Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market: Analysis and Forecast, 2023-2028
상품코드:1411750
리서치사:BIS Research
발행일:2024년 01월
페이지 정보:영문
라이선스 & 가격 (부가세 별도)
ㅁ Add-on 가능: 고객의 요청에 따라 일정한 범위 내에서 Customization이 가능합니다. 자세한 사항은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
ㅁ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송기일은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
한글목차
영국을 제외한 유럽의 농업용 위성 영상 시장 규모는 2023년 6,550만 달러에서 예측 기간 중 7.51%의 CAGR로 추이하며, 2028년에는 9,412만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.
이 시장은 개선된 농업 및 지속가능 농업에 대한 수요의 증가에 의해 성장할 준비가 되어 있습니다.
주요 시장 통계
예측 기간
2023-2028년
2023년 평가
6,550만 달러
2028년 예측
9,412만 달러
CAGR
7.51%
유럽의 농업용 위성 영상 시장은 유럽 각국의 농업 부문에서 첨단 기술의 채택이 가속하고 있는 것을 배경으로 현재 대폭적인 성장을 달성하고 있습니다. 유럽 국가는 농업의 생산성 및 지속가능성의 중시가 특히 현저하고, 작물의 정확한 모니터링, 토양 건강 상태 평가, 관개와 시비의 최적화를 위한 귀중한 툴로서 위성 영상의 도입이 진행되고 있습니다. 이 기술은 병충해의 조기 발견, 자원 배분의 최적화, 정확한 작물 수확량 예측을 용이하게 합니다. 이 시장에는 수많은 위성 영상 서비스 프로바이더가 존재하며, 원격탐사 및 AI 등 최첨단 기술의 통합에 의한 혜택을 받고 있습니다. 유럽이 지속가능 농업과 정밀농업의 실천을 계속 우선시하는 가운데 농업용 위성 영상 시장은 큰 성장을 달성하며, 지역 전체의 농업 생산성 향상과 환경보전에 기여할 것입니다.
유럽의 농업용 위성 영상 시장을 조사했으며, 시장 개요, 시장 성장에 대한 각종 영향요인의 분석, 에코시스템, 진행중인 프로그램, 시장 규모의 추이·예측, 각종 구분·주요 국가별 상세 분석, 경쟁 구도, 주요 기업의 분석 등을 정리하여 전해드립니다.
시장의 분류
세분화 1 : 용도별
작물 헬스 모니터링
토양 매핑
임업
기타
세분화 2 : 최종사용자별
농업 관련 기업
정부·비정부기관
연구기관
기타
세분화 3 : 제품별
데이터 수집
처리
애널리틱스
통합 딜리버리 플랫폼
세분화 4 : 국가별
독일
프랑스
이탈리아
네덜란드
스위스
벨기에
스페인
기타
목차
주요 요약
조사 범위
제1장 시장
업계의 전망
시장의 정의
현재의 동향
에코시스템/진행중인 프로그램
사업 역학
사업 촉진요인
사업상 과제
시장 전략과 개발
사업 기회
스타트업 상황
에코시스템에서의 주요 스타트업 기업
자금조달 분석
디지털 농업 용도 액티브 위성과 기술
러시아·우크라이나 위기가 시장에 미치는 영향
제2장 지역
농업용 위성 영상 : 지역별
유럽
시장
용도
제품
유럽(국가별)
제3장 시장 : 경쟁 벤치마킹·기업 개요
경쟁 벤치마킹
시장 점유율 분석
기업 개요
Airbus
European Space Imaging
Gamaya
ICEYE
Open Cosmos Ltd
Syngenta
농업용 위성 영상 시장의 주요 신규 기업
SpaceSense
제4장 조사 방법
KSA
영문 목차
영문목차
“The Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (excluding U.K.) Expected to Reach $94.12 Million by 2028.”
Introduction to Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
The Europe satellite imaging for agriculture market (excluding U.K.) was valued at $65.5 million in 2023, and it is expected to grow with a CAGR of 7.51% during the forecast period 2023-2028 to reach $94.12 million by 2028. The satellite imaging for agriculture technology market is poised for growth due to the rising demand for improved and sustainable agricultural practices.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Forecast Period
2023 - 2028
2023 Evaluation
$65.5 Million
2028 Forecast
$94.12 Million
CAGR
7.51%
Market Introduction
The Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market is currently undergoing substantial growth, driven by the escalating adoption of advanced technologies within the agricultural sector across European nations. Renowned for their emphasis on agricultural productivity and sustainability, European countries are increasingly embracing satellite imaging as a valuable tool for precise crop monitoring, soil health assessment, and the optimization of irrigation and fertilization practices. This technology facilitates early detection of pests and diseases, resource allocation optimization, and accurate crop yield predictions. The market enjoys the presence of numerous satellite imaging service providers and benefits from the integration of cutting-edge technologies like remote sensing and artificial intelligence, streamlining data analysis and generating actionable insights. As Europe continues to prioritize sustainable agriculture and precision farming practices, the satellite imaging for agriculture market is poised for significant growth, contributing to enhanced agricultural productivity and environmental preservation throughout the region.
Market Segmentation:
Segmentation 1: by Application
Crop Health Monitoring
Soil Mapping
Forestry
Others
Segmentation 2: by End User
Agribusinesses
Government and Non-Government Agencies
Research Institutes
Others
Segmentation 3: by Product
Data Acquisition
Processing
Analytics
Integrated Delivery Platform
Segmentation 4: by Country
Germany
France
Italy
Netherlands
Switzerland
Belgium
Spain
Rest-of-Europe
How Can This Report Add Value to an Organization?
Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader understand the different technologies used for satellite imaging for agriculture and their potential. Moreover, the study gives the reader a detailed understanding of the different solutions provided by the satellite imaging technology providers, such as imaging, processing, and analyzing. Compared to conventional agricultural methods, satellite imaging technology enables more exact targeting of planting, soil mapping, and forestry, allowing farmers to save money by maximizing the use of their inputs.
Growth/Marketing Strategy: The Europe satellite imaging for agriculture market has seen major development by key players operating in the market, such as business expansion, partnership, collaboration, and joint venture. The favored strategy for the companies has been partnerships, collaborations, and joint ventures to strengthen their position in the Europe satellite imaging for agriculture market.
Competitive Strategy: Key players in the Europe satellite imaging for agriculture market analyzed and profiled in the study involve satellite imaging technology-based product manufacturers, including market segments covered by distinct product kinds, applications served, and regional presence, as well as the influence of important market tactics employed. Moreover, a detailed competitive benchmarking of the players operating in the Europe satellite imaging for agriculture market has been done to help the reader understand how players stack against each other, presenting a clear market landscape. Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.
Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis
The companies that are profiled have been selected based on inputs gathered from primary experts and analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, and market penetration.
Key Companies Profiled:
Airbus
European Space Imaging
Gamaya
ICEYE
Open Cosmos Ltd.
Syngenta
SpaceSense
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Scope of the Study
1. Markets
1.1. Industry Outlook
1.1.1. Market Definition
1.1.2. Ongoing Trends
1.1.2.1. Development of Small Satellite Constellations
1.1.2.2. Integration with other technologies
1.1.3. Ecosystem/Ongoing Programs
1.1.3.1. Consortiums, Associations, and Regulatory Bodies
1.1.3.2. Government Initiatives and Impacts
1.2. Business Dynamics
1.2.1. Business Drivers
1.2.1.1. Increasing Requirements from Insurance Sector
1.2.1.2. Increasing Farm Consolidation
1.2.1.3. High Benefits over Other Remote Sensing Technology and Infield Monitoring Technology
1.2.1.4. Need for Sustainable Agriculture Practices
1.2.2. Business Challenges
1.2.2.1. Technical Challenges in Obtaining and Analyzing Satellite Imagery
1.2.2.1.1. Hindrance Due to Cloud Cover
1.2.2.1.2. Hindrance due to Spatial and Temporal Resolution
1.2.2.2. Limited Awareness and Understanding across Developing Countries
1.2.2.3. Geopolitical Issues
1.2.3. Market Strategies and Developments
1.2.3.1. Business Strategies
1.2.3.1.1. Product Developments
1.2.3.1.2. Market Developments
1.2.3.2. Corporate Strategies
1.2.3.2.1. Mergers and Acquisitions
1.2.3.2.2. Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
1.2.3.2.3. Snapshot of Corporate Strategies Adopted by the Key Players in the Market
1.2.3.3. Case Study
1.2.3.3.1. Airbus in Yield Optimization
1.2.3.3.2. Planet Labs PBC in Irrigation Intelligence
1.2.3.3.3. EOS Data Analytics,Inc in Precision Agriculture
1.2.4. Business Opportunities
1.2.4.1. Rising Threat of Climate Risk
1.2.4.2. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in Action
1.2.4.3. Tapping Small Holding Farmer with Affordable Solutions
1.3. Start-Up Landscape
1.3.1. Key Start-Ups in the Ecosystem
1.3.2. Funding Analysis
1.3.2.1. Total Investment and Number of Funding Deals
1.3.2.2. Top Funding Deals by the Start-ups
1.3.2.3. Funding Analysis (by Country)
1.3.2.4. Top Investors
1.4. Active Satellites for Digital Agriculture Application and their Technicalities
1.5. Impact of Russia-Ukraine Crisis on the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
2. Region
2.1. Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market - by Region
2.2. Europe
2.2.1. Markets
2.2.1.1. Key Providers in Europe
2.2.1.2. Buyer Attributes
2.2.1.2.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.1.2.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.1.3. Business Challenges
2.2.1.4. Business Drivers
2.2.2. Applications
2.2.2.1. Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.2.2. Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.3. Products
2.2.3.1. Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4. Europe (by Country)
2.2.4.1. Italy
2.2.4.1.1. Markets
2.2.4.1.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.1.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.1.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.1.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.1.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.1.2. Application
2.2.4.1.2.1. Italy Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.1.2.2. Italy Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.1.3. Product
2.2.4.1.3.1. Italy Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.2. France
2.2.4.2.1. Markets
2.2.4.2.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.2.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.2.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.2.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.2.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.2.2. Application
2.2.4.2.2.1. France Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.2.2.2. France Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.2.3. Product
2.2.4.2.3.1. France Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.3. Netherlands
2.2.4.3.1. Markets
2.2.4.3.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.3.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.3.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.3.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.3.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.3.2. Application
2.2.4.3.2.1. Netherlands Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.3.2.2. Netherlands Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.3.3. Product
2.2.4.3.3.1. Netherlands Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.4. Germany
2.2.4.4.1. Markets
2.2.4.4.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.4.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.4.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.4.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.4.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.4.2. Application
2.2.4.4.2.1. Germany Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.4.2.2. Germany Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.4.3. Product
2.2.4.4.3.1. Germany Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.5. Switzerland
2.2.4.5.1. Markets
2.2.4.5.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.5.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.5.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.5.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.5.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.5.2. Application
2.2.4.5.2.1. Switzerland Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.5.2.2. Switzerland Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.5.3. Product
2.2.4.5.3.1. Switzerland Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.6. Belgium
2.2.4.6.1. Markets
2.2.4.6.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.6.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.6.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.6.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.6.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.6.2. Application
2.2.4.6.2.1. Belgium Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.6.2.2. Belgium Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.6.3. Product
2.2.4.6.3.1. Belgium Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.7. Spain
2.2.4.7.1. Markets
2.2.4.7.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.7.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.7.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.7.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.7.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.7.2. Application
2.2.4.7.2.1. Spain Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.7.2.2. Spain Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.7.3. Product
2.2.4.7.3.1. Spain Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
2.2.4.8. Rest-of-Europe
2.2.4.8.1. Markets
2.2.4.8.1.1. Buyer Attributes
2.2.4.8.1.1.1. Farm Size, Number of Farms, and State of Digitalization
2.2.4.8.1.1.2. Crop Pattern, Biotic, and Abiotic Stress Factors
2.2.4.8.1.2. Business Challenges
2.2.4.8.1.3. Business Drivers
2.2.4.8.2. Application
2.2.4.8.2.1. Rest-of-Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Application)
2.2.4.8.2.2. Rest-of-Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by End User)
2.2.4.8.3. Product
2.2.4.8.3.1. Rest-of-Europe Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market (by Product)
3. Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles
3.1. Competitive Benchmarking
3.2. Market Share Analysis
3.3. Company Profiles
3.3.1. Airbus
3.3.1.1. Company Overview
3.3.1.1.1. Role of Airbus in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.3.1.1.2. Product Portfolio
3.3.1.2. Business Strategies
3.3.1.2.1. Product Development
3.3.1.3. Corporate Strategies
3.3.1.3.1. Partnership, Joint Venture, Collaboration and Alliance
3.3.1.4. Customer Profile
3.3.1.4.1. Target Customer Segment
3.3.1.4.2. Key Clients
3.3.1.5. Analyst View
3.3.1.5.1. Regional Growth
3.3.2. European Space Imaging
3.3.2.1. Company Overview
3.3.2.1.1. Role of European Space Imaging in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.3.2.1.2. Product Portfolio
3.3.2.2. Corporate Strategies
3.3.2.2.1. Partnership, Joint Venture, Collaboration and Alliance
3.3.2.3. Customer Profile
3.3.2.3.1. Target Customer Segment
3.3.2.4. Analyst View
3.3.2.4.1. Regional Growth
3.3.3. Gamaya
3.3.3.1. Company Overview
3.3.3.1.1. Role of Gamaya in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.3.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
3.3.3.2. Business Strategies
3.3.3.2.1. Product Development
3.3.3.3. Customer Profile
3.3.3.3.1. Target Customer Segment
3.3.3.4. Analyst View
3.3.3.4.1. Regional Growth
3.3.4. ICEYE
3.3.4.1. Company Overview
3.3.4.1.1. Role of ICEYE in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.3.4.1.2. Product Portfolio
3.3.4.2. Business Strategies
3.3.4.2.1. Market Development
3.3.4.3. Customer Profile
3.3.4.3.1. Target Customer Segment
3.3.4.3.2. Key Clients
3.3.4.4. Analyst View
3.3.4.4.1. Regional Growth
3.3.5. Open Cosmos Ltd
3.3.5.1. Company Overview
3.3.5.1.1. Role of Open Cosmos Ltd in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.3.5.1.2. Product Portfolio
3.3.5.2. Business Strategies
3.3.5.2.1. Product Development
3.3.5.3. Corporate Strategies
3.3.5.3.1. Partnership, Joint Venture, Collaboration and Alliance
3.3.5.4. Customer Profile
3.3.5.4.1. Target Customer Segment
3.3.5.5. Analyst View
3.3.5.5.1. Regional Growth
3.3.6. Syngenta
3.3.6.1. Company Overview
3.3.6.2. Role of Syngenta in Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.3.6.3. Product Portfolio
3.3.6.4. Business Strategies
3.3.6.4.1. Market Developments
3.3.6.4.2. Product Developments
3.3.6.5. Customer Profile
3.3.6.5.1. Target Customers
3.3.6.6. Analyst View
3.4. Key Start-Ups in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.4.1. SpaceSense
3.4.1.1. Company Overview
3.4.1.1.1. Role of SpaceSense in the Satellite Imaging for Agriculture Market
3.4.1.1.2. Product Portfolio
3.4.1.2. Corporate Strategies
3.4.1.2.1. Partnership, Joint Venture, Collaboration and Alliance