 배출량을 최대 48%까지 줄일 수 있으며, SRI는 물 사용량을 줄이고 생산성을 향상시키기 때문에 물이 부족한 지역에서는 매력적인 방법입니다.
이 보고서는 쌀 생산의 배출 감축 방법과 혁신 동향을 조사하고, 배출 감축을 위한 다양한 정책 및 이니셔티브, 배출 감축 기술의 종류와 개요, 주요 국가의 배출 감축 기술 도입률과 성공 지표, 배출 감축 기술의 경제적 평가 등을 정리했습니다.
Market Introduction
Rice production is a cornerstone of food security and economic livelihood for millions worldwide, particularly in Asia, where rice serves as a staple food. However, traditional rice cultivation practices contribute significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially methane (CH2) and nitrous oxide (N2O), primarily due to flooded field conditions and fertilizer usage. As global populations grow, with an anticipated 34% increase by 2050, the pressure on rice production to meet demand while minimizing environmental impact is intensifying.
In recent years, global policies and initiatives, including the EU Green Deal and the Global Methane Pledge, have emphasized reducing agricultural emissions as a critical step toward achieving climate targets. The EU Green Deal, in particular, aims for the EU to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, with interim targets such as a 50% reduction in chemical pesticide use and a 20% reduction in fertilizer application by 2030. Such regulations not only influence European markets but also affect countries heavily engaged in agricultural trade with the EU, incentivizing sustainable practices through subsidies, carbon credits, and technological investments.
Industrial Impact
The rice production industry, while essential to global food security, faces increasing pressure to adapt to sustainable practices due to its significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Methane emissions from flooded rice paddies alone contribute approximately 10-12% of total global agricultural methane emissions. With heightened environmental regulations and market demands for sustainability, the rice industry is at a critical juncture, requiring innovations that balance productivity with environmental stewardship.
Key policies such as the EU Green Deal, Global Methane Pledge, and national climate commitments are pushing countries to implement emission reduction strategies in agriculture, including rice farming. For instance, under the EU Green Deal, the European Commission (EC) has set ambitious goals for the agricultural sector: reducing pesticide use by 50%, fertilizer use by 20%, and shifting 25% of farmland to organic practices by 2030. These regulations influence not only EU rice markets but also impact major rice-exporting countries that trade with the EU, spurring them to align with sustainable practices.
To meet these targets, the rice industry is embracing various emission reduction technologies such as Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD), System of Rice Intensification (SRI), precision agriculture tools, and soil amendments like biochar. These methods not only decrease emissions but also enhance resource efficiency and crop yields. For instance, AWD can reduce methane emissions by up to 48%, while SRI reduces water use and improves productivity, making it an attractive method in water-scarce regions.
Several industrial players, including agricultural technology firms and seed producers, are developing new tools to support emission reduction in rice farming. Companies like Deere & Company and Syngenta have invested in precision agriculture equipment, while BASF SE and Yara International are working on low-emission fertilizers. Additionally, collaborations between governments and private enterprises are on the rise. Through programs like the EU's Horizon 2020, funding and incentives are directed towards sustainable rice production initiatives, including water-saving technologies, controlled-release fertilizers, and smart agriculture practices.
Despite these advancements, the industry faces significant challenges. The high initial cost of technology, limited access to funding for smallholder farmers, and inadequate technical support hinder the large-scale adoption of emission reduction methods. Moreover, successful adoption of data-driven systems like Variable Rate Technology (VRT) or Data Management Supporting Systems (DMSS) requires robust infrastructure and digital literacy, both of which are often lacking in rural rice-growing regions.
Nonetheless, the industry impact of emission reduction in rice farming is promising. By implementing sustainable practices, rice producers can improve their resilience to climate impacts, gain access to carbon credit markets, and meet rising consumer demand for sustainable products. If adopted widely, these practices could contribute significantly to reducing global agricultural emissions and advancing climate goals, while also opening new economic opportunities within the rice production sector.
Adoption of Water Management Practices-particularly Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD)
A crucial factor in reducing emissions in rice production is the adoption of Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD), a water management practice that lowers methane emissions by up to 48%. Unlike traditional continuous flooding, AWD involves intermittently drying fields, which interrupts methane-producing bacteria. This method not only reduces emissions but also cuts water use by about 30%, benefiting areas with water scarcity and lowering irrigation costs. AWD is cost-effective and accessible for smallholders, yet challenges remain, including the need for farmer training and technical support. With proper incentives and support, AWD has the potential to be a cornerstone in sustainable, low-emission rice farming.
Recent Developments
How Can This Report Add Value to an Organization?
Product/Innovation Strategy: The report provides insights into various emission reduction methods in rice production, such as Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD), System of Rice Intensification (SRI), and precision irrigation. These sustainable practices enable rice producers to align with global climate goals and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, primarily methane and nitrous oxide. By detailing each method's efficiency, cost-benefit analysis, and adoption challenges, the report equips stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of how these technologies can be implemented across key rice-producing regions. The report highlights opportunities to capitalize on carbon credit schemes and government subsidies that incentivize the adoption of emission reduction technologies, offering a practical guide for organizations aiming to invest in low-emission rice production.
Growth/Marketing Strategy: The report analyzes significant developments in sustainable rice farming, including technological advancements, partnerships, and policy-driven incentives that promote emission reduction. Key players in the rice sector, such as technology providers and agricultural equipment manufacturers, are launching products and expanding operations to support sustainable practices. The report also outlines strategic partnerships, such as collaborations between government agencies and agricultural technology companies to facilitate training and equipment access for smallholders. For example, in 2024, several rice-producing countries in Asia and the U.S. rolled out AWD and crop residue management programs, supported by subsidies and financial incentives. These developments create an avenue for companies to broaden their customer base while meeting rising demand for sustainable, low-emission rice production solutions.
Competitive Strategy: The report profiles key rice-producing countries, comparing their progress in adopting emission reduction methods and sustainable farming practices. It analyzes the regulatory frameworks, infrastructure availability, and financial support that influence adoption rates in countries like China, India, Vietnam, and the United States. This competitive analysis helps stakeholders understand how countries stack against each other in emission reduction efforts and market maturity for sustainable rice farming. The report further explores regional incentives and barriers, providing a clear landscape of opportunities for companies to tailor their strategies according to each country's sustainability goals and regulatory requirements. This analysis helps organizations identify competitive advantages and potential areas for strategic expansion within the global low-emission rice production market.
Methodology
Primary Research
The primary sources involve the emission reduction from rice production industry experts and stakeholders such as platform developers and service providers. Respondents such as vice presidents, CEOs, marketing directors, and technology and innovation directors have been interviewed to verify this research study's qualitative and quantitative aspects.
The key data points taken from primary sources include:
Secondary Research
This research study involves the usage of extensive secondary research, directories, company websites, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as Hoovers, Bloomberg, Businessweek, and Factiva, to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the global market. In addition to the aforementioned data sources, the study has been undertaken with the help of other data sources and websites, such as www.fao.org and www.worldbank.org.
Secondary research was done to obtain crucial information about the industry's value chain, revenue models, the market's monetary chain, the total pool of key players, and the current and potential use cases and applications.
The key data points taken from secondary research include:
Key Countries
The countries that are analysed have been selected based on inputs gathered from analysing the country's imports, export, and agricultural trade agreements.
Some major countries analysed in this report are: