한글목차

유럽의 최소침습 척추 기술 시장 규모는 2022년 6억 9,110만 달러에서 예측 기간 동안 11.84%의 CAGR을 기록하며 2032년 21억 1,650만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예상됩니다.

척추 침습을 최소화하는 수술에 대한 선호도가 높아짐에 따라 이 시장은 성장할 것으로 예상됩니다. 또한, 시뮬레이션, 교육 및 지속적인 의학 교육의 중요성에 대한 개업의들의 인식이 높아짐에 따라 성장세에 기여할 것으로 예상됩니다.

유럽의 최소침습 척추 기술 시장은 최소침습 척추 시술에 대한 선호도와 시뮬레이션, 교육 및 지속적인 의학 교육에 대한 의사의 인식이 높아짐에 따라 크게 성장하고 있습니다. 의료 기술의 발전으로 침습성을 줄인 척추 치료에 대한 새로운 접근 방식이 가능해지면서 환자들에게 회복 시간 단축, 수술 후 통증 감소, 조직 손상 최소화 등의 이점을 제공하고 있습니다. 시장은 척추 관련 질환의 증가와 고령화 사회의 확대에 대응하고 있습니다. 환자 예후 개선과 의료비 절감에 중점을 두고 있는 유럽에서는 최소침습적 척추 기술 채택이 지속적으로 확대되고 있습니다. 이러한 추세는 척추 치료의 전망을 재구성하고 이 지역 의료 서비스의 전반적인 개선에 기여하고 있습니다.

유럽의 최소침습 척추 기술 시장을 조사했으며, 시장 개요, 시장 성장에 영향을 미치는 각종 요인 분석, 기술·특허 동향, 제품 벤치마킹, 임상시험 동향, 규제 환경, 시장 규모 추이 및 예측, 각종 부문별·주요 국가별 상세 분석, 경쟁 상황, 주요 기업 분석 등의 정보를 정리하여 전해드립니다.

시장 분류

세분화 1: 국가별

• 독일
• 프랑스
• 영국
• 이탈리아
• 스페인
• 기타

목차

주요 요약

조사 범위

조사 방법

제1장 시장

• 세계 시장 전망
  • 시장 개요
  • 제품의 정의
  • 포함 기준과 제외 기준
  • 주요 조사 결과
  • 가정과 제한사항
  • 시장 성장 시나리오
• 업계 전망
  • 주요 동향
  • 기회 평가
  • 특허 분석
  • 제품 벤치마킹
  • 임상시험
• 최소침습 척추 기술에 대한 COVID-19의 영향
• 사업 역학
  • 영향 분석
  • 사업 촉진요인
  • 사업상 제약
  • 사업 기회

제2장 유럽

• 유럽의 최소침습 척추 기술 시장
  • 규제 체계
  • 주요 조사 결과와 기회 평가
  • 시장 역학
  • 시장 규모와 예측

제3장 경쟁 벤치마킹과 기업 개요

• 경쟁 상황
  • 주요 전략과 전개
• 기업 개요
  • AMS Group
  • B. Braun SE
  • Medtronic plc
  • Richard Wolf GmbH
  • Spineart

영문목차

“The Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market Expected to Reach $2,116.5 Million by 2032.”

Introduction to Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market

The Europe minimally invasive spine technologies market was valued at $691.1 million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach $2,116.5 million by 2032, witnessing a CAGR of 11.84% during the forecast period 2022-2032. The market for minimally invasive spine technologies is anticipated to experience growth due to the increasing preference for surgical procedures that involve minimal invasion in the spine. Additionally, practitioners' growing awareness regarding the importance of simulation, training, and ongoing medical education is expected to contribute to this upward trend.

Market Introduction

The Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market is experiencing significant growth, propelled by the increasing favoritism toward less invasive spinal procedures and heightened awareness among practitioners regarding simulation, training, and continuous medical education. Advancements in medical technologies are enabling novel approaches to spinal interventions that involve reduced invasiveness, providing patients with benefits such as shorter recovery times, diminished postoperative pain, and minimized tissue damage. The market is responding to a growing incidence of spine-related disorders and an expanding aging population. With a focus on enhancing patient outcomes and curbing healthcare costs, the adoption of minimally invasive spine technologies in Europe is poised for ongoing expansion. This trend is reshaping the landscape of spinal interventions and contributing to the overall improvement of healthcare delivery in the region.

Market Segmentation:

Segmentation 1: by Country

• Germany
• France
• U.K.
• Italy
• Spain
• Rest-of-Europe

How can this report add value to an organization?

Growth/Marketing Strategy: The Europe minimally invasive spine technologies market has seen major developments by key players operating in the market, such as partnerships, collaborations and business expansions, mergers and acquisitions, product launches, and funding activities. The favored strategy for the companies has been new offerings in the minimally invasive spine technologies market.

Competitive Strategy: Key players in the Europe minimally invasive spine technologies market analyzed and profiled in the study involve players that offer surgical systems, instruments, and systems. Moreover, a detailed market share analysis of the players operating in the Europe minimally invasive spine technologies market has been done to help the reader understand how players stack against each other, presenting a clear market landscape. Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The featured companies have been meticulously chosen, drawing insights from primary experts and thorough evaluations of company coverage, product offerings, and market presence.

Some prominent names established in this market are:

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Scope of the Study

Research Methodology

1. Markets

• 1.1. Global Market Outlook
  • 1.1.1. Market Overview
  • 1.1.2. Product Definition
  • 1.1.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
  • 1.1.4. Key Findings
  • 1.1.5. Assumptions and Limitations
  • 1.1.6. Market Growth Scenario
    • 1.1.6.1. Realistic Growth Scenario
    • 1.1.6.2. Optimistic Growth Scenario
    • 1.1.6.3. Pessimistic Growth Scenario
• 1.2. Industry Outlook
  • 1.2.1. Key Trends
  • 1.2.2. Opportunity Assessment
  • 1.2.3. Patent Analysis
    • 1.2.3.1. Awaited Technological Developments
    • 1.2.3.2. Patent Filing Trend (by Country)
    • 1.2.3.3. Patent Filing Trend (by Year)
  • 1.2.4. Product Benchmarking
  • 1.2.5. Clinical Trials
• 1.3. Impact of COVID-19 on the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies
  • 1.3.1. Pre-COVID-19 Phase
  • 1.3.2. During COVID-19
  • 1.3.3. Post-COVID-19 Phase
    • 1.3.3.1. Impact on Demand and Supply
    • 1.3.3.2. Impact on Competitive Landscape
    • 1.3.3.3. Impact on Company Revenue
• 1.4. Business Dynamics
  • 1.4.1. Impact Analysis
  • 1.4.2. Business Drivers
    • 1.4.2.1. Increasing Incidences and Prevalence of Spinal Disorders
    • 1.4.2.2. Increasing Preference for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeries
    • 1.4.2.3. Technological Advancement in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgical Procedures
  • 1.4.3. Business Restraints
    • 1.4.3.1. Lack of Well-Established Landscape for Reimbursement for Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
    • 1.4.3.2. Factors Hindering the Implementation of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
      • 1.4.3.2.1. High Cost of Capital Equipment Purchases and Disposables
      • 1.4.3.2.2. Lack of Training Leading to Shortage of Skilled Professionals
  • 1.4.4. Business Opportunities
    • 1.4.4.1. Augmentation of Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    • 1.4.4.2. Leveraging Synergies to Diversify Business Portfolio

2. Europe

• 2.1. Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
  • 2.1.1. Regulatory Framework
    • 2.1.1.1. Spinal Classification EU MDR Model Proposed by Team NB
  • 2.1.2. Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
  • 2.1.3. Market Dynamics
    • 2.1.3.1. Impact Analysis
  • 2.1.4. Market Sizing and Forecast
    • 2.1.4.1. Europe Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market (by Country)
      • 2.1.4.1.1. Germany
        • 2.1.4.1.1.1. Market Dynamics
        • 2.1.4.1.1.2. Market Size and Forecast
      • 2.1.4.1.2. U.K.
        • 2.1.4.1.2.1. Market Dynamics
        • 2.1.4.1.2.2. Market Size and Forecast
      • 2.1.4.1.3. France
        • 2.1.4.1.3.1. Market Dynamics
        • 2.1.4.1.3.2. Market Size and Forecast
      • 2.1.4.1.4. Italy
        • 2.1.4.1.4.1. Market Dynamics
        • 2.1.4.1.4.2. Market Size and Forecast
      • 2.1.4.1.5. Spain
        • 2.1.4.1.5.1. Market Dynamics
        • 2.1.4.1.5.2. Market Size and Forecast
      • 2.1.4.1.6. Rest-of-Europe
        • 2.1.4.1.6.1. Market Dynamics
        • 2.1.4.1.6.2. Market Size and Forecast

3. Competitive Benchmarking and Company Profiles

• 3.1. Competitive Landscape
  • 3.1.1. Key Strategies and Developments
    • 3.1.1.1. Regulatory and Legal Activities
    • 3.1.1.2. New Offerings
    • 3.1.1.3. Mergers and Acquisitions
    • 3.1.1.4. Partnerships, Collaborations, and Business Expansions
• 3.2. Company Profiles
  • 3.2.1. AMS Group
    • 3.2.1.1. Company Overview
    • 3.2.1.2. Role of AMS Group in the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 3.2.1.3. Analyst Perspective
  • 3.2.2. B. Braun SE
    • 3.2.2.1. Company Overview
    • 3.2.2.2. Role of B. Braun SE in the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 3.2.2.3. Product Portfolio
    • 3.2.2.4. Financials
    • 3.2.2.5. Analyst Perception
  • 3.2.3. Medtronic plc
    • 3.2.3.1. Company Overview
    • 3.2.3.2. Role of Medtronic plc in the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 3.2.3.3. Product Portfolio
    • 3.2.3.4. Financials
    • 3.2.3.5. Recent Developments
    • 3.2.3.6. Analyst Perception
  • 3.2.4. Richard Wolf GmbH
    • 3.2.4.1. Company Overview
    • 3.2.4.2. Role of Richard Wolf GmbH in the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 3.2.4.3. Analyst Perspective
  • 3.2.5. Spineart
    • 3.2.5.1. Company Overview
    • 3.2.5.2. Role of Spineart in the Minimally Invasive Spine Technologies Market
    • 3.2.5.3. Recent Developments
    • 3.2.5.4. Analyst Perspective